FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-25-2012, 01:05 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
How does Robert Price reckon that Jeremiah knew about Jesus' birth, and the invention of Mass? Does he believe in divine prophecy?

He doesn't think Jeremiah knew about any future events.
So the comment that 'Price debunks the common idea that Christmas trees are forbidden in the Bible' is incorrect.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 12-25-2012, 01:12 PM   #12
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post

He doesn't think Jeremiah knew about any future events.
So the comment that 'Price debunks the common idea that Christmas trees are forbidden in the Bible' is incorrect.
Please explain how you derived that. Show your work and all intermediate steps.
Toto is offline  
Old 12-25-2012, 01:12 PM   #13
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Valdebernardo
Posts: 73
Default

You may not know that in Spain, a traditionally Catholic country, we had not Xmas trees until recently. My fathers saw them as a foreign, almost heathen tradition, imported from evil countries (Albion and its successors :-)
Gorit Maqueda is offline  
Old 12-25-2012, 01:29 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post

He doesn't think Jeremiah knew about any future events.
So the comment that 'Price debunks the common idea that Christmas trees are forbidden in the Bible' is incorrect.
Please explain how you derived that. Show your work and all intermediate steps.
Jeremiah either referred to 'Christmas' trees, or he didn't. Which?
sotto voce is offline  
Old 12-25-2012, 01:32 PM   #15
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post

Please explain how you derived that. Show your work and all intermediate steps.
Jeremiah either referred to 'Christmas' trees, or he didn't. Which?
Jeremiah did not refer to "Christmas" trees, but he did refer to acts which some self-described Christians interpret as the same as bringing a Christmas tree into the house and decorating it.

These self-described Christians, whom you may label as lascivious virtual pagans or whatever, claim that Jeremiah is the basis for forbidding Christmas trees.

Clear?
Toto is offline  
Old 12-25-2012, 01:59 PM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post

Please explain how you derived that. Show your work and all intermediate steps.
Jeremiah either referred to 'Christmas' trees, or he didn't. Which?
Jeremiah did not refer to "Christmas" trees, but he did refer to acts which some self-described Christians interpret as the same as bringing a Christmas tree into the house and decorating it.
Not 'the common idea', then. In fact, something that could arise 'only in America'. Something crackpot. Something hardly fit for serious discussion in FRDB, surely.

Serious students, if not ordinary readers, immediately recognise Jer 10:2 as concerning idols. It concerns the practice described in Isaiah 41:7 and 44:13-17. How is it that Price is unaware of what every standard commentary indicates?

One must reject his offering as either deep ignorance, or as a desperate attempt to insinuate that, while 'Christmas' trees are not biblical, 'Christmas' is. In other words, Robert M. Price is as much a believer in Jesus as the apostles were.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 12-25-2012, 02:47 PM   #17
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post

Jeremiah did not refer to "Christmas" trees, but he did refer to acts which some self-described Christians interpret as the same as bringing a Christmas tree into the house and decorating it.
Not 'the common idea', then. In fact, something that could arise 'only in America'. Something crackpot. Something hardly fit for serious discussion in FRDB, surely.
Most of our threads involve crackpot notions of some sort, according to somebody.

Quote:
Serious students, if not ordinary readers, immediately recognise Jer 10:2 as concerning idols. It concerns the practice described in Isaiah 41:7 and 44:13-17. How is it that Price is unaware of what every standard commentary indicates?
Guess you didn't listen to the podcast. He is quite aware. But some are not, evidently.

Quote:
One must reject his offering as either deep ignorance, or as a desperate attempt to insinuate that, while 'Christmas' trees are not biblical, 'Christmas' is. In other words, Robert M. Price is as much a believer in Jesus as the apostles were.
Ha ha ha. Merry Christmas, as Dawkins would say.
Toto is offline  
Old 12-25-2012, 02:55 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post

Jeremiah did not refer to "Christmas" trees, but he did refer to acts which some self-described Christians interpret as the same as bringing a Christmas tree into the house and decorating it.
Not 'the common idea', then. In fact, something that could arise 'only in America'. Something crackpot. Something hardly fit for serious discussion in FRDB, surely.
Most of our threads involve crackpot notions of some sort, according to somebody.
But even people here don't regard America's fundies as serious.

Quote:
Serious students, if not ordinary readers, immediately recognise Jer 10:2 as concerning idols. It concerns the practice described in Isaiah 41:7 and 44:13-17. How is it that Price is unaware of what every standard commentary indicates?
Quote:
Guess you didn't listen to the podcast. He is quite aware.
In that case, he's the unwilling, even frightened, believer.

Not the only one, by the look of it.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 12-25-2012, 06:18 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlDoherty View Post
Poor humanity!

Hitchens was right.
His pal Dawkins sings carols at this time of year. Words like these:

'O holy Child of Bethlehem
Descend to us, we pray
Cast out our sin and enter in
Be born in us today'

Quote:
Religion really does poison everything.
For people who say they don't believe in a deity, yet are driven into incoherent babbling by the thought of a world without 'Christmas'?
No, the incoherent babbling comes from NT historicists at the thought of a world without an historical Jesus.

Have you got a link to where Dawkins sings this? And if I were at Disneyland I might join in a singing of a Mickey Mouse theme song. Doesn't mean I believe in Mickey Mouse.

Earl Doherty
EarlDoherty is offline  
Old 12-25-2012, 07:08 PM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlDoherty View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by EarlDoherty View Post
Poor humanity!

Hitchens was right.
His pal Dawkins sings carols at this time of year. Words like these:

'O holy Child of Bethlehem
Descend to us, we pray
Cast out our sin and enter in
Be born in us today'

Quote:
Religion really does poison everything.
For people who say they don't believe in a deity, yet are driven into incoherent babbling by the thought of a world without 'Christmas'?
No, the incoherent babbling comes from NT historicists at the thought of a world without an historical Jesus.
That's another battle, another war.

Quote:
Have you got a link to where Dawkins sings this?
Toto kindly provided a quote. He will do more than that. He will actually recite in public from the Bible, that he claims is not only nonsense, but wicked nonsense! Mind-boggling.

He is certainly on record (a year ago) as saying that he sings carols. Presumably he does not object if someone picks 'O Little Town of Bethlehem', of which I posted an extract.

Quote:
Quote:
And if I were at Disneyland I might join in a singing of a Mickey Mouse theme song. Doesn't mean I believe in Mickey Mouse.
But nobody does. Do they?

Let's be sensible. Will Dawkins admit that he sings The Red Flag with others, in public? I think he'd rather not.
sotto voce is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:55 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.