FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-22-2010, 08:41 PM   #41
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by judge View Post
Sorry, on this board we deal with evidence. Let me know when you have evidence that demonstrates it is unambiguous.
The evidence is the milieu in which the gospels were written, where the god of thunder, Jupiter, was the predominant god in the culture. I suppose I could provide you copies of ancient texts demonstrating this, but would it matter?

If you want to simply accuse me of being a fundy for drawing ordinary conclusions, ok, I'm a fundy. You can move on with your life now.
spamandham is offline  
Old 09-22-2010, 10:01 PM   #42
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ireland
Posts: 58
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
"Sons of Thunder" is an unambiguous reference to prodigy of Jupiter. Only a fundamentalist would deny a simple and straightforward observation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by judge View Post
Sorry, on this board we deal with evidence. Let me know when you have evidence that demonstrates it is unambiguous.
It's the simplest explanation for the otherwise inexplicable language used by the writers. The demand for scientific rigour is just so far beyond the pale in a field that deals almost entirely with ambiguous evidence. Most things in biblical studies are decided by a best-fit approach, and this happens to be this best fit. Unless you're hiding something.
dizzy is offline  
Old 09-22-2010, 10:26 PM   #43
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

I think the thunder/Jupiter connection advocates should look at the Jewish literature first and then related materials. The Jewish god is frequently connected with thunder, Ex 9:23, 1 Sam 2:10, 12:18, Job 26:14, Isa 29:6, etc. The 10 commandments were given amid thunder and lightning. God's voice is thunder (Ps 104.7). Yahweh's position in Israel was equivalent to that of Baal in Canaan -- Baal the storm god. Is there any necessary reason to seek outside the Jewish context to explain a connection with thunder?


spin
spin is offline  
Old 09-22-2010, 10:47 PM   #44
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

If the thunder is Yahweh, are James and John sons of Yahweh?

Justin Martyr works the Dioscuri into his First Apology:

Quote:
CHAPTER XXI -- ANALOGIES TO THE HISTORY OF CHRIST.

And when we say also that the Word, who is the first-birth of God, was produced without sexual union, and that He, Jesus Christ, our Teacher, was crucified and died, and rose again, and ascended into heaven, we propound nothing different from what you believe regarding those whom you esteem sons of Jupiter. For you know how many sons your esteemed writers ascribed to Jupiter: Mercury, the interpreting word and teacher of all; AEsculapius, who, though he was a great physician, was struck by a thunderbolt, and so ascended to heaven; and Bacchus too, after he had been torn limb from limb; and Hercules, when he had committed himself to the flames to escape his toils; and the sons of Leda, and Dioscuri; . . .
Toto is offline  
Old 09-22-2010, 11:13 PM   #45
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Italy
Posts: 708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post

I think the thunder/Jupiter connection advocates should look at the Jewish literature first and then related materials. The Jewish god is frequently connected with thunder, Ex 9:23, 1 Sam 2:10, 12:18, Job 26:14, Isa 29:6, etc. The 10 commandments were given amid thunder and lightning. God's voice is thunder (Ps 104.7). Yahweh's position in Israel was equivalent to that of Baal in Canaan -- Baal the storm god. Is there any necessary reason to seek outside the Jewish context to explain a connection with thunder?


spin
.
I think you are closer to the nub of the problem ... Try also see into Qumran's literature. In a text, as reported by R. Eisenman, you deals with the theme of the 'Thunder' ... ('Brontologium')


Greetings


Littlejohn

.
Littlejohn is offline  
Old 09-23-2010, 01:54 AM   #46
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ireland
Posts: 58
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
Is there any necessary reason to seek outside the Jewish context to explain a connection with thunder?
Is there any reason to prefer Jewish aetiology to pagan aetiology?
dizzy is offline  
Old 09-23-2010, 04:09 AM   #47
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dizzy View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
Is there any necessary reason to seek outside the Jewish context to explain a connection with thunder?
Is there any reason to prefer Jewish aetiology to pagan aetiology?
Obviously, that will depend on your perspective. If you think the christian literature has nothing to do with a Jewish background then of course you can let your imagination run riot.


spin
spin is offline  
Old 09-23-2010, 04:20 AM   #48
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,579
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by judge View Post
...

Sorry, on this board we deal with evidence. Let me know when you have evidence that demonstrates it is unambiguous.
What is your alternative possibility?
See eg. Michael Turton's commentary and link to Mk 3:17.

Jiri
Solo is offline  
Old 09-23-2010, 07:30 AM   #49
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ireland
Posts: 58
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
Obviously, that will depend on your perspective. If you think the christian literature has nothing to do with a Jewish background then of course you can let your imagination run riot.
I don't think that at all. I think there is a dual influence from both pagan and Jewish ideas, and I'm curious why you think the latter should be shown preference in this case.
dizzy is offline  
Old 09-23-2010, 07:40 AM   #50
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solo View Post
See eg. Michael Turton's commentary and link to Mk 3:17.

Jiri
This is extremely speculative, and is not a valid analysis. It's the equivalent of analyzing the original Superman movie to figure out what the author of the original Superman series meant.
spamandham is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:37 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.