Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-04-2004, 08:08 PM | #111 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 2,817
|
Quote:
At the time of a proclamation, all the design of a creation -including any consequence of the creation- has to be "...good...". When a consequence of a creation disproves the creation, then the creator designed a no good creation. |
|
01-04-2004, 08:12 PM | #112 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
|
Quote:
And please provide proof that there was no Adam. Science is already tracing the beginnings of humanity to a bottleneck surrounding one woman. |
|
01-04-2004, 08:18 PM | #113 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 2,817
|
Any proof of this, from outside of the religious Bible, Magus55?
Quote:
|
|
01-04-2004, 08:21 PM | #114 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
|
Quote:
Once again for the lurkers, the "bottleneck" to which Magus refers is believed to have occurred 70,000 years ago, and triggered by a massive volcanic eruption which caused worldwide havoc in the ecosystem. IIRC, it was the Yellowstone caldera, in Wyoming. Now Magus, do you still believe that the Sinai is full of sand dunes like the Sahara? If so, it's because you abonded this this thread without reading it completely. Quote:
|
||
01-04-2004, 08:22 PM | #115 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 2,817
|
Quote:
The science doesn't support anyone living hundreds of years. So, Adam's life is unsupported by science. Adam's life is only claimed by religion. Which is not a reference in knowledge. |
|
01-04-2004, 09:53 PM | #116 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 7,204
|
Quote:
|
|
01-04-2004, 10:02 PM | #117 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 2,817
|
Quote:
All fossils of human skeletons are of humans who died in less than 100 years of life. Science never found human life longer than 122 years, and doesn't support it. So, Adam is unsupported by science, too. |
|
01-05-2004, 02:26 AM | #118 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
|
Magus55:
Quote:
You gave a non-answer and then fled when I last confronted you with this very contradiction. According to the Bible, we ARE and ARE NOT responsible for the wrongdoings of our ancestors. On the YES side: Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
01-05-2004, 07:40 AM | #119 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
|
|
01-05-2004, 07:42 AM | #120 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|