FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-29-2012, 09:29 PM   #171
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Logical View Post
First of all, WHY do you CAPITALIZE words RANDOMLY and change font colors all the time? I personally appreciate your knowledge in this subject and your point of view. But you need to calm down...
You need to be factual. Why can't your post reflect what I write?? If you want to make accusations you should at least be correct.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Logical
...Secondly, the mythicists are the ones claiming that Jesus was first claimed to be a celestial being by Paul, and then an physical man by the gospel writers. The claim then is that the idea that Jesus was born and lived in a real point in time in a real place on Earth, which is what I meant by historicizing Jesus....
No, No, No!!! You don't know what you are talking about. You don't know the difference between Doherty's claim and the meaning of the term "Myth Jesus".

Myth Jesus simply means there was NEVER any real Jesus.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Logical
....And so the question was: Why did Jesus the celestial being become Jesus the historical man in early Christianity?
Again, you are arguing against Doherty. You don't even seem to understand that.

Now, you very well know that the authors of the Gospels did NOT claim that Jesus had a human father and described him as the Son of a Ghost and God the Creator.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Logical
I take it you think the gospel writers never claimed to write history, but a parable? The gospels don't read like a myth or parable in certain spots at least, when they use language like, "In the days of King so and so in the city of so and so..." That reads like alleged history to me.
Well, Jesus was FATHERED by a Ghost in the days of King so and so in the city of so and so..... If that reads like history to you then Jesus was really the Son of a Ghost.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 05-29-2012, 09:46 PM   #172
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Logical View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post


cultural anthropology


through education, putting myself in first century Galilee imagining daily life of a traveling teacher/healer.
Is that really enough to establish Jesus' historicity? I mean what would you say the odds are that Jesus existed? 60% or 90%?

You would concede that we're more sure George Washington existed. You wouldn't place Jesus in the same category of certainty, would you? Would Jesus be in the same category with Socrates in terms of certainty?

Nope its not enough, your correct.

thats just what helped push me out of the mj camp



nope GW has complete historicity.



its not a open and shut case, but the weak evidence of the jm camp, that is all over the board with faith. For me doesnt equal teh evidence we are left with.



Can you see a roman worshipping a jewish poverty stricken peasant who travels around healing for dinner scraps, avoids taxes and preaches to tax collectors to quit raping people? a man who travels with a few fishermen who in that time had status below a peasant? a man who had died a miserable death on a cross?
outhouse is offline  
Old 05-29-2012, 09:54 PM   #173
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Auburn ca
Posts: 4,269
Default

Quote:
The message he claims to bring is already known.
so is all the myther garbage.


But, my stance is not following any one scholar, and my view is semi original for claiming a heavy zealot influences, jesus knew from his upbringing in galilee and the tax war while he was a child, that going against romans with violence was suicide, he developed peaceful means of tax evasion, less the temple incident.




Your no authority or have some supreme knowledge to cluck so loud.
outhouse is offline  
Old 05-29-2012, 10:29 PM   #174
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Consider the following list. These are the historians and writers
who DID live within Christ's alleged lifetime or within a hundred
years of it, after the time:

N/A
I would have looked somewhere more trustworthy than where this came from. There are spelling mistakes; one source was repeated as two separate people (Dio Chrysostom, Dion Pruseus); the only famous Lysias lived centuries before; Appian, Arrian and Lucian were all writing over 100 years after the reputed date of Jesus' death, as is the case if the Ptolemy is Claudius; we only know about Justus because Josephus mentions him; we don't know which Petronius it is who wrote the Satyricon, so we don't know when he wrote and we only have his satyre which would need a reason to mention Jesus; if Apollonius is the one from Tyana we have no writings by him; there is no reason to consider that Quintilian, Seneca, Epictetus, Lucan should write about Jesus given their spheres of interest; Silius Italicus's only surviving work regards the 2nd Punic War; Quintus Curtius Rufus's only surviving work was on Alexander; Pomponius Mela wrote a geography book; scholars are not sure if Damis existed; Phlegon of Tralles was writing after 137CE; Columella wrote about agriculture; Theon of Smyrna wrote about mathematics; very few fragments of Favorinus survive so we can't say what he exactly wrote about; Florus wrote a history that stopped in 25BCE; Velleius Paterculus died in 31CE; Phaedrus left us a book of fables; Valerius Flaccus wrote an Argonautica; Pausanias wrote a description of Greece after 150CE; Aulus Gellius was born in 125CE; and I don't know who Hermogones might be.

