Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
06-01-2007, 11:46 AM | #11 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Posts: 1,504
|
(from the link)
Quote:
|
|
06-01-2007, 11:56 AM | #12 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
|
Hmmm...
Wikipedia dumped an article on Yehuda for lack of academic value. Quote:
|
|
06-01-2007, 12:48 PM | #13 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
Here's are five languages, Greek, Latin, Sanskrit, English and Hebrew: one . | oinos | ek. . | ahad. | unus two . | duo . | dva . | shtaim| duo three | tria. | tri . | shalosh tres father| pathr | pitar | ab. . | pater foot. | pod-. | pad . | regel | ped- head. | kefala| kapala| rosh. | caput hound | kunos | chvan | keleb | canis know. | ginoskw jna . | yada. | conoscere Which of these columns is Hebrew? Languages usually come in families: the longer groups of people with the same language are separated, the more dissimilar their languages become, but one can usually show the relationships between the languages because you can see how the languages have changed, eg a number of words in English or German start with a /h/ which start in Latin and Greek with a /k/ (eg horn, cornus, keras). Relationships in many simple (core langauge) words can be shown amongst Indo-European languages, just as one can amongst Semitic languages, eg Hebrew, Arabic, Babylonian, Akkadian, Ugaritic, and Aramaic. I should hope your source wouldn't want to say that all the Semitic languages come from Greek: they are much more similar to each other than with Greek, while Greek is much more similar to other Indo-European languages than to Hebrew. spin |
|
06-02-2007, 07:18 AM | #14 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 11
|
Spin
Thanks for the explanation/clarification you made about Semitic languages, etc. Toto Thanks for the wikipedia link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikiped...seph_E._Yahuda Regards |
06-03-2007, 02:25 AM | #15 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
|
One can also do comparisons of grammar, especially word morphology, and one can easily recognize the closer families like Germanic, Slavic, etc., as well as some of the larger ones like Indo-European. One can also recognize the Semitic family, which Hebrew and Arabic are in -- and conclude that it is not Indo-European.
And the resemblance becomes stronger the farther back one looks. Vocabulary may not seem like a good way of working out genetic relationships, as they are called, because speakers of many languages are often willing to borrow large amounts of vocabulary from other languages, despite the best efforts of certain linguistic purists. Syntactical patterns may sometimes be borrowed also. But the more basic sort of vocabulary is less often borrowed, and morphology is seldom borrowed. "Latin plurals" of certain words are treated grammatically as irregular English plurals. |
06-03-2007, 02:31 AM | #16 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,283
|
Quote:
Don't joke about that. We had a poster once who insisted that there was Hebrew writing on the Yata no Kagami. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|