FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-12-2005, 08:59 AM   #31
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 685
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Vestal
Then instead of hypothetical flaming letters, ask "what would it take to convert you to christianity." Then you'd get a much better idea of how set we are in our opinion.

For me, it would take two things: 1) some sort of clear supernatural evidence pointing to god, and 2) some sort of plausible explanation that gets him off the hook for the atrocities that the bible says he perpetuated.

What's so unreasonable about that?
Because often atheists say that they want physical proof of God's existence. Since this example gave physical proof, you added another criteria.

But actually, since I think Asha'man's post below is valid IMO, then new criteria is extraneous unless you want to add that you would worship this God as well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Asha'man
I think you missed my response.

There is a huge gulf between believing that God exists and believing that he wants/needs/deserves our worship.

While God could easily demonstrate that he exists, if he confirms that the atrocities of the HB are factual, and his behavior accurately described, then he has a long way to go before worship is justified.
You're right. I saw it but didn't think about it in this context.

Yes, I can see the two-step process now.

Fence
Fencesitter is offline  
Old 06-12-2005, 09:13 AM   #32
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Asha'man
...[G-d] has a long way to go before worship is justified.
That's just silly and plainly irrational. If the HB becomes "factual", then Sodom and Gomorah happend - and someone who can toss molten chunks of rocks from the heavens at cities has done all they need to to demonstrate the wisdom of worshiping them.
Wallener is offline  
Old 06-12-2005, 09:18 AM   #33
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 171
Default

Quote:
That’s a neat trick…hating something you don’t believe exists
No it isn't. Iv'e known tons of people who hated Christianity and God despite their lack of belief. In other words, I hate the concept of Allah and the Koran. What I was saying was that even if evidence was shown to me of Allah's existence I would deny it in any way I could think up. THis disturbs me because I don't like to think that I would react so irrationally.

Quote:
But if I found it was “real magic’ my fortune would be made!!! Never mind the Randi prize I’d get the Nobel Prize because I would have shown that everything we know about physics…hell, about every science…is wrong. Even 2+2=4 would have to be discarded once I demonstrated that magic is real. My picture would be on every front page.
It is not the nature of magic to be provable. Magic is neither logical or experimentally proven. My question is, could you find yourself believing in the magic I just described if you saw something spectacular enough occur?
TheBigKahoona is offline  
Old 06-12-2005, 09:35 AM   #34
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey, U.K.
Posts: 2,864
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wallener
That's just silly and plainly irrational. If the HB becomes "factual", then Sodom and Gomorah happend - and someone who can toss molten chunks of rocks from the heavens at cities has done all they need to to demonstrate the wisdom of worshiping them.
I heard somewhere that Sodom and Gomorrah were the victims of a massive landslide into the Dead Sea,-based on the local geology. Also molten chunks of rocks apparently falling onto cities from the heavens are well documented: they are known as volcanic eruptions.
Wads4 is offline  
Old 06-12-2005, 09:38 AM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Jersey, U.K.
Posts: 2,864
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBigKahoona
An atheist friend of mine asked me a tough question the other day and I thought I'd paraphrase it a little and see how atheists respond to the same question,
Atheists,

If you and two of your Atheist friends saw the message "The God of the Bible Exists" written in flaming letters on the moon and spelled out in the stars for ten minutes and then disappear, would you...

A. Convert to Christianity
B. Believe it to be some kind of twisted Christian conspiracy involving your fundie neighbors next door.
C. Blame it on the oysters you had for lunch
D. Carefully research collective delusions

I am not asking this question in order to bait people into the whole "rich man and lazarus debate". I am just interested because when I was posed with a similar question with the message, "The God of the Koran exists", I found myself leaning towards options B,C,and D even though they seem like irrational answers to me.
These hypothetical questions are much beloved by Christians, and are a complete waste of time. I will discuss them when something actually happens.
Wads4 is offline  
Old 06-12-2005, 09:40 AM   #36
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wads4
I will discuss them when something actually happens.
No, you won't, which is the point of this thread.
Wallener is offline  
Old 06-12-2005, 09:45 AM   #37
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: High Point, NC, USA
Posts: 1,506
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fencesitter
Because often atheists say that they want physical proof of God's existence. Since this example gave physical proof, you added another criteria.

But actually, since I think Asha'man's post below is valid IMO, then new criteria is extraneous unless you want to add that you would worship this God as well.



You're right. I saw it but didn't think about it in this context.

Yes, I can see the two-step process now.

Fence
Asha'man said it better than I did. There are actually many obstacles to converting to christianity.

