FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Science & Skepticism > Science Discussions
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-08-2005, 10:25 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 6,004
Default Multi-Vitamins: Faith-based medicine

Quote:
WASHINGTON, Sept. 6-Every day, President George Bush practices faith-based preventive medicine when he reaches for his daily multivitamin.

Like millions of his fellow Americans, Bush assumes that the multivitamin bestows vague generalized beneficial properties, although he and others would be hard-pressed to cite specifics. Indeed, there are scant solid data on whether multivitamins offer any benefit at all to healthy adults.
...
Yet the goodness is an article of faith. A multivitamin is not an insurance policy against disease or a guarantee of longevity. It may, in fact, be little more than just another substance for the body to excrete, at least for a healthy adult.
...
In the July 1, 2003 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine, the task force said that "the best studies suggested no clear benefit of taking vitamins" and there was "insufficient scientific evidence to recommend vitamin supplements as a way to prevent cancer or heart disease." Their conclusions were based on a review of the literature.
...
But the task force noted that taking vitamins according to the recommended daily allowances "does not cause harm."
This was an interesting take on the vitamin question, I thought. No evidence that, for the average, healthy adult, taking vitamins is either healthy or harmful.

Taken from here.
BioBeing is offline  
Old 09-08-2005, 11:21 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vienna, AUSTRIA
Posts: 6,147
Default

With a reasonable diet, extra intake of vitamins (and minerals) is usually not necessary. Just how sure can one be that diet is in the reasonable region, although this is probably much broader than many nutrition apostles would like to make us think?
Berthold is offline  
Old 09-08-2005, 11:47 AM   #3
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 352
Default

It's kind of like a "Pascal's Wager" on health.

I almost never take medications of any kind, including vitamins. I do eat a pretty well-balanced diet (I think).

My children were different, however. My sons both subsisted entirely on breast milk until they were 6 months old. Some whole grain cereals and vegetables were gradually added after that even though I nursed them until they were a year old.

The problems started when they were a little older. Kids can go through some very picky and stubborn stages with foods. Something they love one month, they will refuse the next. My sons had completely different preferences at different times.

For that reason, I used to give them a multi-vitamin twice a week.

My older son is 6'5" so I guess it didn't hurt!
Vicki is offline  
Old 09-08-2005, 11:54 AM   #4
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vienna, AUSTRIA
Posts: 6,147
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vicki
My sons had completely different preferences at different times.
One month like a Buddhist monk, the other like a Cro Magnon hunter? Both won't hurt them.
Berthold is offline  
Old 09-08-2005, 12:00 PM   #5
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 352
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Berthold
One month like a Buddhist monk, the other like a Cro Magnon hunter? Both won't hurt them.
If you mean going from strictly vegetarian to carnivorous, then yes, sometimes!

The problem with one of them was an intense dislike of all fruits and many vegetables, so I was a little concerned about Vitamin C. Luckily, he got over it and eats almost anything now.
Vicki is offline  
Old 09-08-2005, 12:07 PM   #6
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Monterey
Posts: 7,099
Default

There are men who require abnormally high amounts of folic acid, and if they don't get it, can get heart disease. As a result, many cardiologists now prescribe 400 mcg of folic acid, a member of the vitamin B complex, to men with heart disease.

We know that we don't always have good dietary habits; and we know that deficiency diseases can result; and we know that some of us suffer from abnormally large requirements for certain vitamins. Why take a chance? Cheap insurance.
Schneibster is offline  
Old 09-08-2005, 12:16 PM   #7
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Vienna, AUSTRIA
Posts: 6,147
Default

Beware of quacks, though. Trace elements are a related topic. There were, some years ago, preparations of germanium for sale. Actually, germanium is nonessential and even slightly toxic.
Berthold is offline  
Old 09-08-2005, 12:34 PM   #8
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,280
Default

hmmm,

Well I think that as well as having a good diet, having good social habits, adequate exercise and a positive outlook etc... can in general be more important than taking excessive indiscriminant supplements. These will have the body use everything it has, and release "good" chemicals and restrict "bad" chemicals. I don't want to get into the details, we all know about this anyway.

I think that TARGETED use of supplements to assist an already improved diet can be helpful. I kind of follow the Zone diet - though the sugar monkey is hard to kick. Through the control of oils, carbs and protein you can somewhat influence MAJOR hormones systems such as Insulin, Glucagon and Cortisol. Also you can control prostaglandins with can be inflammatory or anti-imflammatory - which is why omega 3s are important. Omega 3s also are part of brain cell membranes as well.

But, I would define omega-3s as a macronutrient not as supplement. Because historically we ate land animals that ate grass not corn or soybeans. Even eggs used to have more omega3s. So buying flax/fish oil pills is just putting back what our agricultural system has taken out. What other nutrients it has taken out?

I wonder about some of the geniuses of history and what they ate. I would love to get into the pantries of Archimedes, Euler or Einstein. But I am gonna guess they didn't eat lots of refined sugars or soybean oils.


I was gonna go through substances one by one, but running out of time.
I can list a few that I think are good, selenium, NAC, magnesium, zinc, Bs, gamma tocopherol (in walnuts), lutein (spinach), Lycopene (tomato). In fact the last three are more economical through the food rather than the supplement. Selenium can't be controlled in food, so a supplement is good IMO. Not sure about magnesium or zinc.
repoman is offline  
Old 09-08-2005, 02:17 PM   #9
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Last Seen Fleeing A Maximum Security Prison.
Posts: 4,457
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BioBeing
This was an interesting take on the vitamin question, I thought. No evidence that, for the average, healthy adult, taking vitamins is either healthy or harm
Average, healthy adult. Well if you aren't an average healthy adult, whatever that means, it isn't a big deal to spend a 5 cents a day (or less) on a generic multivitamin.
MadPhatCat is offline  
Old 09-09-2005, 11:16 AM   #10
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 1,031
Default

I always find it fascinating that we can figure out information about particles smaller than atoms, put people in space, and program semi-intelligent machines, yet we can't figure out what we should be eating.
kaelcarp is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:26 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.