FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-29-2005, 03:09 AM   #151
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenn6162
The book of Isaiah was written before the Babylonian dispertion, but speaks of the Lord regathering Israel for a second time, which would be after the 70 AD dispertion.

Isa 11:11 And it shall come to pass in that day, [that] the Lord shall set his hand again the second time to recover the remnant of his people, which shall be left, from Assyria, and from Egypt, and from Pathros, and from Cush, and from Elam, and from Shinar, and from Hamath, and from the islands of the sea.

Isa 11:12 And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth.

I have more, but only posting this one for now. Is this one clear and unambiguous?
1. The Exodus.

2. The return from Babylon.
Quote:
Also how do you explain the land's change from the days when the arabs were in the land and it was a desert and when they came back in basically turned green?
Massive irrigation projects, tree-planting etc.
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 05:23 AM   #152
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Essex, England
Posts: 608
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenn6162
Hi Paradox,
I have read much of your testimony, and your eschatology pages. They are very interesting, and I really appreciate you sharing that with me. I have many thoughts on your experience with your former faith, and how you approached God's will in your life and others close to you. I would like to speak frankly with you about them, but I have decided not to for fear that I would offend you. I do not know you, and cannot possibly know your whole experience and circumstances surrounding your deconversion from a few pages from your website. So thanks for sharing that with me.
Please don't worry about offending me. If I come to this forum criticisizing Christians that come here then I ought to be able to take it when it's dished back.
You might find that I'd be quite aggressive in my defence, but don't take that as an indicator that I'm offended - it would simply be that I'm passionate about my position. Somewhere in my testimony you'll see that I was quite open to the suggestion that my approach to my faith was incorrect and was very willing to be corrected - that, for 12 years was usually my approach anway - that I somehow "missed it" when things didn't go right. However, nothing came up to convince me that I was wrong in the way I viewed my faith, therefore I reached the conclusion that Christianity itself was flawed. But fire away - I'm all ears, but it would have to be spectacular evidence indeed to convince me out of my current convictions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenn6162
Yes I know who was behind giving Israel back their land, but how did Isaiah know it was possible that it would happen in a day. If you tell me it was altered, then as I said before we need to find a Bible that was printed before 1940.
You missed the point. Those in power had the opportunity to make the prophecy happen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenn6162
"Who has ever heard of such a thing? Who has even seen such things? Can a country be born in a day or a nation be brought forth in a moment? Yet no sooner is Zion in labor, than she gives birth to her children... Rejoice with Jerusalem and be glad for her, all you who love her; rejoice greatly with her, all you who mourn over her" (Isa. 66:8,10).
What? This is so vague it could be attributed to almost anything - the same with the other references you provided.
Paradox is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 06:57 AM   #153
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 517
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack the Bodiless
1. The Exodus.

2. The return from Babylon.

Massive irrigation projects, tree-planting etc.
The return from Babylon, doesn't qualify to me as the four corners of the earth. I know that your human wisdom, will argue with the four corners of the earth. So I will give that answer in advance, it was easy to understand for Isaiah. Those types of inaccuaracies aren't enough to cause me to question my faith.

The dispertion to the "four corners of the earth" happened after the holocaust.

As for your explanation for the desert bloom, still doesn't explain how Isaiah knew it would happen.
Jenn6162 is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 07:07 AM   #154
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 517
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paradox
Please don't worry about offending me. If I come to this forum criticisizing Christians that come here then I ought to be able to take it when it's dished back.
You might find that I'd be quite aggressive in my defence, but don't take that as an indicator that I'm offended - it would simply be that I'm passionate about my position. Somewhere in my testimony you'll see that I was quite open to the suggestion that my approach to my faith was incorrect and was very willing to be corrected - that, for 12 years was usually my approach anway - that I somehow "missed it" when things didn't go right. However, nothing came up to convince me that I was wrong in the way I viewed my faith, therefore I reached the conclusion that Christianity itself was flawed. But fire away - I'm all ears, but it would have to be spectacular evidence indeed to convince me out of my current convictions.
I just wanted to be sure I wouldn't offend you personally. I want to read more of your testimony and eschatology pages before I comment. I appreciate passion. I am not trying to bring you back to Christianity, you would have to have faith. I can't give that to you. There is no clear cut evidence that would convince anyone that the Bible is the word of God.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Paradox
You missed the point. Those in power had the opportunity to make the prophecy happen.
You missed my point, I was paying attention to your point. I said how did Isaiah know it could happen in a day? I think that is a relevant question.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Paradox
What? This is so vague it could be attributed to almost anything - the same with the other references you provided.
Well I tried. I could post more about Israel, but if you are all bored with the topic I will not.
Jenn6162 is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 07:28 AM   #155
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenn6162
The return from Babylon, doesn't qualify to me as the four corners of the earth. I know that your human wisdom, will argue with the four corners of the earth. So I will give that answer in advance, it was easy to understand for Isaiah. Those types of inaccuaracies aren't enough to cause me to question my faith.