First, there's believing that a god exists. For this, we need evidence (not "proof," but good evidence). It doesn't have to be dramatic, like flaming letters on the moon. That's what's often frustrating about this sort of conversation; there isn't even mundane evidence, so it's surrealistic to ask about my reaction in the face of overwhelming evidence. Mundane evidence, like a personal appearance, or like scientifically verifiable evidence of miracles, or like fulfilled prophecy (not prophecy that has to be rescued by post-hoc reinterpretation, rationalization, etc.).

Next, there's believing in the christian god. For this, we need some sort of evidence that the god as generally described by the bible is the supreme god, or the only god. If the bible could be shown to have supernatural properties, it could possibly be this evidence. Testimony of the deity itself, in the form of an appearance, might also suffice.

There is another hurdle: that of figuring out HOW to convert. As you know, debate rages throughout the christian community as to how one becomes a christian, what christianity entails, how one remains a christian, how one is saved, damned, how one worships, what "god" is, etc. There are huge factions that hold many different ideas about all of these issues. With which should we align ourselves?

Almost all of them claim to derive their understanding of these issues directly from the Bible. So, that presents another problem: what does the Bible say about it? Clearly, humanity itself is not capable of coming to any sort of agreement about what the bible says, so really, the deity itself needs to step in and clarify the matter. Its silence tacitly damns hundreds of millions of well-meaning, but wrong, souls.

Aside from all that, there's the last matter of whether the deity deserves worship. The bible often depicts the deity in the most starkly immoral light. It is not unreasonable to require that these questions be resolved prior to conversion.

Now, you may say that I'm piling on conditions. Try as I might, though, I can't see how any of these steps could reasonably be skipped before converting to christianity. Can you?
David Vestal is offline  
Old 06-12-2005, 09:46 AM   #38
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Switzerland.
Posts: 1,683
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBigKahoona
I understand that the question itself is quite silly. What I'm trying to get at is how rationally or irrationally we react to things that disprove or cast doubt on what we believe. Many people have pointed out the fact that Christians on this forum have been presented the facts which disprove their religion and yet still refuse to acknowledge the obvious. According to the Atheists on this forum, Christians give pitiful arguments and lose debate after debate concerning the big invisible pink unicorn. I'm not trying to fool anyone into belief. I'm simply trying to examine why people react so irrationally when they are shown evidence which disproves what they belive.



But if you witnessed something seemingly magical would it lead you to believe in magic or would you deny its authenticity?

If me and 2 of my friends saw an angel appear to us and tell us that "Allah is the one true God" I STILL might not believe in Allah simply because I hate him so much. I might say we all ate something odd for lunch. I might say that some swamp gas from mars exploded in front of me in the form of an angel, but I would not acknowledge Allah's existence. I find the fact that I would react in this way disturbing because it is so irrational.

So you don't believe Hitler existed either... Hmm, let me edumacate you. We atheists DO NOT hate god, because there is nothing to hate. I mean you don't hate Godzilla or the boogey man...
RussianM3_dude is offline  
Old 06-12-2005, 09:52 AM   #39
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: High Point, NC, USA
Posts: 1,506
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBigKahoona
No it isn't. Iv'e known tons of people who hated Christianity and God despite their lack of belief.
Surely you see the difference between hating a religion, and hating its nonexistent deity?


Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBigKahoona
It is not the nature of magic to be provable. Magic is neither logical or experimentally proven. My question is, could you find yourself believing in the magic I just described if you saw something spectacular enough occur?
There's no reason magic shouldn't be experimentally provable. If a person can (for example) levitate, why shouldn't they be able to do it again in a controlled setting?
David Vestal is offline  
Old 06-12-2005, 10:51 AM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: southeast
Posts: 2,526
Cool Only Choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wallener
That's just silly and plainly irrational. If the HB becomes "factual", then Sodom and Gomorah happend - and someone who can toss molten chunks of rocks from the heavens at cities has done all they need to to demonstrate the wisdom of worshiping them.
If the HB becomes "factual," then we also know that God is a psychopathic genocidal sociopath with delusions of grandeur. I'm morally incapable of worshiping a bully such as that.

First, if I was just going through the motions, he would presumably know, and I'm done for anyways.

Second, given his personality, I can in no way assume that I will get fair treatment even if I did worship him (or pretend to), so I might as well be honest about my feelings.

My only hope would be to side with his stated opponent, Satan. Apparently, Satan is able to give some form of protection to his worshipers, so that would be my only real hope.
Asha'man is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:37 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.