|  | Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
|  02-27-2012, 02:59 PM | #61 | |
| Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Florida 
					Posts: 19,796
				 |   Quote: 
 | |
|   | 
|  02-27-2012, 03:06 PM | #62 | ||
| Contributor Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Seattle 
					Posts: 27,602
				 |   Quote: 
 | ||
|   | 
|  02-27-2012, 04:06 PM | #63 | ||
| Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Auburn ca 
					Posts: 4,269
				 |   Quote: 
 My point is simply the historical core isnt even being argued here, its dismissed with prejudice.   | ||
|   | 
|  02-27-2012, 04:09 PM | #64 | ||
| Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Auburn ca 
					Posts: 4,269
				 |   Quote: 
 You know, there is some accuracy in what you say in relationship to noahs story. Started in Sumerian legend, retold 3 times before hebrews remade it into their own version. Noahs flood contains more mythical content then was ever added to HJ, its a night and day difference. Yet there was a attested flood in 2900 BC that the story originates from. The same exact way there was a teacher/healer of judaism who started a reform movement within judaism and was put on a cross by romans. | ||
|   | 
|  02-27-2012, 04:10 PM | #65 | |
| Contributor Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: the fringe of the caribbean 
					Posts: 18,988
				 |   Quote: 
 The inquiry into the flood as stated in the Bible is independent of the 250 year old Quest for the Historical Jesus. No historical Jesus has been identified and can ONLY BE ASSUMED. Only a NON-historical Jesus has been positively IDENTIFIED in the NT. Myth Jesus, the Son of the Holy Ghost, God the Creator WALKED on the sea and Transfigured in the Canon. There is only ONE Jesus in the Canon--a non-historical Jesus. | |
|   | 
|  02-27-2012, 04:13 PM | #66 | |
| Contributor Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Barrayar 
					Posts: 11,866
				 |   Quote: 
 Once again, you've mistaken possibility for probability. | |
|   | 
|  02-27-2012, 04:14 PM | #67 | ||
| Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Auburn ca 
					Posts: 4,269
				 |   Quote: 
 yet you cannot prove he is mythical, nor make a decent case as of such. As well, jesus has 10X the amount of backing as a historical figure then most figures in history that are not up for debate. Myther's apply double standards to jesus | ||
|   | 
|  02-27-2012, 04:19 PM | #68 | |
| Contributor Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Falls Creek, Oz. 
					Posts: 11,192
				 |   Quote: 
  Amazon has for years sold a book called Jesus Potter Harry Christ: The World's Most Popular Literary Characters (or via: amazon.co.uk)   | |
|   | 
|  02-27-2012, 04:21 PM | #69 | ||
| Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Auburn ca 
					Posts: 4,269
				 |   Quote: 
 In this case the probablilities are certain, not only do we have a real flood and a real man in the flood, but we have sripture that in places is word for word with the Mesopotamian traditions   The flood in 2900 BC when the Euphrates overflowed and devistated the region is not up for debate my friend, the man who went down the swollen river is also on the known kings list. There is no debate the flood in 2900 BC started the sumerian legends that later ended up as the Gilgamesh epic. There is also no debate that Noahs flood in scripture is said to originate from Mesopotamia. There is also no debate that large amounts of Mesopotamians migrated to Israel after 1200 BC bringing these legends with them. Its why most of your early hebrew legends all have Mesopotamian origins. | ||
|   | 
|  02-27-2012, 04:22 PM | #70 | ||
| Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Auburn ca 
					Posts: 4,269
				 |   Quote: 
 becuase mythers always blow details out of porportion to fit their less then minority position. While missing the big picture all together | ||
|   | 
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
| 
 |