The list is well, umm, underwhelming. Hopefully, it'll be put out to pasture now.
spin is offline  
Old 05-29-2012, 10:34 PM   #175
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
Quote:
The message he claims to bring is already known.
so is all the myther garbage.
So you're another self-appointed myther basher. There are already enough of them. Can you whistle or play the spoons?

Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
But, my stance is not following any one scholar, and my view is semi original for claiming a heavy zealot influences, jesus knew from his upbringing in galilee and the tax war while he was a child, that going against romans with violence was suicide, he developed peaceful means of tax evasion, less the temple incident.
This is basically eisegesis.

Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
Your no authority or have some supreme knowledge to cluck so loud.
You mightn't have noticed, as you have been so busy asserting authority, but I don't claim to be an authority myself. I however would like you and everyone else who doesn't to start becoming more rational and helpful by citing sources for your claims and citing them reasonably clearly.
spin is offline  
Old 05-29-2012, 10:55 PM   #176
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Logical View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman View Post
The same mystery surrounds Muhammad and the city of Mecca, neither of which appears to have existed (in the ancient historical sources) until a century after the purported events.
That is weird. Muhammad wasn't much of a superman either. He basically led an empire as it rose in Arabia, an impressive but not magical feat. Why invent Muhammad? Islam isn't even centered around him like Christianity is around Jesus. Muhammad is almost not essential.

The canonical books are essential to Christianity, as is the Quran to Islam. Both centralised monotheistic state religious regimes were formed on the wings of war, and relied on the eventual canonization of "Holy Writs". War was a racket.
mountainman is offline  
Old 05-29-2012, 11:08 PM   #177
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
Falling over presuppositions is naturally par for the course. Paul
  1. never met Jesus,
  2. says that his Jesus gospel came from a revelation (Gal 1:12),
  3. tells us that it doesn't come from other people (Gal 1:11), and
  4. doesn't give any indications that the people before him believed in, or knew, Jesus
We don't know what any other messianists of the time believed.

I would love outhouse to learn how to provide tangible evidence.
When was Paul's time and please name the Messianists of that time if you are NOT presupposing.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 05-30-2012, 01:18 AM   #178
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
I would have looked somewhere more trustworthy than where this came from. There are spelling mistakes; one source was repeated as two separate people (Dio Chrysostom, Dion Pruseus); the only famous Lysias lived centuries before; Appian, Arrian and Lucian were all writing over 100 years after the reputed date of Jesus' death, as is the case if the Ptolemy is Claudius; we only know about Justus because Josephus mentions him; we don't know which Petronius it is who wrote the Satyricon, so we don't know when he wrote and we only have his satyre which would need a reason to mention Jesus; if Apollonius is the one from Tyana we have no writings by him; there is no reason to consider that Quintilian, Seneca, Epictetus, Lucan should write about Jesus given their spheres of interest; Silius Italicus's only surviving work regards the 2nd Punic War; Quintus Curtius Rufus's only surviving work was on Alexander; Pomponius Mela wrote a geography book; scholars are not sure if Damis existed; Phlegon of Tralles was writing after 137CE; Columella wrote about agriculture; Theon of Smyrna wrote about mathematics; very few fragments of Favorinus survive so we can't say what he exactly wrote about; Florus wrote a history that stopped in 25BCE; Velleius Paterculus died in 31CE; Phaedrus left us a book of fables; Valerius Flaccus wrote an Argonautica; Pausanias wrote a description of Greece after 150CE; Aulus Gellius was born in 125CE; and I don't know who Hermogones might be.

The list is well, umm, underwhelming. Hopefully, it'll be put out to pasture now.
Gday all,

For those who haven't seen it, here is my breakdown of writers who woulda, coulda, shoulda mentioned Jesus :

WRITERS WHO SHOULD HAVE MENTIONED JESUS

PHILO

Philo Judaeus wrote very many books about Jewish religion and history, in the 30s and 40s, living in Alexandria, and visiting Jerusalem.

