FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-20-2005, 06:36 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: American by birth, Southern by the grace of God!
Posts: 2,657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Killer Mike
If they were so convinced god existed they would not react with so much anger.

But dissociative pathologies allows one to believe something that deep down inside they know is not true. And cognitive dissonance sets in when confronted with something that poses a challenge.
Ah, the old, "what is wrong with these crazy theists? Well, I'll tell you what's wrong...they're mentally ill!" strawman thread. Which I think is maybe apropos, since theists think you guys are are spiritually ill.

I suppose the rubber meets the road at who gets to validate their theory objectively.

Unfortunately, historically, when the eradication of of either of these "illnesses" have been attempted by Mankind, the results have been less than appealing...
jdlongmire is offline  
Old 02-20-2005, 06:39 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: PA USA
Posts: 5,039
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jagella
As many of you no doubt are aware, the antiquated notions of gods and miracles have come under the scrutiny of modern science. Now that we know that the earth is 4.6 billion years old and the universe several times older, the age-old myths of Genesis and other creation legends no longer hold much credibility for people educated in modern evolutionary science. Nevertheless, many people still maintain belief in some god or other as well as belief in miracles. Why are these beliefs still with us? I’ve decided to start a discussion regarding the resiliency of religious belief, and in particular I wish to discuss religion as mental illness...
I do have a BIL in his early 40s who suffered brain damage at birth. He has the mental capacity of a 2-3 year old child, and his belief in the Santa and Easter Bunny fables is rock solid. He no doubt believes the God fable similarly, judging from his behavior.

Absolutely no one has ever told him that these things are just stories. The presents continue to arrive, the cookies get eaten, the carrots get eaten, Santa comes and goes leaving presents, etc, so the myth gets maintained. Is it any mystery then that he willingly and happily maintains belief in these things?

As far as mental impairment goes, developing children who believe in Santa are not mentally impaired. Good proof that they are not mentally impaired might just as well be that they jettison Santa belief quite readily while still children. It’s the reasons they willingly maintain and reject Santa belief that are important, and I maintain that these reasons in very large part have nothing to do with an actual “Santa.�? The deconversion is too sudden to make that an accurate observation. They didn’t just suddenly get over any mental impairment, and nor did they do any in-depth study of “Twas the Night before Christmas.�?

It seems to me anyway that children obey a social imperative against questioning Santa belief, and then quickly replace it with a social imperative in support of non-belief. Certainly it has to do with knowledge, but in my experience I never met a child who was maintaining an agnostic position about Santa’s possible existence. We would probably see agnosticism about Santa as possibly demonstrating mental impairment. The fact is that kids deconvert, and they do it quickly.
joedad is offline  
Old 02-20-2005, 11:08 AM   #13
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Williamsport, PA
Posts: 484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozymandias
I was unaware of this correlation between intelligence and atheism -- can you point me to wherever you got this information?
I’m very glad you asked. To be perfectly honest, I was basing my opinion on personal experience and observation that there appears to be an inverse correlation between educational level attained and religiosity. I should also point out that I don’t mean to confuse intelligence with education. I was referring to education above rather than intelligence.

Nevertheless, I’ve found some fascinating studies that seem to confirm that greater intelligence means lesser religiosity. Consider the following findings:

Quote:
C. Plant and E. Minium, 1967
The more intelligent students were less religious, both before entering college and after 2 years of college.

Norman Poythress, 1975
Mean SATs for strongly antireligious (1148), moderately anti-religious (1119), slightly antireligious (1108), and religious (1022).

Wiebe and Fleck, 1980
Studied 158 male and female Canadian university students. They reported "nonreligious S's tended to be strongly intelligent" and "more intelligent than religious S's."
Fascinating, is it not? I believe such research findings are worthy of another thread in this forum. You can read more about the link between atheism and higher intelligence at:

http://www.objectivethought.com/atheism/iqstats.html

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozymandias
My personal experience has not led to any decisive conclusion one way or the other -- I know many very intelligent people who are Christian and many who are not.
Of course you will find some exceptions to the apparent rule. No doubt some atheists’ brains could use a tune-up, and many theists are very intelligent. Isaac Newton, for example, was devoutly religious yet he may have been one of the smartest people who ever lived.

Jagella
Jagella is offline  
Old 02-20-2005, 11:22 AM   #14
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Williamsport, PA
Posts: 484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBigKahoona
I think its kind of foolish to equate religion with mental illness. How many times have you had a totally insane dream?
I have weird dreams almost every night, but I never meant to imply that weird dreams mean that the dreamer is mentally ill. Mental illness, in my amateurish opinion, refers to any thoughts or feelings a person has that are at variance with the obvious state of reality. After my experiences with religion, I must conclude that many of the basic beliefs in religion have little to do with reality. Hence, I noted the similarities between mental illness and religiosity.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBigKahoona
…Religious belief is the natural tendency of man.
If so, then my post above explaining that there may be a biological basis for religion would be correct. Nevertheless, we need to be careful what we deem to be “the natural tendency of man.�? Millions of people today are atheists, and I can tell you that atheism comes natural for me. Besides, if religion is so “natural,�? then why do most religions spend a lot of time indoctrinating children?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBigKahoona
In this context do you consider mental illness to be "A belief in something incredibly nonsensical and stupid."
I believe that might fit my definition of mental illness, but I must reiterate that I’m no psychologist.

