FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-15-2006, 08:47 PM   #11
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

My advice is start trying to get some stuff published if you can. Publishing early is something that can get you attention right away and give prosepective hirers something to look at. Being a good writer is one of the most attractive traits you can have when you're trying to land a job.

I definitely think you should pursue this. You're a good researcher, you ask the right questions and you seem to able to keep an open mind and keep your eye on the ball when it comes to academic inquiry.

Alas, the BA in Religious Studies and Classical languages was as far as I ever got. I had plans to get a Masters in Ancient Middle Eastern Religions but kids came along and bogged me down. One day I'll get back into it....sigh...
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 12-15-2006, 09:11 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,396
Default

Good plan, good schools. You'll make a fine scholar, Peter. Best of luck to you.
Apikorus is offline  
Old 12-16-2006, 06:28 AM   #13
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Skeptic
If you get a Ph.D., would you use it to try to get people to accept a worldview of your choice, or does a person's worldview matter to you? In other words, if you get a Ph.D., what would your agenda be?
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterKirby
I laughed at this. Is a Ph.D. a blunt weapon for ideological battles? I never knew. I thought it meant that the person had the ability to teach the subject. Have you ever had a good teacher who saw her/his mission as inculcating a particular 'worldview'? I haven't.
I had assumed that you care what people believe. I guess I was wrong. On the other hand, maybe I was right. If you have children, I assume that you do care what they believe and have influenced them with your views on religion. Do you care whether or not intelligent design is taught in public schools?

You do not believe that Jesus physically or tangibly rose from the dead, right?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 12-16-2006, 06:37 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Mr. Skeptic,

Drop the other one. If I had said, "I would pledge myself and my Ph.D. wholly to the destruction of the dark forces of Christianity," wouldn't you...um...HAVE...to describe me as being unhumanistic in spirit and hopelessly agenda-driven?

I would submit that our best defense against error in all forms is a commitment to excellence in education, not to any particular creed. If a student understood biology well, there would be no need to 'inculcate a worldview of evolutionism' or some such rot.

--
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 12-16-2006, 06:56 AM   #15
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default I wish to become a professor of religion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Kirby
Mr. Skeptic,

Drop the other one. If I had said, "I would pledge myself and my Ph.D. wholly to the destruction of the dark forces of Christianity," wouldn't you...um...HAVE...to describe me as being unhumanistic in spirit and hopelessly agenda-driven?

I would submit that our best defense against error in all forms is a commitment to excellence in education, not to any particular creed. If a student understood biology well, there would be no need to 'inculcate a worldview of evolutionism' or some such rot.
Regarding "excellence in education", don't you intend to use education to encourage people to reject religion?

Please do not misunderstand me. I am well aware that science and education are destroying religion. The destruction of religion by any means is a good thing. One of those means is philosophy. I am a strong supporter of philosophy as a means to destroy Christianity. Millions of people have refused to accept Christianity, or have given up Christianity, for philosophical reasons regarding the nature of God.

Regarding "the dark forces of Christianity" I believe that fundamentalist Christianity is a dark force, and that it is a threat to society. No matter what the religion, fundamentalists are usually trouble.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 12-16-2006, 07:21 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

True religion, we are told in James 1:27, is "to visit orphans and widows in their affliction, and to keep oneself unstained from the world." If someone's religious attitude were based solidly on that verse, would you regard the destruction of that religious attitude as being a good thing, something for which to strive?

--
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 12-16-2006, 07:26 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Kirby View Post
True religion, we are told in James 1:27, is "to visit orphans and widows in their affliction, and to keep oneself unstained from the world." If someone's religious attitude were based solidly on that verse, would you regard the destruction of that religious attitude as being a good thing, something for which to strive?
Oh boy. Come on Peter, that isn't a real definition of religion. :banghead:
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 12-16-2006, 07:33 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the reliquary of Ockham's razor
Posts: 4,035
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachi151 View Post
Oh boy. Come on Peter, that isn't a real definition of religion.
Johnny Skeptic finds it good to destroy religion, without qualification. But cannot a person's religious attitude take the form described?

--
Peter Kirby
Peter Kirby is online now   Edit/Delete Message
Old 12-16-2006, 08:06 AM   #19
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default I wish to become a professor of religion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Kirby
True religion, we are told in James 1:27, is "to visit orphans and widows in their affliction, and to keep oneself unstained from the world." If someone's religious attitude were based solidly on that verse, would you regard the destruction of that religious attitude as being a good thing, something for which to strive?
Your question is ridiculous. Either the Bible is the word of God or it isn't. You believe that it isn't, and you never try to convince anyone that it is.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 12-16-2006, 08:15 AM   #20
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default I wish to become a professor of religion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Kirby
Johnny Skeptic finds it good to destroy religion, without qualification. But cannot a person's religious attitude take the form described?
It is most certainly good to destroy religion in cases where people wrongly interpret it to interfere with the rights of other people. Many bad things that happen in the world are the direct result of religious writings. Surely you are aware that millions of fundamentalist Christians believe that homosexuals will go to hell.

Are you mainly interested in religion in general, or primarily in Christianity? Is your main motive for getting Ph.D. in religion to encourage people to be skeptics, or are you content that people follow various religions? I am still not sure what you are trying to accomplish.

Would you ever consider marrying a Christian? If so, how about a Southern Baptist if one agreed to marry you?
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:48 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.