Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-24-2006, 08:32 PM | #31 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
Quote:
spin |
||
05-24-2006, 08:36 PM | #32 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
spin |
|
05-24-2006, 08:41 PM | #33 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
05-24-2006, 09:45 PM | #34 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
2. Reinforcement of belief in Jesus as the Messiah |
|
05-24-2006, 11:32 PM | #35 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 1,027
|
I think one likely explanation of John the Baptists's presence in Mark and Mark's dependents is Isaiah 40:3-5 and Malachi 3:1. If the narrative was at least partly constructed on the basis of the OT, which it almost certainly was, then this is certainly one example. Mark even quotes the passage he's using.
Of course, neither of the OT verses mention John by name, or give a detailed account like in Mark. But these passages (if you want to interpret them as prophecy of Jesus) demand that there be someone out in the wilderness presaging Jesus's arrival. For whatever reason, Mark wanted to use a historical figure from the right area, and John probably fit the bill. It's hard to comment too much because we don't know what reference Mark was using for his information about John. |
05-24-2006, 11:53 PM | #36 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 1,027
|
Quote:
#2 But Mark doesn't really use it that way (except in relation to fulfilment of prophecy). The important point is the "Thou Art My Beloved Son" bit, but that could have come up in different contexts. I think it is probably important that Mark thinks Jesus needed to be baptized, though. In John, of course, there's a long discussion about how John the Baptist is inferior to Jesus (and there's some of this in Luke and Matthew too). But that seems like a reaction to Mark. Mark probably thought nothing of having Jesus baptized, but obviously some Christians saw this as a big problem, as it could be taken as implying some superiority of John over Jesus. So they came up with all kinds of new dialogue to make everybody's roles much clearer. But I think that if there was this big competition between John and Jesus, and this was originally meant as a response to a competing sect, then the problem would have been dealt with in some way at the beginning, with Mark. Mark didn't see a problem. Rather, Mark created the problem, which was later solved by the other gospels. |
|
05-25-2006, 12:48 AM | #37 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Quote:
Has there been any discussion that the baptism of Jesus was to wash away evil spirits from Jesus? Is it accepted that evil spirits don't like getting wet? Is not the purpose of the John the Baptist stories to introduce Baptism to xianity? Are there any other sources for this practice? What does Paul say about Baptism? (These comments are from someone who was "washed in the blood of the Lamb"!) |
|
05-25-2006, 01:15 AM | #38 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London UK
Posts: 16,024
|
Thinking about why John the Baptist is in the New Testament reminds me of legion and
http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=133673 Quote:
|
|
05-25-2006, 02:59 AM | #39 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
|
Quote:
|
|
05-25-2006, 04:05 AM | #40 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
Quote:
spin |
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|