FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-03-2009, 02:54 PM   #61
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
I'm not trying to establish that any particular usage of the number 7 is an allegory to the 7 eye visible celestial objects, but instead, am trying to establish the influence of astrotheology on Judaism, which can be done by noting that the holy numbers of Judaism are the same holy numbers repeated in religions worldwide, which originate in the stars.
Without having specific examples, you don't have a case. For example, do the seven churches of Asia in Revelations reflect astrotheology? How about the 7 things God hates (Prov.6)? What about the 7 heads of the Beast?

On all three of these we can safely say no. This is the kind of silly comparisons you open yourself up to when you try and make generalities. If you want to make a case, you need to make a case, not paint with broad strokes and call it overcomplicated to deny connection.

Quote:
Establishing astrotheological influence is step 1.
Let me know when you've done so.

Quote:
We do not understand the line of transmission that results in quantum entanglement. Yet, most of us are willing to conclude a causal relationship based on the observation of the effect itself.
You're going to compare a social science to quantum mechanics? Really?

Quote:
It's true that correlation does not necessitate causality, but that doesn't mean that we can never declare causality without understanding the line of transmission.
It means that you can't declare it too "complex" to deny it. Which is what you've done.

Quote:
If we establish that astrotheology preceded Judaism (which I did in the previous post)
And bravo. Except that nobody was denying it.

Quote:
and we establish that it existed in the same region as Judaism (which I also did in the previous post), that is sufficient to conclude that there probably was influence on Judaism, because the opposite premise - that Judaism was not influenced by pre-existing religions of the region - is a more complex premise.
This is hedging. The claims made have been specific, the claims made by Acharya S. and endorsed by Robert Price even more specific. Even your claims about the number 7, or number 3, were specific. Now we fall back to hedging our bets.

<edit>

Quote:
And it's true that I did not give you a primary source.
<snip for brevity>
And here's where we start running into some confusion. The site you linked actually mentions the Enuma anu Enlil tablets, but notes that they date from the second millenium BCE. The usual date, to my understanding (and contrary to your unsourced conviction), is c.1200-1600 BCE. So your site was dating the collection conventionally, but this particular portion earlier than the rest? Why?

Quote:
I certainly can't read cuniform even if I had access to the tablets. Can you?
Not a word. Doesn't really matter though. I can still understand arguments for dating just fine.

Regards,
Rick Sumner
Rick Sumner is offline  
Old 11-03-2009, 03:06 PM   #62
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Sumner View Post
Without having specific examples, you don't have a case. For example, do the seven churches of Asia in Revelations reflect astrotheology? How about the 7 things God hates (Prov.6)? What about the 7 heads of the Beast?
I flat out disagree. The repetition of certain numbers is enough to conclude that those numbers have a theological meaning. If we see the same numbers showing up in other religions, it's fair to conclude they have a common origin. I don't think common ground is possible on this one, since we seem to have fundamentally different standards.

Quote:
On all three of these we can safely say no.
Applying your own standard, you would have to demonstrate conclusively what each instance of usage of each of these numbers derived from before you could safely say no. Without doing that, you can only safely say "I don't know". This type of inconsistency and false confidence much sillier than anything I've said. I'm at least consistent with my own standard, even if you don't agree with that standard.

Quote:
You're going to compare a social science to quantum mechanics? Really?
I can see I'm wasting my time. The example was not a comparison between quantum mechanics and social science, it was an example of a fairly uncontroversial case where causality is assumed even though no mechanism for it has been identified.
spamandham is offline  
Old 11-03-2009, 03:11 PM   #63
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Sumner View Post
.... For example, do the seven churches of Asia in Revelations reflect astrotheology? How about the 7 things God hates (Prov.6)? What about the 7 heads of the Beast?

On all three of these we can safely say no. ...
Why are you so sure? Do you think that there actually were seven churches?
Toto is offline  
Old 11-03-2009, 03:26 PM   #64
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Why are you so sure? Do you think that there actually were seven churches?
What? Do you know the reference? Revelations 1:11. The seven churches are named. Yes, I think the author had seven churches in mind.
Rick Sumner is offline  
Old 11-03-2009, 03:42 PM   #65
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Sumner View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Why are you so sure? Do you think that there actually were seven churches?
What? Do you know the reference? Revelations 1:11. The seven churches are named. Yes, I think the author had seven churches in mind.
And seven literal lampstands and seven stars in Jesus' hand? Aren't you being overly literal? Were there precisely seven churches in Asia at this time? Is anything in the Book of Revelation meant to be taken literally?
Toto is offline  
Old 11-03-2009, 03:55 PM   #66
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
And seven literal lampstands and seven stars in Jesus' hand? Aren't you being overly literal? Were there precisely seven churches in Asia at this time? Is anything in the Book of Revelation meant to be taken literally?
*sigh* Why are there 7 stars Toto? Why are there seven lampstands? Why don't we start by checking Rev.1.20.

