FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Philosophy & Religious Studies > Moral Foundations & Principles
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-11-2005, 01:31 AM   #211
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 2,817
Default



I'm going to regret asking this but: What left field did that come flying in from?
Avatar is offline  
Old 04-11-2005, 02:00 AM   #212
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Proxima Centauri
Posts: 467
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Avatar


I'm going to regret asking this but: What left field did that come flying in from?
Hey, Christians get baptized, Jews get the dick thingy. All for the glory of God...
Awmte is offline  
Old 04-11-2005, 10:49 PM   #213
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert Cipriani
Asimis, do John a favor by not answering him. You feed an anti-intellectual monster by playing the "show me where in the Bible" game. Rather, the question should be, why do you have such a strange epistemology?
I'm not sure I understand. If individuals base their moral philosophy on the bible, shouldnt they be prepared to show the specific passages which justify those principles?
John A. Broussard is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 07:53 AM   #214
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,018
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by John A. Broussard
If individuals base their moral philosophy on the bible, shouldnt they be prepared to show the specific passages which justify those principles?
Point is, it is metaphysically and rationally impossible to base morality upon a book. Words upon a page are symbols and symbols beg to be interpreted authoritatively.

If our deistic constitution and even our worthless business contracts necessitate courts of law for interpretation, how much more does the bible written over many centuries in various languages. Ergo, to the degree the bible is a moral guide, it must have an authentic authoritative interpreter, i.e., the Catholic Church. To pretend, as Protestants do, that it is all quite self-evident is an exercise in insanity.

Just the same, every single doctrine of the Catholic Church (there's gotta be over 1,000 of the little buggers!) is based upon scripture. But I won't go there, will not explicate the scriptural basis of any one of them to someone who's epistemology is based upon sola scriptura, for that would be feeding a monsterous error. -- Sincerely, Albert Cipriani the Traditional Catholic
Albert Cipriani is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 08:10 AM   #215
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert Cipriani
Point is, it is metaphysically and rationally impossible to base morality upon a book.
We are in complete agreement. The bible can't possibly be a sound basis for morality.
John A. Broussard is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 11:32 AM   #216
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,018
Thumbs up

Quote:
Albert: “Point is, it is metaphysically and rationally impossible to base morality upon a book.�
John: “We are in complete agreement. The bible can't possibly be a sound basis for morality.�
Cool. What is the basis for your morality?

In 25-words or less, the basis of my morality is rationality which culminates in theism, redacts to Catholicism, that informs my first principals (values) and authoritatively fills in the blanks of my rationality. – Cheers, Albert Cipriani the Traditional Catholic
http://www.geocities.com/albert_cipriani/index.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/religiousphilosophy/
Albert Cipriani is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 12:00 PM   #217
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert Cipriani

In 25-words or less, the basis of my morality is rationality which culminates in theism, redacts to Catholicism, that informs my first principals (values) and authoritatively fills in the blanks of my rationality.
Thank you. There is still the minor problem that others, also basing their morality upon rationality, arrive at conclusions very different from yours. But that's what makes human beings interesting.
John A. Broussard is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 12:35 PM   #218
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,018
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by John A. Broussard
There is still the minor problem that others, also basing their morality upon rationality, arrive at conclusions very different from yours.
That’s not a moral problem. That’s a processing problem that leads to being mistaken, not morally deficient. Just like how, being distracted, one might miss one’s mouth with a drink and have it dribble down one’s shirt. That doesn’t constitute having a drinking problem. If there is a moral God, He will not punish such. Likewise, if we are moral, we ought not to punish those who are morally depraved, only protect ourselves and themselves from their immorality.

Are you hinting at the relativistic non-argument that different moral conclusions means that there are different equally valid moralities? If so, do you believe that when lost in the dark forest, all roads lead home?

Quote:
“But that's what makes human beings interesting.�
Nah. The differing moral values of humans are what reveal us as fallen creatures, not interesting creatures. I can think of a lot more interesting ways to reveal myself as a human being than to have my heart ripped out by an Aztec priest because of some bogus demonically-informed morality. – Sincerely, Albert Cipriani the Traditional Catholic
Albert Cipriani is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 01:06 PM   #219
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert Cipriani
The differing moral values of humans are what reveal us as fallen creatures, not interesting creatures. I can think of a lot more interesting ways to reveal myself as a human being than to have my heart ripped out by an Aztec priest because of some bogus demonically-informed morality. –
Right on. I feel pretty much the way you do about those Aztec priests. I'm even more upset by the morality expressed in the Catholic Inquisition. I'm not sure I'd call either the Aztec or the Catholic priests fallen, but they were certainly interesting.
John A. Broussard is offline  
Old 04-12-2005, 06:38 PM   #220
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,018
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally Posted by John A. Broussard
I'm even more upset by the morality expressed in the Catholic Inquisition.
Why? Do you not know that the Inquisition, as it’s name denotes, was all about questioning, not about torturing? To the degree that it was about torturing and executing, do you not know that the Protestants did more of it than the Catholics and extra-judicially, i.e., without questioning its victim’s dogmas? Why do you think Protestants abandoned England to found this country and then found the time, once here, to conduct the Salem witch hunt? Yet you single out the Catholic Inquisition to be morally upset over. Could you be a victim of Protestant propaganda or worse yet, Saturday Night Live tv skits?

Quote:
“I'm not sure I'd call either the Aztec or the Catholic priests fallen, but they were certainly interesting.�
Then you have a skewed view of interesting. I don’t consider ugly or immoral incidents interesting. Only innocuous incidents that shed some light on reality seem interesting to me. – Sincerely, Albert Cipriani the Traditional Catholic

P.S. Still no answer to what's the basis of your morality?
Albert Cipriani is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:46 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.