![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,805
|
![]()
I thought the fundies all agreed that Chernobyl was Wormwood.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: the 10th planet
Posts: 5,065
|
![]()
I think the word Chernobyl means wormwood, but I thought wormwood was supposed to be a comet.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: NZ
Posts: 7,895
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Shadowy Planet
Posts: 7,585
|
![]()
Sedna is not a planet.
Neither is Pluto, for that matter. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: went outside to see what the birds are doing
Posts: 579
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 1,854
|
![]()
another link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3511678.stm
So it seems that Sedna isn't total bunk and may very well exist and even eventually be considered the 10th planet. Of course, it depends on the definition of planet, as was brought up, many don't consider Pluto to be a planet. Ahem, as for the predictions of Sedna hitting the planet Earth as in his "prophetic vision"... well... *cough*bullshit*cough* |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|