FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Philosophy & Religious Studies > Moral Foundations & Principles
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-13-2007, 03:15 PM   #11
LuisGarcia
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad_Michael View Post
The statement of the thread title of this discussion.
Then may I offer my apologies for not including a question mark at the end of the title thread.

Quote:
Absolutism requires an absolute God. I agree.
I mean this in all seriousness, did you read anything written in this thread except the title? Only you don't seem to be agreeing with anyone. The point is that the one position that is incompatible with absolute morality is the theists.

Quote:
If there is no God, there can be no absolute rules
Please explain

Quote:
(absolute truth,
Please explain
Quote:
or absolute facts).
Please explain

Quote:
I stated my agreement with this concept because I understand it is a minority position that is
much denigrated and commonly abused.
Oh, yeah, I've never encountered the "only-absolute-morality-means-anything-and-you-need-god-for-it-therefore-atheists-are-immoral" argument before. Thank goodness you're here to fight the good fight on behalf of the moral minority.

Still, you can dream of the day when you're in such a large majority that those who can see the glaring flaws in your logic are forced to check that they themselves are not making stupid logic errors because they're being shouted down by your moral majority, can't you?
 
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:31 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.