Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
04-14-2012, 12:44 PM | #21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
Here is chapter 11:
DCH |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
04-14-2012, 03:54 PM | #22 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 98
|
Thank you DCH, I'll have a look.
|
04-14-2012, 04:01 PM | #23 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 98
|
9:13 and 15 are a mess, basically then?
Even if we can't tell what the original said, it is odd that the terms "god of that world" and "Son" are used in 9:14 for the first time. There's certainly no mention of suffering or death in God's instructions in chap. 10. What do you think? |
04-14-2012, 10:07 PM | #24 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
Emma,
The phrase 'God of this world' is from 2 Cor. 4:4. What I find interesting are the overtly Christian portions (using NT terms such as Son of God or Only-begotten Son).
Funny thing is, all the rest of it (Chaps 6-11) is about a secret mission into an "alien world" to rescue those in Sheol (the grave), and this sounds Marcionite (cue Stephan Hüller). However, I am not aware of any examples of Marcionite pseudepigrapha that made use of OT figures like the Ascension of Isaiah does. Could it rather be reflecting a Gnostic Redeemer myth (cue the mythicists)? Gnostics definitely made use of pseudepigrapha to "market" their ideas to orthodox Christians. The commonalities with Marcionitism may just be due to them using variations of the same divine redeemer myth. What we may have, then, is a Christianized form of a Gnostic or Marcionite pseudepigraph (gawd do I love them big incomprehensible words). DCH Quote:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
04-15-2012, 04:30 AM | #25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 98
|
A lot of those details you think are Xian are very unstable textually, from the looks of it.
I don't see the original being Marcionite or Gnostic. What are you thinking of as belonging distinctively to either? Quote:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
04-15-2012, 03:45 PM | #26 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
Hi Emma,
Quote:
I also highlighted mention of Most High, God, Father, and Holy Spirit that are in these passages, although these terms also appear elsewhere in the Ascension of Isaiah without any overtly Christian connection. What I think it demonstrates, is that the overtly Christian terms are very often part of the text that is in E/L1 but NOT in S/L2. While Charles shows that there are indications that the Greek text underlaying S/L2 at times abbreviates a nearly identical Greek text that underlays E/L1, the number of passages in E/L1 that is not in S/L2 (which I had bracketed) is much more extensive than those few obvious cases. Either S/L2 substantially abbreviates the text behind E/L1, or the text of E/L1 substantially expands the text underlaying S/L2. What I was suggesting is that if E/L1 is an expansion of the text behind S/L2, then it may have been done in the interest of a Christian editor. Quote:
DCH |
||
04-15-2012, 08:47 PM | #27 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
|
Emma, there is a website on the AoI text here:
http://archive.org/details/cu31924014590529 The PDF on the website has the Ethiopic version, but it also points out those passages that appear or don't appear in the S/L ones. Since those details appear in footnotes, it's not easy to use for that purpose (DCH's posts above are much easier to follow). But it is a good resource to use, since it provides more information on how some of the passages are translated in the footnotes. |
04-15-2012, 11:34 PM | #28 | |||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Quote:
I do not wish to sidetrack this thread, so I will make only one post, the purpose of which is to attempt to better identify the "Seven Heavens" that are outlined in this text AoI (and in other texts associated with Christian origins, some of which are in the NHC). If you want to discuss any of this another thread may be appropriate, however I am still researching this issue, and in time may create a new thread myself. In the above I am making a reference to the knowledge of Greek astronomy that was known by Pythagoras and the ancient Greeks and referred to by Plato, such as in the following from WIKI: Quote:
BTW, also see the Antikythera mechanism QUESTION: Does anyone know of an ancient diagram for these concenric spheres, or layers, for the known Greek planets? (The above image is late) The Seven Heavens I am exploring the possibility that the seven heavens referred to the above list, renumbered from zero (for the Moon) to the 7th heaven being the universe of fixed stars (where the [universal] "One" dwells). There have been a number of discussions about the "Sub Lunar" realm, which as I see it, includes the moon and earth, and the true "heavens" only start further away from the moon. You said you like to try and think what it was that the ancients thought, or how they thought .... well I think the above stuff is a "guess" about the conceptual framework of antiquity on the "seven heavens". It was equivalent to their "best guesses and research at the time". It required mathematics and geometry to model, the Platonists were engaged in this stuff. I hope this answers your question. I am still reading about this, and will post another thread when I have reviewed more articles and other sources. Quote:
Pythagoras started this secrecy business thing .... need I elaborate further? |
|||
04-16-2012, 04:33 AM | #29 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mondcivitan Republic
Posts: 2,550
|
That website allows you to download an OCR'd scan of R H Charles' 1900 critical translation, which Emma has otherwise linked to via a web image version of this book. Unfortunately, the OCR quality is not so hot.
Peter Kirby has apparently scanned it and posted online a much better text of Charle's English translation. This is what I started with. The footnotes in Charles' translation, for the most part, identify variant readings between the Greek rescension reflected by Ethiopic/L1 versus the Greek rescension reflected by the S/L2 recension, and what I did was modify Charles' English translation to reflect what these two rescensions actually say. I also had to use Google translate to get the sense of some of the Latin text provided in the book's appendices, as sometimes Charles only says S"/L2 has a much fuller/smaller account, see page XXX." It won't be perfect, and as I noted before, I developed a couple errors in Charles' notes and more so in Peter's text (spelling and some omitted phrases). Gotta start work ... DCH Quote:
|
|
04-17-2012, 05:00 AM | #30 | |||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
|
Quote:
For instance it may not be interpolated, and it may not have been a composite amalgamation of authorship (as is currently suspected), but rather may have been written (similar to what is before us) in Greek for a purpose that is not yet clear to us. Quote:
I think that the "plain and simple" Christian rendition of just the one heaven (there are a few exceptions) is being capitalised upon by those who were privy to the understanding of multiple heavens. They therefore introduced into their version of the Jesus story an exposition of the Jesus figure descending not from "heaven", but from the "ONENESS of the 7th Heaven", through a sequence of other heavens, in accordance to their ideas of cosmology, as I have indicated in the above post # 28. Also see: GOSPEL OF BARTHOLOMEW From "The Apocryphal New Testament" M.R. James-Translation and Notes Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924 Quote:
I think if you are going to do any textual criticism you also need to examine other sources which are similar and attempt to establish possible hypotheses as to why we see any similar patterns of literary subject matter. |
|||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|