The dispertion to the "four corners of the earth" happened after the holocaust.
It's reasonable to assume the Jews had been scattered all over the world known to Isaiah (the Middle-East). I doubt if the Babylonians were 100% effective at rounding up every one and keeping them in Babylon (and, IIRC, this only happened to one of the two Hebrew kingdoms anyhow).

I'm also fairly sure that scholars consider Isaiah to have been written over an extended period, by more than one author, and partly after the Babylonian exile.
Quote:
As for your explanation for the desert bloom, still doesn't explain how Isaiah knew it would happen.
Those who knew about the prophecy had the power to make it happen. However, there is still no good indication that 1948 was the return being referred to. The post-Babylonian exilic period was the second summons to Israel.
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 09:35 AM   #156
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenn6162
I said how did Isaiah know it could happen in a day? I think that is a relevant question.
What is it that you think happened in one day?

The process that resulted in the restoration of Israel certainly took longer than a day.
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 10:05 AM   #157
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13
The process that resulted in the restoration of Israel certainly took longer than a day.
"Took" is past tense. Israel is *still* not complete - in part because Jews have not been gathered home (twice as many Jews outside Israel as in) - and in part because there is a Mosque sitting on Temple Mount. There is no sense of "one day" which can logically be applied to the recreation of Israel.
Wallener is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 10:10 AM   #158
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenn6162
The dispertion to the "four corners of the earth" happened after the holocaust.
This is incorrect. The first dispersion happened roughly 700 years before the Second Temple was destroyed. A second dispersion, possibly even larger than the first, happened about 200 years later. By 150 BCE Jews were spread across most of the know/reachable world, as there are recorded settlements throughout the mediteranean basin, as far east as India, and as far north as (modern) Russia.
Wallener is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 10:23 AM   #159
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 517
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13
What is it that you think happened in one day?

The process that resulted in the restoration of Israel certainly took longer than a day.
THE DECLARATION OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE STATE OF ISRAEL
May 14, 1948
On May 14, 1948, on the day in which the British Mandate over a Palestine expired, the Jewish People's Council gathered at the Tel Aviv Museum, and approved the following proclamation, declaring the establishment of the State of Israel. The new state was recognized that night by the United States.


In one day the nation of Israel was recognized by the US. I understand the criticism that the US was trying to fulfill the prophecy, but it was still fulfilled.
Jenn6162 is offline  
Old 07-29-2005, 10:40 AM   #160
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Essex, England
Posts: 608
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenn6162
I just wanted to be sure I wouldn't offend you personally. I want to read more of your testimony and eschatology pages before I comment. I appreciate passion. I am not trying to bring you back to Christianity, you would have to have faith. I can't give that to you. There is no clear cut evidence that would convince anyone that the Bible is the word of God.
Wise words, and thank you. Too many Christians have waded in with comments concerning my decision without fully understanding where I'm coming from. They ask questions which they should know the answer to if they had actually read through it all. However, I don't blame them, it is rather long! So, I thank you in advance for taking the time to do that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenn6162
You missed my point, I was paying attention to your point. I said how did Isaiah know it could happen in a day? I think that is a relevant question.
You're right, I did miss your point. Apologies.
However, the fact that it happened in one day isn't remarkable. A day is a nice round figure that is often used in the Bible and it's no surprise that it took a day to actually make the decision really, is it?
Paradox is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:17 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.