Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-23-2006, 02:15 PM | #21 | |||||
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 101
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
04-24-2006, 01:12 PM | #22 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 49
|
Jesse Leigh, please enlighten us!
Since we are so confused and you are ever so smart and your fellow students have figured out the answers to all of our questions, even the one's we haven't asked yet, why don't you please share with us your superior understanding and unlimeted wisdom on these issues. Otherwise, people may think you are just promoting yourself with no intentions of delivering. I think it be wonderful if you could finally clear up the ressurection narrative question for us. (Oh, and please don't off that tired old response that despite the differences and contradictions there is alot in common in the narratives and that proves it must be true. Cause that's what I call the "Everything is so different it's amazing anything is the same at all" line of argument.) Personally, I'd prefer to see Old Testament references to the Trinity, like a reference to the Holy Spirit in the Old Testament. |
04-24-2006, 02:24 PM | #23 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Lara, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 2,780
|
Jesse Leigh.
I think you left a rather large group off your list. That would be those people who accept Christianity but don't believe the Bible is inerrant. There a probably a lot more of them around than people think, and they would not be upset by such a book. They would simply shrug their shoulders and say "so what?" In general I do tend to agree that such a book would not garner a large audience. These days, a market segment needs to be targetted to sell pretty much anything. A book would have to be written with a certain audience in mind, and not stray from that line. Rather difficult to do 20,000+ different brands of Christianity containing such a wide divergance of views, NOT taking into account all the information that is already in the public domain and on the internet Where is the market? Norm |
04-25-2006, 12:49 AM | #24 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In the Coastal Mountains in BC Canada
Posts: 125
|
G'morning!
Memphie: Only GOD can "enlighten" any of us. That isn't within the province of humans. I don't recall saying I am "smart," but do recall thinking the idea of this book is... not so smart. I've never seen one "out there" that can't easily be refuted. That is quite a different matter from "enlightening" someone, however. fromdownunder: Anyone who says *any* Bible in circulation today is "inerrant" clearly hasn't paid very close attention to its contents. The Bible contains many substitutionary words (inserted or withheld by translators) which result in man-made contradictions. Every serious Bible student knows this. My own studies have revealed that the Gospel and the essential components (lessons) in the Bible have been preserved inviolate. You can still find the Truth in *any* Bible, but the words are dead until the Holy Spirit gives Life to them, and that is called "Revelation," and as with "enlightenment," it is only given by God. "God blinds the minds of the unbelievers," meaning, God isn't about to give Divine Revelation to people who come to Him and His Word without reverence and a heartfelt longing for the Truth. However, any who come truly seeking, and in a "childlike" manner, as a child would seek, God has promised to "enlighten." I've never seen this promise fail. Many "search the Scriptures," but because they do so "for the wrong reasons" they are not **permitted** to find the Truth it contains. The Bible declares this, and to those of us who have spent decades observing such people, it is a self-evident truth. Of course, I present my own understanding and experience only in this post. I know most will dismiss it, but perhaps... not everyone. This is why I write. Love - Jesse. |
04-25-2006, 03:34 AM | #25 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
04-25-2006, 03:46 AM | #26 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
|
As for being "not shocked":
Many Biblically-naive Christians would probably be surprised to learn that God ordered genocides, required human sacrifices (including child sacrifices), punished people for the crimes of others, acknowledged the existence of other gods, endorsed flat-Earthism and the belief that the sky was a solid dome with little lights (stars) attached to it, and so forth. You haven't specified whether you're "not shocked" because you accept all this, or whether you're "not shocked" because you're unaware of this, or whether you're "not shocked" because you don't consider the entire Bible to be divinely inspired, or whether you're "not shocked" because you consider parts of the Bible to be "metaphorical", or whether you're "not shocked" because you've chosen to believe the convoluted excuses of Christian apologists. Or some combination of the above. |
04-25-2006, 04:56 AM | #27 | |||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Lara, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 2,780
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Norm |
|||||
04-26-2006, 09:59 AM | #28 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
The preaching and appeals to the supernatural have been split off and sent to Elsewhere.
|
06-06-2006, 01:42 PM | #29 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Appalachia
Posts: 274
|
Has anybody ever printed up any tee-shirts with some of the more bizarre bible verses? They're cheaper than books, and nobody is likely to rip them off your back and throw them at you.
The bestiary might make for some amusement, too. |
06-06-2006, 02:39 PM | #30 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Quote:
But I wouldn't be too sure that no one would rip them off your back. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|