![]()  | 
	
		Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#21 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jan 2003 
				Location: Bli Bli 
				
				
					Posts: 3,135
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#22 | |
| 
			
			 New Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2010 
				Location: Southern England 
				
				
					Posts: 4
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#23 | 
| 
			
			 Senior Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Nov 2004 
				Location: Dallas Texas 
				
				
					Posts: 758
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Boxer: 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	This thread presumes that the Book Of Exodus is not standing alone sufficient evidence of the existence of Moses. Otherwise the question is a foolish one, Exodus clearly states Moses existed so he did. It then becomes a mere question of dating. On the other hand if the tale recounted in Exodus is substantially true there ought to be a massive amount of archeological evidence of the presence of a large number of Hebrews in a rather small area over a long period of time. That evidence has been sought in vain. It is therefore appropriate to conclude tentatively and pending further discoveries that the Exodus as described in the Bible didn’t happen. I think this would be the conclusion of anyone who does not privilege Bible stories over other kinds of evidence. Steve  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#24 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2005 
				Location: San Bernardino, Calif. 
				
				
					Posts: 5,435
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#25 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jul 2004 
				Location: Dancing 
				
				
					Posts: 9,940
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#26 | 
| 
			
			 Senior Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Nov 2004 
				Location: Dallas Texas 
				
				
					Posts: 758
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Mercy: 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Yes, we agree, which means we must both be right. Steve  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#27 | |
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2002 
				Location: nowhere 
				
				
					Posts: 15,747
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	spin  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#28 | ||
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Mar 2004 
				Location: North West usa 
				
				
					Posts: 10,245
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 The problem with the Exodus tale is that it makes many exotic claims upon history and events. None of these events can be validated outside of the Bible, and many of them seem to contradict the very real evidence from Egyptian archeology. Sure the Tanakh gets a few people and places named out of history, but that is about it. Obviously, one cannot really prove something didn't happen in history. However, just because some idea is sacred to faith system, doesn't make it any more real. There is lots of internal evidence that suggests that the books now in the Tanakh were edited well beyond the time the events purportedly happened. The oldest copies we have of the books of the Tanakh, are from 200 BCE. The Exodus events purported occurred somewhere between 1200-1500 BC. So our copies are from a millennia after the events. All of this suggests that the historicity of the Book of Exodus does not have a very high level of credibility. One is free to believe it based upon faith, but the facts do not make it very plausible. Yes, there might have been a man providing a kernel that this story sprung off of, just as Jason probably existed. But what constructs beyond a man's mere existence contains any truth in history is a wide open question.  | 
||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#29 | ||||
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Dec 2008 
				Location: Hillsborough, NJ 
				
				
					Posts: 3,551
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I was doing a little research related to the Why the Jews thread in World History.  I just posted on there that the Jews and Chaldeans were banished from Rome in 139 BCE.  The question is what could you possibly do to annoy the Romans that much? 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	The answer is astrology and magic. In the middle ages, the few Jewish Scientists (who were also always Rabbis) were usually astronomers and astrologers. My Rabbi, who is Chabad (Haredi) told me that astrology was a legitmate science... this from a guy who believes there was a Tower of Babel. It turns out that Abraham was a Chaldean. As the Jewish Encyclopedia goes: Quote: 
	
  Chaldea, Quote: 
	
 Moses, etc plays into this also. Biblical Insights into Astrology goes: Quote: 
	
 Quote: 
	
  | 
||||
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#30 | 
| 
			
			 Moderator - 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2004 
				Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota 
				
				
					Posts: 4,639
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			That's all very imaginative and entertaining, but none of it has the slightest empirical support. All the available historical and archaeological evidence shows both Abraham (and the rest of the Patriarchs) and Moses to be wholly mythological characters. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Moses was probably dimly inspired by the Pharaoh Ahmose I (and his expulsion of the Hyksos which was a likely source for the Exodus myth) who lived in the 16th Century BCE -- long before any such thing as the Hebrews or an Israelite Yahweh cult existed yet.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
		
  |