FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-16-2013, 12:03 PM   #11
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: NW United States
Posts: 155
Default

Atwill's take on Paul

"To digress, this analysis shows not only the reason why the Romans named the character ‘Paul’, but why they gave him his original name of ‘Saul’. Saul was the Jewish king that had demanded David obtain ‘a hundred Gentile foreskins’ and the Romans named their character ‘Saul’ to imply that his ‘circumcision’ involved – like the one ordered by his OT ‘forerunner’ – more than a single foreskin. The author of Acts ‘clarifies’ the relationship by actually mentioning the OT Saul in the passage where ‘Saul’ becomes ‘Tiny’ – Acts 13:21. The author also notes that the OT Saul’s reign had the space of forty years. This ‘foresees’ the forty years between the beginning of Paul’s ‘ministry’ at approximately 40 CE and the start of Domitian’s reign in 81 CE – a roughly forty year cycle parallel to the one which linked Jesus to Titus."
http://caesarsmessiah.com/blog/2013/...rand/#more-229
jdboy is offline  
Old 04-16-2013, 12:14 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

No, but that wasn't even what I was questioning in my last posting.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Onias View Post
Duvduv,
Have you considered that Paul might be derived from 'Saulus" of whom Josephus wrote?
Duvduv is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:01 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.