Quote:
SEVEN CHURCHES [Gk hai hepta ekklēsiai (αἱ ἑπτα ἑκκλησιαι)]. The seven churches are those in seven cities of the Roman province of proconsular Asia on the west central coast of Asia Minor. They are the addressees of Revelation (1:4, 11, 20), and individual letters are addressed to each of them in Revelation 2–3. The use of the article indicates that the seven churches were a recognized group: Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira, Sardis, Philadelphia, and Laodicea.

The question arises, “Why does the author only write to seven churches when there were others in the province of Asia?” These other churches include Troas (Acts 20:5–12; 2 Cor 2:12), Colossae (Col 1:2; 2:1), and Hierapolis (Col 4:13). Ignatius addressed letters to Magnesia (Magn.) and Tralles (Trall.) less than two decades later. More fanciful explanations are that these seven churches are symbolic of the types of churches to be found during the church age, or of seven sequential periods of church history. A more accepted explanation takes into account that seven is a number of completeness. The seven churches are representative or heads of all the churches in the region with which the author is familiar and expects his letter to reach, or are representative of the Church at large.

The explanation of William Ramsay (1904:171–96) has received wide support. He proposed that these church cities were selected because, in their given order, they are the postal and judicial districts which a courier from Patmos would encounter and from which his letter could be distributed most effectively throughout the province of Asia.

David Noel Freedman (ed), The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (New York: Doubleday, 1996, c1992), 5:1143.
The simplest explanation for the seven churches is that it was really written with seven churches in mind.
Rick Sumner is offline  
Old 11-03-2009, 04:28 PM   #67
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Sumner View Post
The simplest explanation for the seven churches is that it was really written with seven churches in mind.
No. This is not the simplest explanation. It's a silly explanation. Revelation is so obviously symbolic it's absurd to even suggest the intent is literal.
spamandham is offline  
Old 11-03-2009, 05:16 PM   #68
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mornington Peninsula
Posts: 1,306
Talking seven

Did someone mention seven?
youngalexander is offline  
Old 11-03-2009, 09:43 PM   #69
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: England
Posts: 2,527
Default

Which came first - the use of the number 12 for symbolic or simply numerical purposes - or the zodiac? Does it really matter?

And as for the Robert Price and Acharya S/D Murdock modern interest in numerology and astrothelogy - perhaps its time that this element within the New Testament is finally brought to the light of day and seen for what it is: A continuation of a centuries old fascination with numbers and astronomy. Christians, if they want to continue with their idea that they stand in some special place in all of this - i.e. that their religion is somehow above it all - are surely being shortsighted.

For what its worth here is Josephus on the number 12 - in connection with the Jerusalem temple.

"Now the seven lamps signified the seven planets; for so many there were springing out of the candlestick. Now the twelve loaves that were upon the table signified the circle of the zodiac and the year;" War 5.5.

The connection between these 12 loaves and the 12 tribes of Israel is usually considered to be relevant. Ex.24:4 and 28:9-10.
maryhelena is offline  
Old 11-04-2009, 07:23 AM   #70
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,579
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maryhelena View Post
And as for the Robert Price and Acharya S/D Murdock modern interest in numerology and astrothelogy - perhaps its time that this element within the New Testament is finally brought to the light of day and seen for what it is: A continuation of a centuries old fascination with numbers and astronomy. Christians, if they want to continue with their idea that they stand in some special place in all of this - i.e. that their religion is somehow above it all - are surely being shortsighted.
It's not a question of whether Christians stand "above" numerology and astrotheology. It's more about fascination with nonsense and the uncanny faculty of nonsense to displace knowledge and common sense. People tend to forget that the idiocies of Aryan race and the swastika did not start with Chamberlain or Gobineau or Hitler. The three were just imbibing, each according their ability, and each on a different stage of the spread of the disease, the science of theosophy of Mme Blavatsky.

Jiri
Solo is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:46 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.