FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-14-2008, 05:41 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SF Bay
Posts: 7,589
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deep6sleep View Post
I was flabbergasted by this and had never heard that.
I hope you are equally flabbergasted by other biblical passages that describe how to get goats to conceive baby-goats of a certain color by having them look at sticks of the desired color, how to treat snake bites by looking at a metal snake on a pole, how to cure leprosy with bird blood, how diseases are caused by demonic possession, and so on. I am sure you will find the science in these passages to be out of this world too.
sy2502 is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 05:45 PM   #12
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 61,538
Default

I wonder if that quote by Jesus is the reason Europeans didn't wash much.
premjan is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 08:24 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wyncote PA
Posts: 1,524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidbach View Post
This is as nonsensical as the notion that Leviticus is divinely inspired. In all societies until recent times (and still today in some Catholic and Mohammedan societies), there was a dualism between the priestly and secular authorities. In ancient times the "witch doctors" were the repositories of such wisdom and scientific, medical and legal knowledge as was available, and this is no doubt embedded in Leviticus. The secular authorities were far to busy killing and being killed to become educated. Just read Chronicles and Kings - not literally true, but almost certainly representative of the times.

David.
I have no idea where you get your information, but in this case, you are flat out wrong. Whether you believe in God or not,whether you believe the Torah was written by God or a committee, the Torah is a Jewish document and there is no Jewish tradition anywhere that sources the Holiness Code as being for health reasons. In fact it is called the Holiness code for a reason, it's about holiness.
HaRaAYaH is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 08:26 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wyncote PA
Posts: 1,524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Some of the rules of Leviticus might have an incidental effect of keeping the population healthy, and this would have improved the chances of these rules surviving. The same thing has been alleged of Native American rituals which forbid contact with rats, which spread the hantivirus.

But there is a more coherent explanation of the ten commandments here. They are basically an attempt at sympathetic magic.

There is certainly nothing relating to health in forbidding the wearing of clothing made from two different fibers, or forbidding two different crops from being grown in the same field.
There are many explanations of the ten commandments and in fact there are many versions of the ten commandments. But the ten commandments appear twice once in Exodus and once in Deuteronomy, while the Holiness Code appears in Leviticus.
HaRaAYaH is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 07:23 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HaRaAYaH View Post
But the ten commandments appear twice once in Exodus and once in Deuteronomy, while the Holiness Code appears in Leviticus.
What about the Exodus-34 version of the ten commandments?
John Kesler is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 08:37 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wyncote PA
Posts: 1,524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Kesler View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by HaRaAYaH View Post
But the ten commandments appear twice once in Exodus and once in Deuteronomy, while the Holiness Code appears in Leviticus.
What about the Exodus-34 version of the ten commandments?
No Jewish authority recognizes Exodus 34 as the Ten commandments...
HaRaAYaH is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 11:09 AM   #17
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Midwest
Posts: 340
Default

Historically, when did apologists start interpreting the rules of Leviticus as a god mandated means of controling microbes to save the 1-2 million (what I have been told) hebrews on their way to the holy land?
My wife said that god saw the need to intercede because if he didn't, the living conditions and close quarters were ripe for an epidemic. I had never heard of this.
deep6sleep is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 12:22 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wyncote PA
Posts: 1,524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deep6sleep View Post
Historically, when did apologists start interpreting the rules of Leviticus as a god mandated means of controling microbes to save the 1-2 million (what I have been told) hebrews on their way to the holy land?
My wife said that god saw the need to intercede because if he didn't, the living conditions and close quarters were ripe for an epidemic. I had never heard of this.
It's because somebody made it up. Ask her why it's called the Holiness code and not the health code.
HaRaAYaH is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 01:40 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HaRaAYaH View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Kesler View Post

What about the Exodus-34 version of the ten commandments?
No Jewish authority recognizes Exodus 34 as the Ten commandments...
The question, though, is if the text claims that Exodus 34 is a version of the ten commandments.

Quote:
27 Yahweh said to Moses: Write these words; in accordance with these words I have made a covenant with you and with Israel. 28 He was there with Yahweh forty days and forty nights; he neither ate bread nor drank water. And he wrote on the tablets the words of the covenant, the ten commandments.
As the Jewish Study Bible--quoted by me in the link above--acknowledges, "in the immediate context he wrote is most naturally construed as referring to Moses and the terms of the covenant as referring to the terms mentioned in vv. 11-26."
John Kesler is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 02:44 PM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wyncote PA
Posts: 1,524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Kesler View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by HaRaAYaH View Post

No Jewish authority recognizes Exodus 34 as the Ten commandments...
The question, though, is if the text claims that Exodus 34 is a version of the ten commandments.

Quote:
27 Yahweh said to Moses: Write these words; in accordance with these words I have made a covenant with you and with Israel. 28 He was there with Yahweh forty days and forty nights; he neither ate bread nor drank water. And he wrote on the tablets the words of the covenant, the ten commandments.
As the Jewish Study Bible--quoted by me in the link above--acknowledges, "in the immediate context he wrote is most naturally construed as referring to Moses and the terms of the covenant as referring to the terms mentioned in vv. 11-26."
If you read the text, it doesn't say those are the ten commandments. It says the 10 commandments were written on the tablets and there are way more than 10 commandments in that little section.
HaRaAYaH is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:10 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.