Freethought & Rationalism Archive

Loki · 04-30-2004, 08:19 AM

Wha'd Brimshack do to be deemed so important that his name cannot be mentioned? "He who must not be named?"

I, too, should not spend so much time there. Bad for my blood pressure. I think I'll return when the Catholics calm down a bit.

foolsparade · 05-02-2004, 12:20 PM

I got a semi, half, pre-empitive, warning of a possible warning in the future warning, the other day. Hell, I don't even post that much.

Gunnaheave · 05-03-2004, 01:44 AM

I told a mod she was biased in a public thread. The statement was entirely accurate, but a violation of rule # 7, of course. So, they skipped the warning system and banned me outright. Don't mention my name over there, at least not approvingly. They are handing out warnings for that now.

foolsparade · 05-04-2004, 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gunnaheave

I told a mod she was biased in a public thread. The statement was entirely accurate, but a violation of rule # 7, of course. So, they skipped the warning system and banned me outright. Don't mention my name over there, at least not approvingly. They are handing out warnings for that now.

Hmmm, I flat out told a mod she was wrong. I think they deleted the entire thread after that. I just wanted the mod and other christians to admit that the torture, and dehumanizing of other people was wrong. No exceptions. {regarding conduct of US personnel in Iraqi prisons}. Sometimes I think they should just close the open forum, they are getting spanked each hour it seems. They all are a bunch of fucking idiots IMO.

MediocrityInAction · 05-04-2004, 04:30 PM

I just got an official warning in the past 20 minutes. I did the mathematics, and found that the mods deleted my six hundred and sixty sixth post.

Smilin · 05-04-2004, 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gunnaheave

I told a mod she was biased in a public thread. The statement was entirely accurate, but a violation of rule # 7, of course. So, they skipped the warning system and banned me outright. Don't mention my name over there, at least not approvingly. They are handing out warnings for that now.

'He who's name must not be mentioned' Rule amendment to Rule 7, Subsection
42, line 23. :notworthy

Better yet, never call one of them a homophobe either. That'll
get you banned immediately and all posts deleted.

catalyst · 05-04-2004, 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gunnaheave

I told a mod she was biased in a public thread. The statement was entirely accurate, but a violation of rule # 7, of course. So, they skipped the warning system and banned me outright. Don't mention my name over there, at least not approvingly. They are handing out warnings for that now.

Who? Blindfaith?

Gunnaheave · 05-05-2004, 12:25 AM

Yep, it was Blindfaith. Job24 sent the notification.

foolsparade · 05-05-2004, 04:58 AM

Blindfaith is the one who whinned about me also, I'ddie4him sent me the pm. Actually his was fairly polite and reasonable. Sent a rebutal but he didn't respond to it. I have never had any contact with this mod. I hate his name however, I might have a name like I'ddie4mychildren or something.

MediocrityInAction · 05-05-2004, 04:58 AM

I can see why they warned me, and was half expecting it, but flesh99 has been throwing his weight around a lot since becoming a moderator. I get a feeling that he may be irritating a few of his fellow mods as well with his heavy-handedness.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

04-30-2004, 08:19 AM	#101
Loki Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Land of hippies and fog Posts: 2,075	Wha'd Brimshack do to be deemed so important that his name cannot be mentioned? "He who must not be named?" I, too, should not spend so much time there. Bad for my blood pressure. I think I'll return when the Catholics calm down a bit.

05-02-2004, 12:20 PM	#102
foolsparade Regular Member Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Pa. Posts: 226	I got a semi, half, pre-empitive, warning of a possible warning in the future warning, the other day. Hell, I don't even post that much.

05-03-2004, 01:44 AM	#103
Gunnaheave Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: AZ Posts: 3,250	I told a mod she was biased in a public thread. The statement was entirely accurate, but a violation of rule # 7, of course. So, they skipped the warning system and banned me outright. Don't mention my name over there, at least not approvingly. They are handing out warnings for that now.

05-04-2004, 04:30 PM	#105
MediocrityInAction Regular Member Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: U.K. Posts: 253	I just got an official warning in the past 20 minutes. I did the mathematics, and found that the mods deleted my six hundred and sixty sixth post.

05-05-2004, 12:25 AM	#108
Gunnaheave Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: AZ Posts: 3,250	Yep, it was Blindfaith. Job24 sent the notification.

05-05-2004, 04:58 AM	#109
foolsparade Regular Member Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Pa. Posts: 226	Blindfaith is the one who whinned about me also, I'ddie4him sent me the pm. Actually his was fairly polite and reasonable. Sent a rebutal but he didn't respond to it. I have never had any contact with this mod. I hate his name however, I might have a name like I'ddie4mychildren or something.

05-05-2004, 04:58 AM	#110
MediocrityInAction Regular Member Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: U.K. Posts: 253	I can see why they warned me, and was half expecting it, but flesh99 has been throwing his weight around a lot since becoming a moderator. I get a feeling that he may be irritating a few of his fellow mods as well with his heavy-handedness.

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.