Jagella
Jagella is offline  
Old 02-20-2005, 11:26 AM   #15
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Williamsport, PA
Posts: 484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdlongmire
…theists think you guys are are spiritually ill.
What does it mean to be “spiritually ill�??

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdlongmire
Unfortunately, historically, when the eradication of of either of these "illnesses" have been attempted by Mankind, the results have been less than appealing...
Please don’t leave us hanging here. Can you elaborate on how history demonstrates that the lack of religious belief leads to those unappealing results?

Jagella
Jagella is offline  
Old 02-20-2005, 11:34 AM   #16
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Williamsport, PA
Posts: 484
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joedad
The presents continue to arrive, the cookies get eaten, the carrots get eaten, Santa comes and goes leaving presents, etc, so the myth gets maintained. Is it any mystery then that he willingly and happily maintains belief in these things?
It’s no mystery, and if I received what I wanted, then maybe I’d be more likely to believe in some god or other.

Quote:
Originally Posted by joedad
It seems to me anyway that children obey a social imperative against questioning Santa belief, and then quickly replace it with a social imperative in support of non-belief.
If there’s anything that might break religiosity in even the most devout person, I believe it may be a “social imperative.�? It’s no coincidence that religionists seek out other believers. Their faith is bolstered by knowing that other people believe what they do. If such social support of religious beliefs was lacking, then I submit that religion might very well wane.

Jagella
Jagella is offline  
Old 02-20-2005, 01:03 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,033
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdlongmire
Ah, the old, "what is wrong with these crazy theists? Well, I'll tell you what's wrong...they're mentally ill!" strawman thread. Which I think is maybe apropos, since theists think you guys are are spiritually ill.

I suppose the rubber meets the road at who gets to validate their theory objectively.

Unfortunately, historically, when the eradication of of either of these "illnesses" have been attempted by Mankind, the results have been less than appealing...
Actually psychological pathologies are a continum. Nobody is suggesting all theists are like Charles Manson. But Oxford University Press published "Religion and Mental Health" about 3-4 years ago, containing several articles by college professors. There is a direct correlation with the level of "religiousity" with the level of neurosis. In other words the more religious the more neurotic. But a word of caution in all fairness, psychologists do acknowledge a certain level of neurosis is not necessarily bad, provided it helps someone cope with lifes stresses and does not interfere with their ability to live productive lives. Like a child who has a made up friend, theism is a coping mechanism. But technically it is a form of mental illness.
Killer Mike is offline  
Old 02-20-2005, 01:23 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: American by birth, Southern by the grace of God!
Posts: 2,657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jagella
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdlongmire
Unfortunately, historically, when the eradication of of either of these "illnesses" have been attempted by Mankind, the results have been less than appealing...

Please don’t leave us hanging here. Can you elaborate on how history demonstrates that the lack of religious belief leads to those unappealing results?
Jagella
Concerning...the Soviet Union, the present say "Republic" of China, North Korea, The "Republic" of Vietnam and numerous lesser officially atheist governments such as held Poland, Hungary and Romania.

Some stats

...and besides, I didn't say the lack of religious belief lead to anything, it is when certain beliefs or lack of beliefs are framed as criminal, detrimental to the State or an illness that needs treatment that mass murders begin.
jdlongmire is offline  
Old 02-20-2005, 01:35 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: American by birth, Southern by the grace of God!
Posts: 2,657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Killer Mike
Actually psychological pathologies are a continum. Nobody is suggesting all theists are like Charles Manson. But Oxford University Press published "Religion and Mental Health" about 3-4 years ago, containing several articles by college professors. There is a direct correlation with the level of "religiousity" with the level of neurosis. In other words the more religious the more neurotic. But a word of caution in all fairness, psychologists do acknowledge a certain level of neurosis is not necessarily bad, provided it helps someone cope with lifes stresses and does not interfere with their ability to live productive lives. Like a child who has a made up friend, theism is a coping mechanism. But technically it is a form of mental illness.
suuure, and all "true" atheists lack any neuroses...

That is such a strawman bunch of pseudo scientific horse hockey...

Wow, and maybe most had brown eyes, too...maybe brown eyes are a good predictor of mental illness!!!

Please post a link to this article.
jdlongmire is offline  
Old 02-20-2005, 01:42 PM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: the internets
Posts: 1,198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdlongmire
Concerning...the Soviet Union, the present say "Republic" of China, North Korea, The "Republic" of Vietnam and numerous lesser officially atheist governments such as held Poland, Hungary and Romania.

Some stats

...and besides, I didn't say the lack of religious belief lead to anything, it is when certain beliefs or lack of beliefs are framed as criminal, detrimental to the State or an illness that needs treatment that mass murders begin.
I always find it interesting how these atheist regimes are brought up to knock down atheism. (I realize that wasn't your point here. I am thinking more of the unfortunate day that I caught 10 minutes of Hannity and Colmes.) As though it is atheism itself that is the root of the problem. But the real horrors come when belief or unbelief is forced on the unwiling.
GoodLittleAtheist is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:29 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.