FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-25-2012, 11:04 PM   #21
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan View Post

Why don't you read it? Ehrman is playing the game that ToF correctly identities -- first he hacks on mythicists and constantly accuses them of bad faith and denial of reality. Then when people respond in kind he cries that he is the wounded one. The book's success depends on its social appeal. It's a clever book.

Vorkosigan
So, what bad things -- if anything -- does he say about the mythicists in his book?
Will you stop already, please. Either read the book or shut up. Some comments have already been posted to the thread.

Vorkosigan
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 04-25-2012, 11:39 PM   #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York, U.S.A.
Posts: 715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
So, what bad things -- if anything -- does he say about the mythicists in his book?
Will you stop already, please. Either read the book or shut up. Some comments have already been posted to the thread.

Vorkosigan
Can't deal with an uncomfortable question, can you?

Chaucer
Chaucer is offline  
Old 04-25-2012, 11:51 PM   #23
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaucer View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan View Post

Will you stop already, please. Either read the book or shut up. Some comments have already been posted to the thread.

Vorkosigan
Can't deal with an uncomfortable question, can you?

Chaucer
The question has been dealt with - asked and answered.
Toto is offline  
Old 04-25-2012, 11:57 PM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
The question has been dealt with - asked and answered.
Page 5 is the page which compares mythicists to Holocaust deniers.

Ehrman does say that no mythicist teaches New Testament in a western university.

Apparently, that is a really bad thing.

But I'm not quite sure why.
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 04-25-2012, 11:58 PM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdl View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes the Cynic View Post
Not in the book he doesn't. Nor does he compare Mythicists to birthers. He brings up the Birther thing only to make that point that hypothetically proving Obama was born in Kenya would not prove he didn't exist. He wasn't comparing mythers to birthers he was illustrating a specific kind of logical fallacy.
He appeals to consensus and then follows with a paragraph implying that anyone who dissents from that consensus is a conspiracy theorist who won't be convinced by any amount of evidence.
Still, as is clear from the avalanche of sometimes outraged postings on all the relevant Internet sites, there is simply no way to convince conspiracy theorists that the evidence for their position is too thin to be convincing and that the evidence for a traditional view is thoroughly persuasive. Anyone who chooses to believe something contrary to to evidence that an overwhelming majority of people find overwhelmingly convincing--whether it involves the fact of the Holocaust, the landing on the moon, the assassination of presidents, or even a presidential place of birth--will not be convinced. Simply will not be convinced.
I don't disagree here. SOME mythicists are like this. But is that the worst that Ehrman writes in his book about mythicists?
GakuseiDon is offline  
Old 04-26-2012, 12:00 AM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
So, what bad things -- if anything -- does he say about the mythicists in his book?
Will you stop already, please. Either read the book or shut up. Some comments have already been posted to the thread.
So, is that the worst that Ehrman writes about mythicists in his book? Nothing worse about Carrier or Dr Price or Doherty, for example?
GakuseiDon is offline  
Old 04-26-2012, 12:03 AM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
I don't disagree here. SOME mythicists are like this. But is that the worst that Ehrman writes in his book about mythicists?
Some mythicists are like that.

Just like some people will look at a drawing of a statue, insinuate that the author of the book drew it herself, claim no such statue existed, and then go on radio to say how the statue was 'completely made up' and laugh about it.

But the book was a lot better in tone than the Huffington Post article.

Only the arguments were outrageous, not the tone.
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 04-26-2012, 12:05 AM   #28
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Barrayar
Posts: 11,866
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan View Post

Will you stop already, please. Either read the book or shut up. Some comments have already been posted to the thread.
So, is that the worst that Ehrman writes about mythicists in his book? Nothing worse about Carrier or Dr Price or Doherty, for example?
See? I knew you'd be playing this stupid game. There's much much more. And no, no one is going to detail it for you so you can play this stupid game.
Vorkosigan is offline  
Old 04-26-2012, 12:08 AM   #29
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
Default

Go, Steven Carr! Go, and show them the strength of the mythicists' case! Why don't I see you showing Ehrman on his blog what's what? Go, go, go!
GakuseiDon is offline  
Old 04-26-2012, 12:09 AM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vorkosigan View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
So, is that the worst that Ehrman writes about mythicists in his book? Nothing worse about Carrier or Dr Price or Doherty, for example?
See? I knew you'd be playing this stupid game. There's much much more. And no, no one is going to detail it for you so you can play this stupid game.
Vork, all I am asking is for you to show me from Ehrman's book how he attacks the mythicists rather than the arguments. Please, won't you help me with that?
GakuseiDon is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:24 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.