![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 707
|
![]()
Thought that the following summary in Nature concerning long necked sea 'monsters' in the Triassic was very interesting.
http://www.nature.com/news/2004/0409...040920-12.html Enjoy! |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 316
|
![]()
I read about this just today, very interesting indeedy! I'm not an expert on dinosaurs or evolution but is it possible this could be an ancestor of snakes, given the way it catches its prey? It even had fangs!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 4,140
|
![]()
What I find interesting is that although this body plan seems to have evolved several times in the past, there seem to be no modern-day equivalents. There are many cases of convergence on similar body plans among unrelated groups, one of the most famous examples being that of sharks, ichthyosaurs, and dolphins.
Then again it's surprising that there were no giant whale-like reptiles in the Mesozoic or reptilian filter feeders of any kind--as far as we know, this kind of lifestyle has only evolved once, in the whale lineage (although the earliest whales were very similar to some of the Mesozoic marine reptiles). |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,440
|
![]()
No, they are quite opposite the snake, with such a rigid neck. It's always been thought that given a long neck, they would strike as a snake does, but the article discusses the unlikelihood of that given the vertebrae structure.
Their speculation on the two possible uses for a long rigid neck are interesting. One, the length of the neck would mean a small increase along the throat equals a huge volume increase, thus the suction to capture prey. The other, in murky water the prey would only see a small head, and not the whole huge creature. In thinking about it, the rigid vacuum cleaner approach would seem to work better, using simple liquid dynamics to aid the creature. While the more "glamorous" flexible neck that strikes the prey wouldn't work well underwater, due to water resistance impeding the movement. So those who sucked more, did better. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vienna, AUSTRIA
Posts: 6,147
|
![]()
Although this is a branching from the original topic: Big filter feeders did evolve twice, among the cartilaginous fishes, who are an ancient branch of the vertebrates: manta rays and giant sharks.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Roanoke, VA, USA
Posts: 2,646
|
![]() Quote:
Filter feeding (not necessarily large animals) is an extremely common form of feeding with examples in practically every animal group! NPM |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 15,407
|
![]()
According to this review,
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,952
|
![]()
Reminds me of the frog fish, although that little ugly bugger would seem to have evolved the suction feeding into an incredibly specialized and efficient mechanism.
Cool stuff ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 4,140
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Billings, Montana
Posts: 451
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|