![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 3,103
|
![]()
without a community how would you explain the fact these gospels were written (implying an audience), and were read and copied, for at least one hundred years before being collated?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 3,103
|
![]()
sure, presumably what was not copied is now lost to us (some were recently rediscovered at dead sea and nag hammadi) and what were copied, especially religious literature, were copied b/c they represented some community interests.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
![]()
"Community interest"? If by community you mean society at large, then you're abusing the scholarship behind the word and its implications. Community in gospel scholarship means a group apart from others, characterized by a specific locale, with an understanding that was different from others alike it. For example, Matthew's "community" was said to be Jewish-Christian, Mark's "community" said to be Adoptionist, then you have the Lukan community, the Johnannine community, etc... This is your stated assumption, whether you meant it or not.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|