FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-27-2008, 06:23 PM   #61
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chili View Post
(I hold here that Peter was declared rock because of his great insight to recognize Jesus as the messiah-to-come).
Perhaps called "rock" because he was inanimate.
. . . very inanimate or faith would not be a gift of God.
Chili is offline  
Old 09-30-2008, 03:01 PM   #62
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DeKalb, Illinois
Posts: 27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by penguinfan View Post

I believe that Paul created the Christianity that is known to us today. Before Paul, I believe that the early Jesus movement were simply reformers of the Law. Jesus taught within the Law, but encouraged forgiveness.
Belief without evidence is called a WILD guess.
The evidence is Jesus' own words.
penguinfan is offline  
Old 09-30-2008, 03:03 PM   #63
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DeKalb, Illinois
Posts: 27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbarntt View Post
Quote:
Was Paul the founder of Christianity?
No, but he sure had a hand in spreading it.

Plainly Peter and James, at least, predate Paul as Christians.

Your question seems silly.
What seems silly about? Have you never heard of Pauline Christianity?
penguinfan is offline  
Old 09-30-2008, 08:08 PM   #64
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by penguinfan View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post

Belief without evidence is called a WILD guess.
The evidence is Jesus' own words.
And who was Jesus?

Anywhere you see the word "Jesus", it is your "Jesus" and that's your evidence. And if you read that Jesus said anything that is the evidence that Jesus is truthful.

You think there was one Jesus and that all he said was the truth.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 10-03-2008, 03:41 AM   #65
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 431
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by penguinfan View Post

The evidence is Jesus' own words.
And who was Jesus?
This question has been asked already:

"But what about you?" he asked. "Who do you say I am?" [Mark 8:29]

It remains pertinent millenia after it was first asked. The answer still matters. Now, just as then, there are umpteen ways to deny that Jesus was the Christ, even for some of those that accompanied Him.

It shows that you don't have to educated or be party to any actual observation of Jesus to believe or reject Him.
Helpmabob is offline  
Old 10-03-2008, 07:08 AM   #66
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Helpmabob View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post

And who was Jesus?
This question has been asked already:

"But what about you?" he asked. "Who do you say I am?" [Mark 8:29]

It remains pertinent millenia after it was first asked. The answer still matters. Now, just as then, there are umpteen ways to deny that Jesus was the Christ, even for some of those that accompanied Him.

It shows that you don't have to educated or be party to any actual observation of Jesus to believe or reject Him.

You have not answered the questions!

Who was Jesus? Did the authors called Paul invent him?

It is true that the Jesus of the NT is implausible, from conception through the Holy Ghost to ascension through the clouds, and that the authors called Paul claimed to have received revelations from the very implausible character.

And further, no early Church writer ever claimed that the authors called Paul were the first to write about the implausible character, Jesus of the NT.

It would seem that the authors called Paul got their information from other written text.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 10-03-2008, 08:28 AM   #67
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
It would seem that the authors called Paul got their information from other written text.
Maybe from Syria?

Now there was a disciple at Damascus named Anani'as. The Lord said to him in a vision, "Anani'as." And he said, "Here I am, Lord."
And the Lord said to him, "Rise and go to the street called Straight, and inquire in the house of Judas for a man of Tarsus named Saul; for behold, he is praying,
and he has seen a man named Anani'as come in and lay his hands on him so that he might regain his sight."
But Anani'as answered, "Lord, I have heard from many about this man, how much evil he has done to thy saints at Jerusalem;
and here he has authority from the chief priests to bind all who call upon thy name."
But the Lord said to him, "Go, for he is a chosen instrument of mine to carry my name before the Gentiles and kings and the sons of Israel;
for I will show him how much he must suffer for the sake of my name."
So Anani'as departed and entered the house. And laying his hands on him he said, "Brother Saul, the Lord Jesus who appeared to you on the road by which you came, has sent me that you may regain your sight and be filled with the Holy Spirit."
And immediately something like scales fell from his eyes and he regained his sight. Then he rose and was baptized,
and took food and was strengthened.
For several days he was with the disciples at Damascus.
Acts 9
bacht is offline  
Old 10-04-2008, 08:27 AM   #68
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Helpmabob View Post
It remains pertinent millenia after it was first asked. The answer still matters.
Not really. What has always mattered is how one gets one's answer. You can take the word of someone who claims to know the answer, or you can examine the evidence without presupposing that any particular answer has to be the right one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Helpmabob View Post
Now, just as then, there are umpteen ways to deny that Jesus was the Christ
Yep. And some of them are really good ways.
Doug Shaver is offline  
Old 10-04-2008, 10:56 PM   #69
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DeKalb, Illinois
Posts: 27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Helpmabob View Post
This question has been asked already:

"But what about you?" he asked. "Who do you say I am?" [Mark 8:29]

It remains pertinent millenia after it was first asked. The answer still matters. Now, just as then, there are umpteen ways to deny that Jesus was the Christ, even for some of those that accompanied Him.

It shows that you don't have to educated or be party to any actual observation of Jesus to believe or reject Him.

You have not answered the questions!

Who was Jesus? Did the authors called Paul invent him?

It is true that the Jesus of the NT is implausible, from conception through the Holy Ghost to ascension through the clouds, and that the authors called Paul claimed to have received revelations from the very implausible character.

And further, no early Church writer ever claimed that the authors called Paul were the first to write about the implausible character, Jesus of the NT.

It would seem that the authors called Paul got their information from other written text.
Lol, if the authors of the Pauline Epistles invented Jesus, then they would not have Jesus' words contradict Paul's teachings, hence the point of this thread.
penguinfan is offline  
Old 10-06-2008, 02:28 AM   #70
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Florida
Posts: 15,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aa5874 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by penguinfan View Post
My question in this thread is whether Paul is the real founder of Christianity or not.
Now, based on the NT, if Saul/Paul was persecuting Christians before he (Saul/Paul) himself became a Christian then it should be obvious that Saul/Paul was NOT the founder of Christianity.

And based on Church History there were many people all over the known world that believed in Jesus Christ long before Saul/Paul was converted to Christ after being blinded by a bright light.

So, Saul/Paul is not the founder of Christianity, and it would appear that his conversion and/or revelations never happened as described. The founder of Christianity cannot be confirmed.
Paul himself does not claim to be the founder of Christianity. He did not found all of the churches that he wrote to, especially the Roman church. Even in Corinth he seems to have been, at best, the co-founder with Apollos. Moreover, some of his letters seem to be quoting hymns that were apparently in common usage. He claims to be a convert so, presumably, he converted to something that was already there.
boneyard bill is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:58 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.