Philo was contemporary with Jesus and Paul,
Philo visited Jerusalem and had family there,
he developed the concept of the Logos and the holy spirit,
he was considered a Christian by some later Christians,
he wrote a great deal about related times and peoples and issues.

If Jesus had existed, Philo would almost certainly have written about him and his teachings.

Rating: SHOULD have mentioned Jesus or his teachings, but did not.
Weight: 5



WRITERS WHO PROBABLY SHOULD HAVE MENTIONED JESUS

SENECA

Lucius Annaeus Seneca wrote many philosophic (Stoic) and satirical books and letters (and Tragedies) in Rome.

Seneca wrote a great deal on many subjects and mentioned many people. He was a Stoic, a school of thought considered sympathetic to Christian teachings.

In fact,
early Christians seemed to have expected him to discuss Christianity - they FORGED letters between him and Paul.

How else to explain these forgeries, except as Christian responses to a surprising VOID in Seneca's writings?

Rating: PROBABLY SHOULD have mentioned Jesus or his teachings, but did not.
Weight: 4


PLUTARCH

Plutarch of Chaeronea wrote many works on history and philosophy in Rome and Boetia in about 90-120 CE.

Plutarch wrote about influential Roman figures, including some contemporary to Jesus,
Plutarch wrote on Oracles (prophesies),
Plutarch wrote on moral issues,
Plutarch wrote on spiritual and religious issues.

If Plutarch knew of Jesus or the Gospel events, it is highly likely he would have mentioned them.

Rating: PROBABLY SHOULD have mentioned Jesus or his teachings, but did not.
Weight: 4


JUSTUS

Justus of Tiberias wrote a History of Jewish Kings in Galilee in late 1st century.

Photius read Justus in the 8th century and noted that he did not mention anything: "He (Justus of Tiberias) makes not one mention of Jesus, of what happened to him, or of the wonderful works that he did."

It is surprising that a contemporary writer from the very region of Jesus' alleged acts did not mention him.

Rating: PROBABLY SHOULD have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 3



WRITERS WHO COULD HAVE MENTIONED JESUS


DAMIS

Damis wrote most of what we know about Apollonius of Tyana. He was a philospher and mystic exactly contemporary with Jesus and who was rather similar to Jesus - enough for some authors to argue they were one and the same person.

If Damis/Apollonius had known of Jesus, he could have easily have been mentioned as a competitor. A story in which Apollonius bested Jesus in debate would not be un-expected.

Rating: COULD easily have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 2


PLINY THE ELDER

Gaius Plinius Secundus wrote a large Natural History in Rome c.80CE

Pliny wrote a great deal - his Natural History mentions HUNDREDS of people, major & minor - writers, leaders, poets, artists - often with as much reason as mentioning Jesus. (Of course like many other writers he talks about astronomy too, but never mentions the Star of Bethlehem or the darkness.)

It is not at all un-reasoble for this prolific writer to have mentioned Jesus or the Gospels events.

Rating: COULD easily have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 2


JUVENAL

Decimus Junius Juvenalis wrote sixteen satires in Rome in early 2nd century.

Lucian the Roman satirist DID ridicule Christians (as gullible, easily lead fools) in mid 2nd century. By the later time of Lucian, Christianity obviously was known to the wider Roman community. Whereas Juvenal wrote at a time when Christianity had only just started to rate a few tiny mentions (Pliny the Younger, Tacitus.)

Rating: COULD have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 2


MARTIAL

Marcus Valerius Martialus wrote satires in Rome in late 1st century.

Martial wrote a large body of poems about all sorts of things. He mentions many people, places, stories and issues - major and minor, within and without Rome, such as :
Stoic suffering of discomfort and death,
virgin's blood,
Roman funerary practices,
the way accused men look in court,
Roman soldiers mocking their leaders,
anointing the body with oil,
Molorchus the good shepherd,
Tutilius a minor rhetorician, Nestor the wise,
the (ugly) Temple of Jupiter,

This shows Martial mentions or alludes to many and varied people and issues.

He could easily have mentioned Jesus (or the Gospel events).

Rating: COULD have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 2


PETRONIUS

Petronius Arbiter wrote a large novel (a bawdy drama) the "Satyricon" c.60CE.

