FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-06-2006, 11:50 AM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA, Missouri
Posts: 3,070
Default

Thanks Pharoah. It is helpful.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaleq13
I think he is suggesting that calculations of name frequency are less significant than the context in which the name occurs. The fact that a name is appropriate for the role does not require fabrication but makes it possible. The fact that a name was common really tells us absolutely nothing about whether the author deliberately chose it.
Ok, but if 100% of all names are appropriate for the role that tells us absolutely nothing about whether the author deliberately chose it also, would you agree? As such, it makes sense to get an idea of the frequency as well as the level of appropriateness of the name in question as well as competing names.

Pharoah's recommended site says that Joshua means "the Lord is my salvation". That sounds less "Messiac" than a name that means "I am your salvation" or "Savior". One could argue that it is even less appropriate a name for the Christ than one of the common ones that means "gift from God", since "gift from God" is a meaning applied to the person, whereas "the Lord is my salvation" puts the act of salvation onto God, and not the person.

ted
TedM is offline  
Old 02-06-2006, 11:58 AM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

During the James ossuary to-do, before the forgery had been established, there were calculations of the probability that "Ya'akov, son of Yosef, brother of Yeshua" could be tied to the Biblical Jesus son of Joseph brother of James. There are still some references around: from here
Quote:
Biblical Archaeology Review on the frequency of the names: "The names James (Jacob), Joseph, and Jesus were all fairly common among Jews at the turn of the era. ...Rachel Hachlili has studied names used at this time in all types of inscriptions. Joseph appeared in 14 percent, Jesus in 9 percent, and James/Jacob in 2 percent of the cases. ...in Jerusalem during the two generations before 70 C.E., there were therefore about twenty people who could be called 'Jacob son of Joseph brother of Jesus.'" . . .
Toto is offline  
Old 02-06-2006, 12:01 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bordeaux France
Posts: 2,796
Default

Philip is greek, Phil = friend, Hippos = horse, friend of horses.
Bartholomew hebrew or aramaïc.
Huon is offline  
Old 02-06-2006, 12:09 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA, Missouri
Posts: 3,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto
During the James ossuary to-do, before the forgery had been established, there were calculations of the probability that "Ya'akov, son of Yosef, brother of Yeshua" could be tied to the Biblical Jesus son of Joseph brother of James. There are still some references around: from here
Thanks. That's a good idea to look into frequency. Not that it matters since the inscription is likely fake, but I hope no one was concluding that on the above basis there was only a 1/20 chance that it was referring to THE James. I'd say more likely 99%, since it would be highly unusual to mention the person's brother--indicating that the brother was of great importance. No matter anyway...

ted
TedM is offline  
Old 02-06-2006, 12:19 PM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,307
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TedM
Thanks. That's a good idea to look into frequency. Not that it matters since the inscription is likely fake, but I hope no one was concluding that on the above basis there was only a 1/20 chance that it was referring to THE James. I'd say more likely 99%, since it would be highly unusual to mention the person's brother--indicating that the brother was of great importance. No matter anyway...
Since it is a recent forgery, there's a 100% chance it was referring to THE James.
S.C.Carlson is offline  
Old 02-06-2006, 12:43 PM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA, Missouri
Posts: 3,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by S.C.Carlson
Since it is a recent forgery, there's a 100% chance it was referring to THE James.
Yes, that would be the conclusion. It's nice to be able to forgoe calculations altogether for a change My 99% was suspending judgement on the case, and was based on the belief that brothers were rarely mentioned on ossuaries.
TedM is offline  
Old 02-06-2006, 01:55 PM   #17
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Arizona
Posts: 196
Default

I did not see anyone mention that Joshua (Hebrew) and Jesus (latinized from the Greek) are essentially the same name. They were common names. There seems to be little ammo here to conclude that "Jesus" was chosen to create the myth even though it fits the context. In the biblical context it had would have had the most influence to Joseph in his decision whether to support Mary or not. I am trying to imagine if other names would have been even more suspect like Elijah or David?
mdarus is offline  
Old 02-06-2006, 02:00 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: home
Posts: 3,715
Default

Another approach to the question of how common certain names were would be to see which names appear in written sources from the period (and how broadly would you define that?) You would need to consider variants in spelling and transliteration, though. Joseph can be Yosef, Yossei, Yosi, Jose etc. John is Yochanan. Simon is Shimon or Shimeon.

For instance, if you look at the Hasmonean family (2nd century BCE):
"[1] In those days arose Mattathias the son of John, the son of Simeon, a priest of the sons of Joarib, from Jerusalem, and dwelt in Modin.
[2] And he had five sons, Joannan, called Caddis:
[3] Simon; called Thassi:
[4] Judas, who was called Maccabeus:
[5] Eleazar, called Avaran: and Jonathan, whose surname was Apphus." (1Mac:2)

Mattathias = Matthew (means 'gift of God')
John, Joannan = Yochanan (means 'graces by God')
Simeon, Simon (hearkened?)
Judas = Judah, Yehuda (praised)
Elazar = Lazarus (God has helped)
Jonathan = Yonathan, Yehonathan (God has given)

I'm not sure about Joarib, because I can't remember the Hebrew spelling, but if it's Yehoyariv, then it would translate as 'God will fight'.

