Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
12-22-2012, 10:19 PM | #1171 | ||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
12-22-2012, 10:39 PM | #1172 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
Quote:
|
|
12-22-2012, 10:51 PM | #1173 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
I'll try again;
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
12-23-2012, 06:53 AM | #1174 | |||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
Justin Martyr did NOT even claim he was a Bishop or President of any Church between c 100-150 CE. It is claimed Ignatius was a Bishop of the Church c 98-117 CE. He would have been the foremost spokesperson for his Church at that time. Marcion was the Leader of a Christian cult c 100-150 CE--Marcion would have been the foremost spokesperson for his Church. Justin Martyr was a LAUGHING STOCK in the time of Marcion and wrote his Apology on behalf of Those of All Nations who were unjustly hated and abused. |
|||
12-23-2012, 07:49 AM | #1175 | |||||||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
How did you arrive at such a time period?? Where is the actual evidence?? Surely, you have heard about the Donation of Constantine. Writings that were claimed to be from the 4th century about Constantine were composed hundreds of years later. The same thing may be about the History of the Church. Eusebius may have written NOTHING at all in the 4th century. Quote:
Joseph Wheless failed to point out and provide actual evidence of any forgeries in the writings attributed to Justin. He seems to think that erroneous information is forgery. Quote:
It is claimed that the writings of Josephus and Tacitus were interpolated and no-one blames them for the forgeries. The writings of Justin Martyr contradict the History of the Church and was NOT used by the Church. We know EXACTLY whose writings are Massive Forgeries--they ALWAYS mention Paul. Quote:
There is evidence of the Jesus story and cult in the 2nd century. If you refuse to accept the evidence then your argument will continue to be futile. |
|||||||
12-23-2012, 09:12 AM | #1176 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
|
AA, cut it out....."recovered NT manuscripts dated to the 2nd century" my foot.........what Christians in Palestine? Where? Which towns? Which locations? Which people? Where? On and on this goes ad nauseum.
The fact is that there is no evidence of any Christian communities anywhere in the second century. And your old pal Justin never ONCE even mentions the locations, cities, leaders, predecessors, colleagues, history of his alleged sect. This is because it did NOT EXIST before the fourth century, which is when it began to emerge, and the fabricator of "Justin" was honest enough not to try to invent all of this in his doctrinal/didactic work. |
12-23-2012, 09:39 AM | #1177 | |||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
Quote:
Who was the Christian church's most prolific KNOWN WRITER of Christian doctrine and apologetics BEFORE c. 150 CE. aa? Can't very well be anyone from whom we do not have a single KNOWN WRITING. Quote:
And do you really wish to claim that the WRITINGS of 'Ignatius' are authentically pre-117 CE? _You get to have ST. Ignatus's testimonony to a 1st century CE. Apostle Paul along with that package. Do you have your own religion where this most prolific early Christian writer's name must be kept a closely guarded and mysterious secret? |
|||||
12-23-2012, 10:04 AM | #1178 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: On the path of knowledge
Posts: 8,889
|
Quote:
WHERE is there any early text that ever says; "Justin Martyr was a LAUGHING STOCK" ? We need DATED DOCUMENTATION of this imaginative claim. You know. We don't accept peoples imaginations here any more. |
|
12-23-2012, 10:17 AM | #1179 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
|
Not to mention the fact that absolutely nothing alleged to have been written by Marcion has ever survived, and has not even been described in passing by the esteemed Justin who supposedly lived at the same time and in the same town as Marcion.
One day historical scholarship is going to have to come to grips with their tendency to build sandcastles based on their reliance on the claims of the commissioned heresiologists and apologists. After all, isn't it simply ridiculous that some guy named Irenaeus (about whom almost nothing is even known) writes a book called "Against Heresies" allegedly in an age (2nd century) when there was no official church to condemn heresies for a population of believers amounting to a relative handful of people that no one knew about?! If Justin and Irenaeus were writers in the 2nd century then my name is Quick Draw McGraw. Quote:
|
||
12-23-2012, 02:56 PM | #1180 | |||
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
|
Quote:
Quote:
You have NO idea that Christians like Marcion and the Marcionites used to LAUGH at Justin and those who believed Jesus was born. First Apology LVIII Quote:
Marion ALONE knew the Truth according to the Marcionites so tell me who was the foremost spokesperson for the CHURCH c 100-150 CE??? Basilides, Valentinus, Marcos, Saturnilus, Ignatius, Aristides???? |
|||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|