Petronius mentions all sorts of people and events in this large work, including :
a CRUCIFIXION !
a scene where guards are posted to stop a corpse being stolen,
a tomb scene of someone mistaking a person for a supernatural vision,
gods such as Bacchus and Ceres,
writers such as Sophocles and Euripides and Epicurus,
books such as the Iliad,
Romans such as Cato and Pompey,
people such as Hannibal, and the Governor of Ephesus,
female charioteers, slaves, merchants, Arabs, lawyers
baths, shipwrecks, meals...

This large work, cover MANY topics, including a CRUCIFIXION, and it was written just as Peter and Paul had come to Rome, allegedly. It could easily have mentioned Jesus.

Rating: COULD have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 2


PAUSANIAS

Pausanias wrote the massive Guide to Greece in mid 2nd century.

Pausanias' work is vast and the index covers over 70 pages of small print, I estimate a couple of THOUSAND names are mentioned. He mentions a large number of minor figues from within and without Greece.

He even mentions a Jewish prophetess - a figure so minor she is essentially unknown: "Then later than Demo there was a prophetic woman reared among the Jews beyond Palestine; her name was Sabbe." Phokis, Book X, 12, [5]

Pausanias also mentions the Jewish rebellion under Hadrian.

Rating: COULD easily have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 2


EPICTETUS

Epictetus is known for several books of Stoic religious and philosophic discourses in the early 2nd century. One of his disciples was Arrian, and thanks to him much of Epictetus' works are extant.

Epictetus DID apparently mention "the Galileans", which could be a reference to :
the early Christians,
or
the revolt under Judas the Galilean in early 1st century.

Either way, this shows quite clearly that Epictetus could refer to a figure such as Jesus.

Rating: COULD easily have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 2


AELIUS ARISTIDES

Aelius Aristides the mid 2nd century Greek Orator spoke and wrote a History of Rome and other subjects - he seems to refer to the Christians as "impious men from Palestine" (Orations 46.2)

If he could mention people from Palestine, he could easily have mentioned Jesus.

Rating: COULD easily have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 2


FRONTO

Marcus Cornelius Fronto of Rome wrote several letters in mid 2nd century.

According to Minucius Felix, he scandalised rites practiced by Roman Christians - so he could easily have mentioned Jesus.

Rating: COULD easily have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 2


PERSIUS

Aulus Persius Flaccus wrote six fairly long satires in Rome in the mid 1st century, of a rather philosophic nature.

The argument that no Roman satirist could be expected to mention Jesus, is proven wrong by the case of a Roman satirist who DID mention Jesus (but only as echoes of later Christian beliefs.)

Persius wrote a reasonably large body of work that mentions many people and issues.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 1


DIO CHRYSOSTOM

Dio Chrysostom (Cocceianus Dio) wrote many works and gave many speeches in various Roman and Greek centres in late 1st century, of which 80 survive e.g. the Euboicus.

Dio wrote a large number of works in the late 1st century - he certainly could have mentioned Jesus, if he knew of him.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 1


AULUS GELLIUS

Aulus Gellius wrote Attic Nights (Nights in Athens), a large compendium of many topics and which mentioned many people.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 1


LUCIUS APULEIUS

Lucius Apuleius wrote the Metamorphoses (the Golden Ass or Transformations of Lucius) and many other spiritual, historical, and philosophic works - several survive.

Rating: COULD have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 1


MARCUS AURELIUS

Marcus Aelius Aurelius Antoninus wrote the Stoic Meditations in mid 2nd century - he (apparently) refers once to the Christians in XI, 3.

Rating: COULD have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 1


MUSONIUS RUFUS

C. Musonius Rufus wrote on Stoic philosophy in Rome in mid 1st century.

Rating: COULD have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 1


HIEROCLES

Hierocles of Alexandria wrote on Stoic philosophy in late 1st century.

Rating: COULD have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 1


MAXIMUS of TYRE

Cassius Maximus Tyrius, a Greek NeoPlatonic philosopher, wrote many works in mid 2nd century.

Rating: COULD have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 1


ARRIAN

Arrian wrote a History of Alexander c.120CE.

The subject is not related, but Arrian wrote a very large work which mentioned HUNDREDS of people, some not from Alexander's time.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


APPIAN

Appian wrote a large Roman History (from the Gracchi to Caesar) in mid 2nd century.

