FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-23-2012, 10:14 PM   #71
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J-D View Post
I think you will find that what sotto voce meant by 'the forced baptisms of Clovis' was not 'baptisms which Clovis was forced to accept' but 'baptisms which Clovis forced other people to accept', although I'm guessing here, because sotto voce has not had the courtesy to provide 'uns own explanation.
For some Christians, explanations are superfluous. You just have to believe what they say, not understand it. As the title of a certain hymn has it, "Trust and Obey."
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 01-24-2012, 04:00 PM   #72
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Shaver View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by J-D View Post
I think you will find that what sotto voce meant by 'the forced baptisms of Clovis' was not 'baptisms which Clovis was forced to accept' but 'baptisms which Clovis forced other people to accept', although I'm guessing here, because sotto voce has not had the courtesy to provide 'uns own explanation.
For some Christians, explanations are superfluous. You just have to believe what they say, not understand it. As the title of a certain hymn has it, "Trust and Obey."
To whom were the original sacraments sworn?

Is this an example of disinformation to be believed?
At the start of the 3rd century Tertullian, in De corona, condemned any Christian soldier's willingness to swear the sacramentum, since baptism was the only sacrament a Christian should observe.
And was Tertullian a real person?
mountainman is offline  
Old 01-24-2012, 05:09 PM   #73
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgreen44 View Post
How did Christianity's understanding of the biography of Jesus cross the Rubicon from..parable to literal history?


1) The Pauline epistles strongly indicate that Paul's Jesus never walked the earth. .
Yes this is the thing

. And its what makes this forum such a valuable place. Here we can be rational about these things, and admit these "strong indications" are real and true and trustworthy.

Like when paul wrote in his letter to the Hesitations that.."This Jesus, who never walked the earth, but only lived on the moon."

book of Hesitations chapter 4 verse 11
judge is offline  
Old 01-24-2012, 05:28 PM   #74
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Shaver View Post
For some Christians, explanations are superfluous. You just have to believe what they say, not understand it. As the title of a certain hymn has it, "Trust and Obey."
To whom were the original sacraments sworn?

Is this an example of disinformation to be believed?
At the start of the 3rd century Tertullian, in De corona, condemned any Christian soldier's willingness to swear the sacramentum, since baptism was the only sacrament a Christian should observe.
And was Tertullian a real person?
Oh, yes, definitely. He lied profusely, a quite reliable indicator of a real person!

Among other notions of his, he couldn't find the concept of sacrament in his Bible. Water baptism is optional. (Why skeptics are so often insistent that it is not is one of life's mysteries.)
sotto voce is offline  
Old 01-25-2012, 03:40 AM   #75
J-D
Moderator - General Religious Discussions
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 27,330
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J-D View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
... allow to me to state my position ...
Please do. Go ahead. What is your position?
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand ... nothing.
J-D is offline  
Old 01-25-2012, 05:44 AM   #76
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug Shaver View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by J-D View Post
I think you will find that what sotto voce meant by 'the forced baptisms of Clovis' was not 'baptisms which Clovis was forced to accept' but 'baptisms which Clovis forced other people to accept', although I'm guessing here, because sotto voce has not had the courtesy to provide 'uns own explanation.
For some Christians, explanations are superfluous. You just have to believe what they say, not understand it. As the title of a certain hymn has it, "Trust and Obey."
To whom were the original sacraments sworn?

Is this an example of disinformation to be believed?
At the start of the 3rd century Tertullian, in De corona, condemned any Christian soldier's willingness to swear the sacramentum, since baptism was the only sacrament a Christian should observe.
And was Tertullian a real person?
Shouldn't you start a new thread if you going to change the subject like this?
Doug Shaver is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:01 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.