FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-19-2003, 10:20 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Interpreting The Bible

Quote:
Originally posted by Skyfurnace
That question makes no sense. If something was proven, you wouldn't need to believe.

For instance, I wouldn't need to have faith to turn on the television. It has been proven to me that if I press "Power," the television will turn on. However, in your case, there is no proof of God's existence, thus it requires faith to believe in him. But like I said, if his existence was in fact proven, you wouldn't need faith to believe that he exists.
But Jesus performed miracles and people still didn't believe He was God. I should have clarified I guess and said, what makes you think with plenty of evidence, you would believe?

And of course, thats probably one reason God can't be proven. Would you really reject Him if you knew for a fact He existed, and Hell was your current fate? God doesn't want people to follow Him for the sole purpose of avoiding Hell. That isn't love, its following out of fear.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 09-19-2003, 10:30 PM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: US
Posts: 53
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Interpreting The Bible

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
But Jesus performed miracles and people still didn't believe He was God. I should have clarified I guess and said, what makes you think with plenty of evidence, you would believe?
I think I should bring this quote up for comparison:

Quote:
How do you check scientific claims? Do you go to the paleontology lab and perform radiometric dating on dinosaur bones yourself?
How do you know Jesus performed miricles? Do you go back in time and witness them for yourself?

Quote:
And of course, thats probably one reason God can't be proven. Would you really reject Him if you knew for a fact He existed, and Hell was your current fate? God doesn't want people to follow Him for the sole purpose of avoiding Hell. That isn't love, its following out of fear.
You're basically saying that God's existence shouldn't be proven because then people would simply follow him to avoid hell. Now, I hate to sound blunt, but it sounds kind of ironic that God wouldn't want his existence to be proven. That seems like a very clever way of saying, "God doesn't actually exist."
Skyfurnace is offline  
Old 09-19-2003, 11:35 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,197
Default Re: Re: Interpreting The Bible

Quote:
Magus55 wrote: [...]A bunch of Christians on RR say that their young children read the Bible, and then ask Jesus to save them. If a 4 year old can do it, an adult can too. [...]
I picked this part out because this kind of thing really rubs me the wrong way. There are a number of places in the bible where it talks about the ways of God being purposely foolish to confound the wise, and so forth, and then you hear stuff like this, about having to think like a 4 year old in order to believe the Bible. It's not only not convincing, in fact, it has the opposite effect, it just makes it all seem to me like deliberate lies. (Just as God intended for me, no doubt. ) <-- Hey, I finally took time to learn how to do a smiley

A 4 year old can believe in lots of things: Santa, the tooth fairy, the Easter Bunny, an imaginary friend. "If a 4 year old can do it, an adult can too." The fact that a 4 year old is capable of believing something doesn't say much about that something.
Godless Wonder is offline  
Old 09-20-2003, 02:13 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Innsmouth
Posts: 1,296
Post

Well, the average Rapture Ready Board member is at roughly the same intellectual level as the average 4-year old, so that doesn't really mean anything.
Mr. Neutron is offline  
Old 09-20-2003, 06:42 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: southeast
Posts: 2,526
Cool An Act of Desperation

Quote:
Originally posted by Barcode
Basically, I want to know why we are required to believe in advance. If God desires us to come to him, and he is the Bible God, then surely The Bible should be able to convince us as opposed to the other way around?
This is precisely my objection to the Bible itself, why I cannot accept that it has any form of divine guidance behind it. It is confusing, contradictory, vague, irrelevant, and subject to all forms of interpretation. In short, it displays every characteristic of a book written by man, and not one single characteristic of a book written by an omnimax entity.

A real holy book would provide answers to anyone who read it. A real holy book would provide consistent answers to all who read it. A real holy book would not be translated, since every reader would perceive the text in his own native language. A real holy book would clearly state the answers to important questions, not dance around the issue with vague unfulfilled prophecy and parables that are easily misunderstood. A real holy book would provide answers that are consistent with reality.

If God has a message to deliver, he has failed spectacularly to deliver it. 20,000 denominations of Christianity alone are rock solid proof of that, as are the 2/3rds of the people of Earth that are non-Christian.

I’m sure someone will bring up the free will defense (they always do), but I reject that utterly. If the Bible is what the Christians say it is, then it already destroys your free will. Alternately, it is impossible to make an honest decision if you don’t have all the information, a choice made in ignorance is not truly free.


The reason Christians say that we must believe in advance is simple: they have no choice. The Bible is clearly not a true holy book, the evidence for God is clearly non-existent. Only by brainwashing can you be convinced otherwise, so they try to make brainwashing into a good thing. It’s an act of desperation in the face of a reality that doesn’t agree with their beliefs.
Asha'man is offline  
Old 09-20-2003, 03:18 PM   #16
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: central USA
Posts: 434
Default early readers?

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55

A bunch of Christians on RR say that their young children read the Bible, and then ask Jesus to save them. If a 4 year old can do it, an adult can too.
Quote:
Originally posted by Godless Wonder

A 4 year old can believe in lots of things. . .

The part I have trouble believing is that a 4 year old can read the bible.
Amlodhi is offline  
Old 09-20-2003, 05:14 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
Default Re: early readers?

Quote:
Originally posted by Amlodhi
The part I have trouble believing is that a 4 year old can read the bible.
Yup they can, which doesn't lend itself very much to the reading ability of atheists. Guess being like a child is a virtue after all.
Magus55 is offline  
Old 09-20-2003, 05:46 PM   #18
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 356
Default

Maybe I'm just slow, but I was still learning the alphabet and everything when I was 4. I also thought Jesus was a woman for awhile, at least until I started sunday school at 6 or so, but those memories are a bit foggy.
Abel Stable is offline  
Old 09-21-2003, 01:40 AM   #19
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: American in China
Posts: 620
Default Re: Re: early readers?

Quote:
Originally posted by Magus55
Yup they can, which doesn't lend itself very much to the reading ability of atheists. Guess being like a child is a virtue after all.
I read the Bible when I was 4 or 5, but it was a children's Bible. Even then I didn't really understand it, and by the time I was 8 or 9, I had already forgotten most of the stories. You just show me a 4 year-old who can define half the words used in the Bible, and I'll be impressed.
conkermaniac is offline  
Old 09-21-2003, 02:52 AM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: alaska
Posts: 2,737
Default best book

The bible,to this date still is a lode of redacted,revised,edited,catholic fish shit.
pices.

bleubird
bleubird is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:57 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.