FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-17-2006, 08:29 AM   #11
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 7th Heaven
Posts: 406
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kosh
You're lecturing me on SOP after just 236 posts?
I was not lecturing before, simply making a statement.

You just did the same thing I did and didn't even realize it. What in the world is SOP? Can I have something to explain that?

Oh, nevermind, after just a little bit of research, I think it must be either "Standard Operating Procedure" or "Standard Of Proof". Probably the former, correct?

The number of posts, obviously, has nothing to do with what you know and what you do not know.
Phlox Pyros is offline  
Old 04-17-2006, 09:08 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Let's stay on topic here, and ignore derails.

There must be a serious amount on info around in ancient texts on the Trojan War. Does anyone recall expressions of scepticism about it?

The Plutarch is interesting, as indicating that the ancients had a clear idea of the concept of the horizon of history, before when only poets' ideas existed.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 04-19-2006, 11:21 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

One of the best books on this is Paul Veyne's "Did the Greeks believe in their myths ? (or via: amazon.co.uk)"

To grossly oversimplify Veyne argues that educated people in the Ancient World were aware that large parts of the Iliad and Odyssey were not literally true but they were reluctant to regard their legends as sheer fiction, preferring to see them as hyped up imaginative retellings of real events.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 04-19-2006, 11:33 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N/A
Posts: 4,370
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewcriddle
One of the best books on this is Paul Veyne's "Did the Greeks believe in their myths ? (or via: amazon.co.uk)"

To grossly oversimplify Veyne argues that educated people in the Ancient World were aware that large parts of the Iliad and Odyssey were not literally true but they were reluctant to regard their legends as sheer fiction, preferring to see them as hyped up imaginative retellings of real events.
Thank you -- this is interesting. It would also fit in with the approach that Eusebius of Caesarea takes towards Apollonius of Tyana in Contra Hieroclem and his general position that Greek deities were originally men.

All the best,

Roger Pearse
Roger Pearse is offline  
Old 04-19-2006, 11:56 AM   #15
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hallq
Question: to what extent did people of Jesus' era believe such national epics as the Odyssey and the Aeneid? If the common people did, it would betray a great willingness to uncritically accept legends, but are there scholars who would dispute this?
From TATIAN'S ADDRESS TO THE GREEKS Chapter 21 here.

Quote:
Prometheus, fastened to Caucasus, suffered punishment for his good deeds to men. According to you, Zeus is envious, and hides the dream from men, wishing their destruction. Wherefore, looking at your own memorials, vouchsafe us your approval, though it were only as dealing in legends similar to your own. We, however, do not deal in folly, but your legends are only idle tales.
DramaQ is offline  
Old 04-20-2006, 03:59 PM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the torture chambers of Pinochet's Chile
Posts: 2,112
Default

Quote:
A bit before Jesus, Plato and company believed the Homeric epics to be literally true - Socrates is often engaged in Homeric hermeneutics.
What are you talking about? Plato most certainly did not believe Homer or Hesiod to be true. In the Republic, he suggests that legends such as Hera being battered by Zeus and Hepaestius intervening and getting cast down are absurd, and goes so far as to say that new myths should be invented for the ideal state. Likewise, we see Socrates questioning traditional piety in Euthrypo, and in Phaedo he argues for reincarnation as oppossed to the Hades of the Odyssey (of course, I tend to view this as more Platonic than Socratic...). Just because Socrates makes mention of (perphaps) talking with Achilles in the afterlife doesn't mean he believed in the Epics.
countjulian is offline  
Old 04-21-2006, 11:14 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 4,876
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by countjulian
What are you talking about? Plato most certainly did not believe Homer or Hesiod to be true. In the Republic, he suggests that legends such as Hera being battered by Zeus and Hepaestius intervening and getting cast down are absurd, and goes so far as to say that new myths should be invented for the ideal state. Likewise, we see Socrates questioning traditional piety in Euthrypo, and in Phaedo he argues for reincarnation as oppossed to the Hades of the Odyssey (of course, I tend to view this as more Platonic than Socratic...). Just because Socrates makes mention of (perphaps) talking with Achilles in the afterlife doesn't mean he believed in the Epics.
It is quite possible to believe in a historical Helen Achilles Hector etc doing more or less what the Iliad has them doing without taking literally Homer's anthropomorphic Gods.

Andrew Criddle
andrewcriddle is offline  
Old 04-21-2006, 07:05 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the torture chambers of Pinochet's Chile
Posts: 2,112
Default

Quote:
It is quite possible to believe in a historical Helen Achilles Hector etc doing more or less what the Iliad has them doing without taking literally Homer's anthropomorphic Gods.
Fully aware, that's what I believe. It's just that the poster I quoted claimed Plato was a true believer of Homer, which is not a statement that could be made by any one familiar with Plato.
countjulian is offline  
Old 04-21-2006, 07:11 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by countjulian
Fully aware, that's what I believe. It's just that the poster I quoted claimed Plato was a true believer of Homer, which is not a statement that could be made by any one familiar with Plato.
Please reread both my statement and Plato. Yes, Socrates did consider Homer to be a real person, and yes he did think the epics really happened. Whether he thought the actions attributed to the gods are poetical invention or history is besides the point.
Chris Weimer is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:37 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.