FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-08-2005, 05:35 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 7
Default Question about God

Presuming there is a God, why did he create the human race?
cave dweller is offline  
Old 02-08-2005, 05:38 PM   #2
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 313
Default

Most here would say the human race created God in their image rather than the other way around.
ferrari is offline  
Old 02-08-2005, 05:45 PM   #3
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 5,864
Default

Boredom - the cable went out. Besides, he had to send someone to hell. I mean, it was there.

cave dweller,
since you’re addressing mostly non-believers you’re going to get a lot of wiseass and negative responses.

If any theists respond they’ll probably offer some variation of the highly cogent “mysterious ways�? argument.

And welcome to our little zoo.
Howard is offline  
Old 02-08-2005, 05:50 PM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: A world less bright without WinAce.
Posts: 7,482
Default

Because he's a narcissist and wanted someone to praise him?

Because he was lonely?

I think in Hebrews the question is dealt with. Something about the Angels being not-in-god's-actual-image or somesuch. I'll look it up quick.

Hebrews 1:14
14Are not all angels ministering spirits sent to serve those who will inherit salvation?

So, God was bored, and the angels are just our bitches, not suitable company for him. Or something like that.
Angrillori is offline  
Old 02-08-2005, 06:06 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 7
Default

So is it safe to assume most readers here will hold that Mother Nature created us? We observe that she does not generally create animals that use up hundreds of times the energy they replace merely to subsist. That would be inefficient--and Mother Nature is not inefficient. How could we possibly be a natural result of her processes?
cave dweller is offline  
Old 02-08-2005, 06:08 PM   #6
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,283
Default

Because He needed spare parts to repair Himself so He created humanity knowing that in ten thousand years or so they'd evolve into the spares he was missing, then He'd go and conquer the universe... Oh wait, that was the Xenogears 'God'. You were asking about this universe... Because without Mankind there could be no farmers and without farmers there could be no harvested grain and without harvested grain there could be no Beer. That's as good an answer as any you're likely to get.
Weltall is offline  
Old 02-08-2005, 06:14 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: A world less bright without WinAce.
Posts: 7,482
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cave dweller
So is it safe to assume most readers here will hold that Mother Nature created us? We observe that she does not generally create animals that use up hundreds of times the energy they replace merely to subsist. That would be inefficient--and Mother Nature is not inefficient. How could we possibly be a natural result of her processes?
What exactly are you saying here? Is it your claim that life couldn't evolve to be a tertiary consumer on the food chain?
Angrillori is offline  
Old 02-08-2005, 06:20 PM   #8
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 467
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cave dweller
So is it safe to assume most readers here will hold that Mother Nature created us?
not if you are going to assume that we think of an anthropomorphized concept of natural forces.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cave dweller
We observe that she does not generally create animals that use up hundreds of times the energy they replace merely to subsist.
it is unheard of for grazing mammals to overgraze an area.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cave dweller
That would be inefficient--and Mother Nature is not inefficient. How could we possibly be a natural result of her processes?
tell me exactly how efficient nature is then. tell me exactly how inefficient human beings are. i hope you are being a bit tongue in cheek.
Danhalen is offline  
Old 02-08-2005, 06:29 PM   #9
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: one nation under-educated
Posts: 1,233
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cave dweller
Presuming there is a God, why did he create the human race?
He didnt,
we evolved from lower lifeforms. :wave:
sourdough is offline  
Old 02-08-2005, 06:36 PM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: one nation under-educated
Posts: 1,233
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cave dweller
So is it safe to assume most readers here will hold that Mother Nature created us? We observe that she does not generally create animals that use up hundreds of times the energy they replace merely to subsist. That would be inefficient--and Mother Nature is not inefficient. How could we possibly be a natural result of her processes?
if youre trying this excuse to prove God,then wouldnt this supposedly perfect Creator have done piss poor inefficient job with His creation? :huh:

anyway the simple fact that human race is still here and doing pretty good makes me think we have evolved and adapted to our planets environment just fine. :thumbs:
sourdough is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:39 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.