It's not particularly likely that this specific writer would mention Jesus.
But,
he wrote a LARGE work which mentions HUNDREDS of people.
Appian does mention some issues of HIS day (mid 2nd century), e.g. a decision by Hadrian.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


THEON of SMYRNA

Theon of Smyrna wrote on astronomy/philosophy in early 2nd century.

Theon wrote about philosophy. If Jesus and his teachings were known, it is entirely plausible for to mention them.

Theon also wrote about astronomy.
If he had heard about the Star of Bethlehem or the Darkness (as an event, or from the Gospels) he could easily have mentioned it.

Apologists frequently cite Phlegon and Thallus, astronomers who mentioned eclipses (but NOT Jesus or the Gospel events, that is merely later Christian wishful thinking) as evidence for Jesus.

An astronomer could easily be expected to mention those incidents, especially when apologists claim other astronomers of the period did exactly that.

The silence of early astronomers about the Star of Bethlehem or the crucifixion darkness argues these "events" were unknown until later.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


QUINTILIAN

Marcus Fabius Quintilianus, wrote the "Education of an Orator" in Rome in late 1st century.

One of the things Jesus was allegedly noted for was his PUBLIC SPEECHES - e.g. the Sermon on the Mount, which supposedly drew and influenced large crowds.

If Quintilian had heard of Jesus or the Gospels events, he could have mentioned the allegedly famous speeches of Jesus.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


LUCIUS ANNAEUS FLORUS

Lucius Annaeus Florus wrote an Epitome of Roman History.

Although not directly on subject, Florus wrote a large work which mentions many names. He could have mentioned Jesus if he had known of him.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


LUCAN

Marcus Annaeus Lucanus wrote the Pharsalia (Civil War) in Rome in mid 1st century.

In his large poem, the Pharsalia, he mentions some events from later times, and he covers many different issues and people in passing.
He:
mentions an event from 56CE,
refers to places as far afield as Sicily and Kent,
refered to Stoic religious beliefs about the end of the world,
refers to many books and myths and persons and events not part of the main story.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


STATIUS

Publius Papinius Statius wrote numerous minor and epic poems (e.g. Ode to Sleep and the Thebaid) in Rome in late 1st century.

Statius wrote many works on several subjects, he could have mentioned Jesus.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


HERO of ALEXANDRIA

Hero(n) of Alexandria wrote many technical works, including astronomy.

If he had known of the Gospel stories about Jesus, he could have mentioned them.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


GEMINUS

Geminus wrote on mathematics astronomy in Greece.

If he had known of the Gospel stories about Jesus, he could have mentioned them.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


ALBINUS

Albinus taught on (neo-)Platonism in early 2nd century, a little survives.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


ARISTOCLES

Aristocles of Messene wrote On Philosophy, early 2nd century.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


APOLLODORUS

Apollodorus compiled a large Mythology in mid 2nd century.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


HEPHAESTION

Hephaestion of Alexandria wrote many works in mid 2nd century.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


SEXTUS EMPIRICUS

Sextus Empiricus wrote Outlines of Scepticism in mid 2nd century.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


WRITERS WHO COULD NOT BE EXPECTED TO HAVE MENTIONED JESUS

Dion Prusaeus
Paterculus
Ptolemy
Valerius Maximus
Pomponius Mela
Quintus Curtus Rufus
Lucius Junius Moderatus Columella
Favorinus
Phaedrus
Babrius
Silius Italicus
Marcus Manilius
Cleomedes
Dioscorides
Sextus Julius Frontinus
Nicomachus of Gerasa
Menelaus of Alexandria
Menodotus of Nicomedia
Tiberius Claudius Herodes Atticus
Valerius Flaccus


Kapyong
Kapyong is offline  
Old 05-30-2012, 03:51 AM   #179
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 802
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
Can you see a roman worshipping a jewish poverty stricken peasant who travels around healing for dinner scraps, avoids taxes and preaches to tax collectors to quit raping people? a man who travels with a few fishermen who in that time had status below a peasant? a man who had died a miserable death on a cross?
How does that become more likely if we assume Jesus was a historical figure?
Logical is offline  
Old 05-30-2012, 04:00 AM   #180
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 802
Default

Kapyong,

Thanks for the list. Why doesn't it include dates of birth and death?
Logical is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:24 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.