FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-24-2006, 05:18 AM   #31
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 61,538
Default

The eastern mystics are not known to be that big on a literal God, so definitely Jesus didn't learn his lesson well (unless he learned from dualists there who are into a literal godhead) - that, or he was talking God out of one side of his mouth and mysticism out of the other.
premjan is offline  
Old 12-24-2006, 05:45 AM   #32
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: California
Posts: 2,615
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by premjan View Post
Usually Christian scholars say that the Gospel of Thomas, gnostic stuff etc. was actually manufactured by people following Hindu-type cults who wanted to make Christianity conform to it. They usually come up with some dates to support this as in gospel of thomas was of post-Jesus manufacture.

Wonder if his death is then a sort of 'abhimanyu' case where he didn't realize being spiritual would lead to his death - as he wonders at one point whether his God has forsaken him.

Again this sort of argument is made with respect to Sufism - claim that it originated with Muhammad though imparted only to some esoteric disciples and not to the others.
most of the NT is a post-Jesus concoction, and the Vatican has even stated that the NT cannot be taken as ultimate truth and in some parts is clearly wrong.

AS far as Sufism, im pretty sure it did not originate with Mohhamed. There is hardly anything in the Quran to support that claim.

If indeed Mohhamed was an enlightened Sufi, he would not have engaged in invasion or killing sprees. He would have been an Arab Buddha or Jesus, but he was not.
adren@line is offline  
Old 12-24-2006, 05:58 AM   #33
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 61,538
Default

I suppose Jesus was nonviolent but he was a bit of a revolutionary seditionist and he had some crazy beliefs such as the world would end soon, and that the world was created recently, that God was his father etc.

I am not entirely sure that Jesus was similar to an 'eastern mystic' - he said he came to bring not peace but war and is said to have cursed a tree to never have fruit. Of course you could argue he was an eastern mystic and all the bad stuff in Christianity came from Paul.

As for Muhammad not being a mystic or enlightened - that part could be true, though River (a Sufi on this board) would not agree.
premjan is offline  
Old 12-24-2006, 06:50 AM   #34
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

Jesus Goes Round the World!

After a stop in India, Jesus Traveled on to Japan, and then the crossed the Pacific Ocean to go to North America, where he appeared before the Native Americans! Jesus loved everyone in the whole wide world with all his heart, so he visited every person individually, spreading his message of peace and love, can't you tell that there was a huge change around the world in the 1st century, when his message of peace and love profoundly affected the world!!
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 12-24-2006, 06:50 AM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

Quote:
I suppose Jesus was nonviolent but he was a bit of a revolutionary seditionist and he had some crazy beliefs such as the world would end soon, and that the world was created recently, that God was his father etc.
Jesus didn't exist, so how could "he" be a revolutionary?
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 12-24-2006, 07:10 AM   #36
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 61,538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachi151 View Post
Jesus didn't exist, so how could "he" be a revolutionary?
Well, if he didn't exist, he didn't go to Kashmir.
premjan is offline  
Old 12-24-2006, 10:53 AM   #37
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 74
Default

If Jesus existed, would he have been aware of "Eastern philosophy" at all? I mean, historically did the peoples of Israel and the Near East at the time, know of, or have contact with the peoples of India or the Far east? Would they have even known of their existence?
the minnow is offline  
Old 12-24-2006, 11:21 AM   #38
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Auckland
Posts: 108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the minnow View Post
If Jesus existed, would he have been aware of "Eastern philosophy" at all?
His old man built the place, so I guess he'd know.
The Atheist is offline  
Old 12-24-2006, 11:31 AM   #39
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the minnow View Post
If Jesus existed, would he have been aware of "Eastern philosophy" at all? I mean, historically did the peoples of Israel and the Near East at the time, know of, or have contact with the peoples of India or the Far east? Would they have even known of their existence?
The conquest of Alexander united everything from India to Greece, and there had been trade through that region for a long time. The Buddhists texts had been translated into Greek by about the 2nd or 2st century BCE. There was a lot of contact and trade between India and the Greek speaking world, as far as Egypt and Greece by the 1st century CE.
Malachi151 is offline  
Old 12-25-2006, 03:13 AM   #40
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Falls Creek, Oz.
Posts: 11,192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malachi151 View Post
The conquest of Alexander united everything from India to Greece, and there had been trade through that region for a long time. The Buddhists texts had been translated into Greek by about the 2nd or 2st century BCE. There was a lot of contact and trade between India and the Greek speaking world, as far as Egypt and Greece by the 1st century CE.
Not only that, Julia Domna was quite influential, and the
publication and distribution of the work of Philostratus
"The Life of Apollonius of Tyana" would have been of
considerable scale.

In fact, Eusebius of Caesarea writes a refutation:
THE TREATISE OF EUSEBIUS, THE SON OF PAMPHILUS, AGAINST THE LIFE OF APOLLONIUS OF TYANA WRITTEN BY PHILOSTRATUS, OCCASIONED BY THE PARALLEL DRAWN BY HIEROCLES BETWEEN HIM AND CHRIST.

In order for Eusebius to have written the considerable refutation above,
the story concerning Apollonius trecking to India would have been
popular knowledge, if not in the first and second centuries, then most
certainly in the third (it was published c.216-220).

In fact, the above treatise by Eusebius actually mentions "India"
or "Indians" two dozen times.
mountainman is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:29 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.