Or if you look at the Rabbis quoted in Pirkei Avoth - Ethics of the fathers, which has names of many Rabbis from 3rd century BCE to 3rd century CE - see Ethics of the Fathers for a translation or Pirke Avot Study for translation with footnotes, including biographical info.

Shimon (English equivalent Simon) (The Rightous, ben Shetach, ben Gamaliel, ben Natanel, ben Elazar, ben Zoma, ben Azzai and ben Yochai, ben Judah, ben Menasya - 10 different people)

Antigonus (of Socho)

Yosi (English - Joseph) (ben Yoezer of Tzeredah, ben Yochanan of Jerusalem, the Priest, father of Yishmael, bar Judah of Kefar ha-Bavli, ben Kisma - 6 people)

Yoezer (of Tzeredah - father of Yosi)

Yochanan (English John)(father of Yosi, ben Zakkai, ben Baroka, the sandal maker, ben Bag-Bag - 5 people)

Joshua (ben Perachyah, ben Chananiah, ben Levi - 3 people)

Perachyah

Nittai (the Arbelite)

Judah (ben Tabbai, the Prince, of Kefar ha-Bavli, ben Ilai, ben Teima, father of Shimon - 6 people)

Tabbai

Shemayah

Avtalion

Hillel

Shammai

Gamaliel (grandson of Hillel, son of Judah the Prince - 2 people, but in the same lineage)

Eliezer (Lazarus) (ben Hyrcanus, ben Jacob)

Hyrcanus (father of Eliezer, father of Dosa)

Chananiah

Netanel

Eleazar (Lazarus)(ben Arach, of Bartota, of Modiim, ben Azaryah, ben Chisma, ben Shammua, father of Shimon, ha-Kappar - 8 people)

Arach

Abba

Shaul

Tarfon

Akavya (ben Mahalalel)

Mahalalel

Chanina (an assistant of the high priest, ben Chachinai, ben Dosa - 3 people)

Chananiah (ben Teradion)

Teradion

Yochai

Chachinai

Nechunya (ben Hakanah)

Hakanah (? - this might be a nickname)

Chalafta (ben Dosa of Kefar Chanania)

Dosa (of Kefar Chanania, father of Chanina, ben Hyrcanus - 3 people)

Jacob (no attribute and father of Eliezer)

Dostai (ben Yannai)

Yannai

Meir

Yishmael (no attributes and son of Yosi)

Akiva

Azaryah

Chisma

Zoma

Azzai

Levitas (of Yavneh)

Baroka

Tzadok

Yonatan

Shammua

Ilai

Nehorai

Matya (ben Cheresh or Charash)

Cheresh/Charash

Samuel (the Younger)

Elisha (ben Avuyah)

Avuyah

Teima

(ben Bag-Bag, ben Heh-Heh = code names for sons of converts)

Levi

Menasya

Kisma

------------
Thus the most common name on the list is Shimon (Simon) - with 10 instances, followed by Eleazar (Lazarus)(8), Yosi (Joseph) and Judah (the same as Judas) 6 instances each, Yochanan (John) - 5, and Joshua, Chanina and Dosa with 3 instances each. Of course a longer text such as the entire Mishna or Josephus (another Joseph) would be better for statistics.

A comment regarding Hebrew names: Many Hebrew names mention God in some way. YHWH appears as the prefix Yo-, Yeho-, or Jo- or as the suffix -ya or -yahu. El-, Eli- can be a prefix or -el a suffix. Thus the meaning 'God has graced' can be expressed in the names Yochanan (John), Hanania (also spelled Chanania), Hananel and Elhanan. Since Jesus is a variant of Joshua, you can see it contains a prefix referring to God. The names Yeshayahu (Isaiah) and Elisha also have the same meaning.
Anat is offline  
Old 02-06-2006, 02:02 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: home
Posts: 3,715
Default

mdarus, I don't recall anyone by the name of David from Mishnaic sources, so I don't think the name was in fashion at the time.
Anat is offline  
Old 02-06-2006, 02:16 PM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdarus
I did not see anyone mention that Joshua (Hebrew) and Jesus (latinized from the Greek) are essentially the same name. They were common names. There seems to be little ammo here to conclude that "Jesus" was chosen to create the myth even though it fits the context. In the biblical context it had would have had the most influence to Joseph in his decision whether to support Mary or not. I am trying to imagine if other names would have been even more suspect like Elijah or David?
The LXX consistently translates both Yehoshua (Joshua) and Yeshua (the temple builder in Ezra) as Iesous. Jesus in the gospels could have been either one, but Yeshua was more common and thus more likely.
Chris Weimer is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:02 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.