Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-31-2006, 07:11 AM | #61 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
|
Quote:
|
|
07-31-2006, 09:37 AM | #62 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA, Missouri
Posts: 3,070
|
Quote:
ted |
|
07-31-2006, 09:22 PM | #63 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 412
|
Quote:
Paul is settling a dispute between believers. Some were saying that there was no resurrection at all, yet they believed in Christ and the forgivness of sin, two ideas which are incompatable. He doesn't need to reflect on "records," that's what a non-believer would need to hear. Paul is simply putting emphasis on, and stoking, the conduit of their faith - proclamation of the gospel. There is no mysterious "silence" here except that inserted by Earl. The other 19 are equally non-persuasive. If this is an example of a "devastating" case against the resurrection of Christ then the resurrection of Christ is in good shape. |
|
08-02-2006, 07:14 AM | #64 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Nazareth
Posts: 2,357
|
Quote:
Quote:
when Paul says his knowledge of Jesus was based on Revelation and not from Man, is it means his fellow believers did not tell him of their Revelations, they told him of their Memories. Paul makes an important Point that his Knowledge of Jesus is from Jesus and not from Man. I agree that Paul never Explicitly identifies a man telling him something Historical about Jesus. But what is the better Implication? That Jesus believers before and after Paul's Conversion told him something about a supposed Historical Jesus or never told him anything about a supposed Historical Jesus? I prophesy that you will say the above Assumes Historical Jesus. I think it is in that direction but short of begging the question. Men could have told Paul of a supposed Historical Jesus even if there wasn't one. No question the Saved Paul CorpseUs never tells us the specifics of who and what Paul learned from Men which also has an Implication that Paul learned little or nothing about HJ from Men. Even though I Am HJ right now I'm still close to Undecided. One possible factor which has been mentioned here is in addition to Paul's emphasis of Impossible Jesus his Preserved Boysonbury Gems of Jesus were not just casual letters to a specific Church at a specific time and place but Church Policy letters trying to emphasize the Big picture (Impossible Jesus). Joseph |
||
08-02-2006, 11:59 PM | #65 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
|
Quote:
Given his silences, though, then we must ask about their most probable implication in the light of all other evidence relevant to Jesus' historicity. |
|
08-04-2006, 03:09 AM | #66 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
|
Quote:
|
|
08-04-2006, 03:46 AM | #67 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Quote:
1. Paul was too early for oral tradition to have been codified. 2. His epistles weren't concerned for what Jesus did while on earth, but what his sacrifice means to Christians. 3. He probably understood that he was the last person that people would trust on matters of what Jesus did, not actually knowing the man himself. |
|
08-04-2006, 11:46 PM | #68 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
|
Quote:
|
|
08-05-2006, 12:57 AM | #69 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Quote:
|
|
08-05-2006, 11:16 AM | #70 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 3,103
|
Quote:
1 Cor. 7:10-11 = Mt. 19:3-9; Mk. 10:6 -- Ruling on Divorce ("To the married I give charge, not I but the Lord") 1 Cor. 7:25 = Mt. 19:10-12 -- On Celebacy ("I have no directions from the Lord") 1 Cor. 9:14 = Lk. 10:7 -- Support for Apostles ("the Lord directed that those who preach...") 1 Cor. 11:23-26 = Lk. 22:14-20 -- Institution of the Lord's Supper ("the Lord Jesus ... said") Rom. 12:14 = Lk. 6:27 -- Blessing of the persecuted Rom. 12:17 = Lk. 6:29 -- Not repaying evil with evil Rom 12:18 = Mk. 9:50 -- Peace among yourselves Rom. 13:7 = Lk. 20:20-26 -- Paying taxes to authorities Rom. 13:8-10 = Mk. 12:28-31 -- Loving Your Neighbor Sums Up Law Rom. 14:10 = Lk. 6:37 -- Do not judge Rom 14:13 = Lk. 17:1-4 -- No stumbling block Rom. 14:14 = Mk. 7:15 -- Nothing is unclean 1 Thess 5:2 = Lk. 12:39 -- Thief in the night 1 Thess 5:13 = Mk. 9:50 -- Peace among yourselves 1 Thess 5:15 = Lk. 6:29 -- Not repaying evil with evil 1 Cor. 2:9: "What no eye has seen, nor ear heard, nor the heart of man conceived..." GThom 17: "I shall give you what no eye has seen and what no ear has heard and what no hand has touched and what has never occurred to the human mind." 1 Cor. 4:8: "Already you have become rich! Without us you have become kings!" GThom 81: "Let him who has grown rich be king." 1 Cor. 10:27: "If one of the unbelievers invites you to dinner and you are disposed to go, eat whatever is set before you." GThom 14:2: "When you go into any land and walk about in the districts, eat what they set before you." (cf. Lk. 10:1-12) 1 Cor. 13:2: "If I have all faith, so as to move mountains, but have not love, I am nothing." Mt. 17:20: "If you have faith as a grain of mustard seed, you will have to this mountain, 'Move from here to there,' and it will move." (cf. GThom 48) Gal 2:28: "There is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus." GThom 22:4: "When you make the male and the female one and the same, so that the male not be male nor the female female...then you will enter [the kingdom]." Phil. 3:3: "For we are the true circumcision, who worships God in spirit." (cf. Rom 2:25-29) GThom 54: "Rather, the true circumcision in spirit has become completely profitable." |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|