Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
View Poll Results: What do you think the probability of a historical Jesus is? | |||
100% - I have complete faith that Jesus of Nazareth was a real person. | 8 | 6.15% | |
80-100% | 10 | 7.69% | |
60-80% | 15 | 11.54% | |
40-60% | 22 | 16.92% | |
20-40% | 17 | 13.08% | |
0-20% | 37 | 28.46% | |
o% - I have complete faith that Jesus of Nazareth was not a real person, | 21 | 16.15% | |
Voters: 130. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
12-04-2008, 05:05 AM | #211 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sweden, Europe
Posts: 12,091
|
The subjective probability of Jesus Christ is close to 99.9999... % cause he exists within every believers Heart that is a virtual Heart in their physical brain so Jesus is a wetware program that is named a Meme construct and is seen as a mental Virus that "possess" the believer and being dispersed in a parallel computer way in every Operating System of Christians he is almost eternal and non-destructable as a construct. Only by shutting down the OS for Millenia would put him on par with Zeus and Thor and the other dead gods.
|
12-04-2008, 06:48 AM | #212 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
|
Yes, it CAN. You fundamentally have no idea how probability works. That's fine, hardly anyone does, but quit acting like you know what you're talking about in that regard.
|
12-04-2008, 07:08 AM | #213 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
Answer the question if you know how probabilty works. If there are two persons living in Nazareth in the 1st century and one is called Jesus, what is the probablility that the person called Jesus was the Jesus of Nazareth of the NT? I say the probability cannot exceed 50%. Now, what do you say? You know how probability works? |
|
12-04-2008, 10:40 AM | #214 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
|
|
12-04-2008, 11:09 AM | #215 |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
|
12-04-2008, 11:12 AM | #216 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
|
Quote:
But let us pursue this a bit. Please reveal the formula you used to derive your maximum percentage. Ben. |
|
12-04-2008, 11:13 AM | #217 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dancing
Posts: 9,940
|
Quote:
|
||
12-04-2008, 11:20 AM | #218 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
You belief is irrelevant to the probability of the existence of Jesus of Nazareth as described in the NT. |
||
12-04-2008, 11:23 AM | #219 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,787
|
|
12-04-2008, 11:40 AM | #220 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
However, as the number of persons are increased to over a hundred with respect to the hypothetical scenario with respect to Jesus of Nazareth, the probabilities must decrease or cannot exceed 1%. Based on the information about Jesus of Nazareth, he did not always stay in Nazareth, so the probability that someone called Jesus was the Jesus of Nazareth as described is further reduced. And, if the choices approach 1000, 10,000, 100, 000 or 1,000,000 then the probabilities are reduced inversely proportional to the choices and approach 0% when it is factored in that Jesus of Nazareth is reported to have resurrected and ascended through the clouds. |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|