aa5874

No, No, No!!! You present propaganda and mis-leading information. This is completely unacceptable. You appear to be spreading erroneous information without making any attempt to correct your errors.

Justin DISTINTCLY made reference to the Memoirs of the Apostles called Gospels when he wrote about the Ritual of the Eucharist.

Justin did NOT make any reference to 1 Cor.11.26-29.

First Apology LXVI

tanya

nonsense.

Neither of us knows the dates of authorship of any of this crap.

Justin Martyr's explanation to the emperor can just as easily be drawn from Mark 14: 22-25, or gospel of Matthew. You have simply furnished yet another instance where Paul draws from the extant gospels.

outhouse

since pauls historicity and dating is not up for debate by proffessionals you cant say he didnt draw from paul.


with that said, you would have had a better arguement claiming the Eucharist was common oral tradition that paul and justin both pulled from.


then it should be easy peasy to get wiki updated and corrected. when I see that i'll bow out.

outhouse

Justin Martyr, 145,second Discourse to the Greeks quotes Galatians

does it not?

andrewcriddle

Probably not authentic.

Andrew Criddle

Duvduv

Of course there is no reasono on earth to accept the Justin text less critically than one would accept the epistles.

Just as in the case of the epistles there is not a drop of evidence that this Apology was ever written by anyone in the second century to any emperor, or that such an emperor ever received it. This is besides the lack of logic of the Apology itself as an appeal to an emperor.

andrewcriddle

There is a discussion at Justin and Paul

It concludes that although Justin and Paul share some distinctive ideas and vocabulary it cannot be established that Justin had a direct knowledge of Paul's letters.

Andrew Criddle

Toto

Give a specific reference to the chapter and verse in Galatians and the corresponding section in "Discourse to the Greeks" (there is no second Discourse to the Greeks.)

aa5874

You lack knowledge of scholarship. Scholars have NOT provided any actual evidence that the Pauline writings were composed before c 68 CE.

The Pauline writings are PRESUMED to be early by Scholars.

outhouse

correct

the link i was at had [second] written before it.

im at work ill grab the reffernce, for that and dig up all the other refferences