FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-24-2006, 08:32 PM   #31
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer
Which religion?
The one whose initially preserved theology is found in the christian testament.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer
I think the surviving emphasis on baptism in the early church indeed point to John the Baptist having some prominence, or at least his theology playing a crucial part.
I don't think you've answered my question!


spin
spin is offline  
Old 05-24-2006, 08:36 PM   #32
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
He was obviously important to some group in the 1st or 2nd century. Jay Raskin has some interesting speculation in his new book, Evolution of Christs and Christianities (or via: amazon.co.uk), that the stories about Jesus were originally told about John.
Let me ask the same in a slightly different manner: what purpose do you think the mention of John serves in the gospels? (It seems to me that you were imputing something when you said: "The only mention of John the Baptist outside of Christian sources is Josephus.")


spin
spin is offline  
Old 05-24-2006, 08:41 PM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
The one whose initially preserved theology is found in the christian testament.
If you mean the post-Pauline Christians, probably as a model for the messenger to herald the way of the Christ, I suppose taken from Isaiah. Also, they may have left the remnant of JtB as a way of one-up-manship, i.e. Jesus being praised as better than even John.

Quote:
I don't think you've answered my question!
I wasn't sure which group of Christians we were talking about.
Chris Weimer is offline  
Old 05-24-2006, 09:45 PM   #34
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin
...what purpose do you think the mention of John serves in the gospels?...
1. Response to a competing sect

2. Reinforcement of belief in Jesus as the Messiah
Amaleq13 is offline  
Old 05-24-2006, 11:32 PM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 1,027
Default

I think one likely explanation of John the Baptists's presence in Mark and Mark's dependents is Isaiah 40:3-5 and Malachi 3:1. If the narrative was at least partly constructed on the basis of the OT, which it almost certainly was, then this is certainly one example. Mark even quotes the passage he's using.

Of course, neither of the OT verses mention John by name, or give a detailed account like in Mark. But these passages (if you want to interpret them as prophecy of Jesus) demand that there be someone out in the wilderness presaging Jesus's arrival. For whatever reason, Mark wanted to use a historical figure from the right area, and John probably fit the bill. It's hard to comment too much because we don't know what reference Mark was using for his information about John.
sodium is offline  
Old 05-24-2006, 11:53 PM   #36
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 1,027
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13
1. Response to a competing sect

2. Reinforcement of belief in Jesus as the Messiah
#1 Maybe. But we don't have any real evidence that there ever was such a competing sect.
#2 But Mark doesn't really use it that way (except in relation to fulfilment of prophecy). The important point is the "Thou Art My Beloved Son" bit, but that could have come up in different contexts. I think it is probably important that Mark thinks Jesus needed to be baptized, though.

In John, of course, there's a long discussion about how John the Baptist is inferior to Jesus (and there's some of this in Luke and Matthew too). But that seems like a reaction to Mark. Mark probably thought nothing of having Jesus baptized, but obviously some Christians saw this as a big problem, as it could be taken as implying some superiority of John over Jesus. So they came up with all kinds of new dialogue to make everybody's roles much clearer.

But I think that if there was this big competition between John and Jesus, and this was originally meant as a response to a competing sect, then the problem would have been dealt with in some way at the beginning, with Mark. Mark didn't see a problem. Rather, Mark created the problem, which was later solved by the other gospels.
sodium is offline  
Old 05-25-2006, 12:48 AM   #37
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Quote:
Hawkingfan

Origin of Baptism
A few years ago, I had visited the Salem Witch Museum in Salem, Massachusetts. I enjoyed it very much. One of the most memorable things I read was on one of the displays on the wall in the anteroom near the front door (on its left if you’re looking at it from inside).

It concerned the origin of the concept of “drowning a witch”. It was practiced by the puritanical settlers of this country and to my surprise, had been in mankind’s superstitious practices for centuries. Pagans performed the ceremony against their “evil witches” far before Christianity.

But it also made the remarkable statement that the Pagan practice of drowning a witch is where the idea of baptism came from. All these things were based on the ancient Pagan belief that evil spirits cannot travel through water. If I remember correctly, a Pagan could protect himself from evil spirits if he dipped himself in water.

I was discussing this with someone the other day, telling them that the Christian baptism (submersion in water) was not a unique or original concept. When I wanted to find evidence for my claim (via the internet), I could not find anything anywhere about this specific issue.

Does anyone know of a book or website that specifically deals with this? Has anyone been to this museum and remember reading that? Or does anyone know anything about this topic?
http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=166416

Has there been any discussion that the baptism of Jesus was to wash away evil spirits from Jesus? Is it accepted that evil spirits don't like getting wet?

Is not the purpose of the John the Baptist stories to introduce Baptism to xianity? Are there any other sources for this practice? What does Paul say about Baptism?

(These comments are from someone who was "washed in the blood of the Lamb"!)
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 05-25-2006, 01:15 AM   #38
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
Default

Thinking about why John the Baptist is in the New Testament reminds me of legion and

http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=133673

Quote:
The Church of Santa Maria del Fiore
Been away in Tuscany and of course saw this!

I have not come across the tripartite structures of christian buildings before - a baptistry where you are welcomed into the church, the duomo where you spend your life with the church, the campanile where you contemplate heaven. Thinking about it, the classic English church is a shorthand for this in one building, instead of three.
Strange that a fudamental part of the architecture and ritual of the church - in catolicism the point of your salvation - seems to have such weak connections to the gospels. What is this fetish with water about?
Clivedurdle is offline  
Old 05-25-2006, 02:59 AM   #39
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clivedurdle
http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=166416

Has there been any discussion that the baptism of Jesus was to wash away evil spirits from Jesus? Is it accepted that evil spirits don't like getting wet?

Is not the purpose of the John the Baptist stories to introduce Baptism to xianity? Are there any other sources for this practice? What does Paul say about Baptism?

(These comments are from someone who was "washed in the blood of the Lamb"!)
Baptism was one of the major points of similarity that was recognized as the same as other pagan practices. That's what Tertullian wrote about, how the devil had spread the practise of baptisim ahead of Christianity.
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 05-25-2006, 04:05 AM   #40
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer
If you mean the post-Pauline Christians, probably as a model for the messenger to herald the way of the Christ, I suppose taken from Isaiah. Also, they may have left the remnant of JtB as a way of one-up-manship, i.e. Jesus being praised as better than even John.
My interest is that John is presumed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Weimer
I wasn't sure which group of Christians we were talking about.
Perhaps the term "christian testament" for what is commonly and presumptuously called the "new testament" is a little obscure, but it's a matter of politics: usually when something is "new" it's better or supercedes the "old".


spin
spin is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:20 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.