Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
09-27-2010, 04:47 PM | #21 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bli Bli
Posts: 3,135
|
|
09-28-2010, 04:26 AM | #22 | |
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Southern England
Posts: 4
|
Quote:
|
|
09-28-2010, 06:25 AM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 758
|
Boxer:
This thread presumes that the Book Of Exodus is not standing alone sufficient evidence of the existence of Moses. Otherwise the question is a foolish one, Exodus clearly states Moses existed so he did. It then becomes a mere question of dating. On the other hand if the tale recounted in Exodus is substantially true there ought to be a massive amount of archeological evidence of the presence of a large number of Hebrews in a rather small area over a long period of time. That evidence has been sought in vain. It is therefore appropriate to conclude tentatively and pending further discoveries that the Exodus as described in the Bible didn’t happen. I think this would be the conclusion of anyone who does not privilege Bible stories over other kinds of evidence. Steve |
09-28-2010, 06:45 AM | #24 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Bernardino, Calif.
Posts: 5,435
|
|
09-28-2010, 06:51 AM | #25 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dancing
Posts: 9,940
|
Quote:
|
|
09-28-2010, 07:06 AM | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 758
|
Mercy:
Yes, we agree, which means we must both be right. Steve |
09-28-2010, 07:58 AM | #27 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
|
Quote:
spin |
|
09-28-2010, 08:54 AM | #28 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: North West usa
Posts: 10,245
|
Quote:
The problem with the Exodus tale is that it makes many exotic claims upon history and events. None of these events can be validated outside of the Bible, and many of them seem to contradict the very real evidence from Egyptian archeology. Sure the Tanakh gets a few people and places named out of history, but that is about it. Obviously, one cannot really prove something didn't happen in history. However, just because some idea is sacred to faith system, doesn't make it any more real. There is lots of internal evidence that suggests that the books now in the Tanakh were edited well beyond the time the events purportedly happened. The oldest copies we have of the books of the Tanakh, are from 200 BCE. The Exodus events purported occurred somewhere between 1200-1500 BC. So our copies are from a millennia after the events. All of this suggests that the historicity of the Book of Exodus does not have a very high level of credibility. One is free to believe it based upon faith, but the facts do not make it very plausible. Yes, there might have been a man providing a kernel that this story sprung off of, just as Jason probably existed. But what constructs beyond a man's mere existence contains any truth in history is a wide open question. |
||
09-28-2010, 10:55 AM | #29 | ||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 3,551
|
I was doing a little research related to the Why the Jews thread in World History. I just posted on there that the Jews and Chaldeans were banished from Rome in 139 BCE. The question is what could you possibly do to annoy the Romans that much?
The answer is astrology and magic. In the middle ages, the few Jewish Scientists (who were also always Rabbis) were usually astronomers and astrologers. My Rabbi, who is Chabad (Haredi) told me that astrology was a legitmate science... this from a guy who believes there was a Tower of Babel. It turns out that Abraham was a Chaldean. As the Jewish Encyclopedia goes: Quote:
Quote:
Moses, etc plays into this also. Biblical Insights into Astrology goes: Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
09-28-2010, 11:57 AM | #30 |
Moderator -
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
|
That's all very imaginative and entertaining, but none of it has the slightest empirical support. All the available historical and archaeological evidence shows both Abraham (and the rest of the Patriarchs) and Moses to be wholly mythological characters.
Moses was probably dimly inspired by the Pharaoh Ahmose I (and his expulsion of the Hyksos which was a likely source for the Exodus myth) who lived in the 16th Century BCE -- long before any such thing as the Hebrews or an Israelite Yahweh cult existed yet. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|