FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-19-2012, 05:10 AM   #51
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The only Carribean port not in the Tropics.
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by la70119 View Post
Nor was it because the Emperors were deified at their funerals with their images fastened to cruciform tropaea, i.e., crosses. It was because (they claimed) Jesus Christ was put to death through torture by being nailed to such a tropaeum.* And in this case, Justin is correct.
That is also new to me. What is the evidence that the Emperors were deified at their funerals with their images fastened to cruciform tropaea, i.e., crosses?
It's right there in Justin Martyr's I Apology.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin Martyr, I Apology 55
Chapter 55. Symbols of the cross.

But in no instance, not even in any of those called sons of Jupiter, did they imitate the being crucified; for it was not understood by them, all the things said of it having been put symbolically. And this, as the prophet foretold, is the greatest symbol of His power and role; as is also proved by the things which fall under our observation. For consider all the things in the world, whether without this form they could be administered or have any community. For the sea is not traversed except that trophy which is called a sail abide safe in the ship; and the earth is not ploughed without it: diggers and mechanics do not their work, except with tools which have this shape. And the human form differs from that of the irrational animals in nothing else than in its being erect and having the hands extended, and having on the face extending from the forehead what is called the nose, through which there is respiration for the living creature; and this shows no other form than that of the cross. And so it was said by the prophet, “The breath before our face is the Lord Christ.” And the power of this form is shown by your own symbols on what are called “vexilla” [banners] and trophies, with which all your state possessions are made, using these as the insignia of your power and government, even though you do so unwittingly. And with this form you consecrate the images of your emperors when they die, and you name them gods by inscriptions. Since, therefore, we have urged you both by reason and by an evident form, and to the utmost of our ability, we know that now we are blameless even though you disbelieve; for our part is done and finished.
It's right there, in Justin Martyr's convenient little chapter. Minucius Felix (Octavian 29) alludes to it and Tertullian states it plainly enough, even though not as obviously as Justin Martyr.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Minucius Felix, Octavian 29
Crosses, moreover, we neither worship nor wish for. You, indeed, who consecrate gods of wood, adore wooden crosses perhaps as parts of your gods. For your very standards, as well as your banners; and flags of your camp, what else are they but crosses glided and adorned? Your victorious trophies not only imitate the appearance of a simple cross, but also that of a man affixed to it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tertullian, Apoligeticus 12.3
You put Christians on crosses and stakes: what image is not formed from the clay in the first instance, set on cross and stake? The body of your god is first consecrated on the gibbet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tertullian, Apoligeticus 16.7
[7] Every stake fixed in an upright position is a portion of the cross; we render our adoration, if you will have it so, to a god entire and complete. We have shown before that your deities are derived from shapes modelled from the cross. But you also worship victories, for in your trophies the cross is the heart of the trophy.
There. On this point, my part is done and finished.
la70119 is offline  
Old 04-19-2012, 05:19 AM   #52
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The only Carribean port not in the Tropics.
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by la70119 View Post
Problem is, the Romans never used a tropaeum as a means of torture, suspension and execution. That would be elevating a criminal as a god
Not sure that I am reading that correctly. Are you saying the Romans never used the cross as a means to execution?
No, I am saying that there were two different kinds of crosses.

One was a crux, and was used to execute people. It was actually more like a mast or a utility pole and was probably jerry-rigged. Epigraphy shows that it was also equipped with a spike for a seat that affixed the culprit to the cross by penetration so the nails didn't have to do all the work. Perhaps other shapes (X, Y, etc.) were used, too.

The other kind of cross was a votive cross, a tropaeum and was a symbol of divinity and victory because it resembled the rays of the sun. This was usually not jerry-rigged for obvious reasons!
la70119 is offline  
Old 04-19-2012, 05:33 AM   #53
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The only Carribean port not in the Tropics.
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by la70119 View Post
Problem is, the Romans never used a tropaeum as a means of torture, suspension and execution. That would be elevating a criminal as a god
Wow, would that have ever outraged the Jewish leaders! Pilate would never have wanted to thwart them. That's why he only put up sign that Jesus was the King of the Jews, nothing about God.
Actually had Pilate figured that out, and was confident the nails wouldn't let go, he definitely WOULD have nailed him up on a tropaeum. Problem is, your Gospels have Pilate act as a coward, something that is TOTALLY out-of-character for him, and has him nail up a Child of a Ghost.

Now, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus and Tertullian all talk about the five-pointed cross where the fifth point was a "seat" that projected upward, securing the nailed-up person to the cross by penetration. Origen talks of the cross as a "thorn" (actually it's Celsus but even in a couple places Origen himself slips up instead of just quoting). And other Ante-Nicene Fathers can be interpreted as referring to this five-pointed cross without violating lexica definitions or linguistic rules.

But after Constantine abolished this peculiar form of crucifixion, the church swapped out the five-pointed crux for the tropaeum, and called the tropaeum, the crux! Gee, I wonder why...? :devil1:
la70119 is offline  
Old 04-19-2012, 05:36 AM   #54
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by la70119 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
That's a new one to me. What is the evidence that the ancients considered direct impalement like being pierced through with a tusk of a wild boar as a form of crucifixion?
Pliny Elder, Natural History, 8.18 (for Latin text at Perseus Digital Library, NH 8.20 -- they have it screwed up)
Here is his "Natural History" in English. I can't find anything in 8.18 or 8.20 (which seems to be about lions in the arena). Can you find the passage you mean?
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/...3Achapter%3D20

I can't readily find English translations of Seneca, so can't check the others unfortunately.
GakuseiDon is offline  
Old 04-19-2012, 05:37 AM   #55
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The only Carribean port not in the Tropics.
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by la70119 View Post
...
Now going back to Justin Martyr's claim of dissimilarity at hand:

It wasn't because of the type or violence of the death that caused Justin Martyr to explain that none of the Sons of Jupiter (either Panhellenic Gods OR the Antonine Caesars) ever imitated Jesus Christ. ....
This link looks like an interesting source.

Early Christian Literature: Christ and culture in the second and third centuries
(or via: amazon.co.uk)
By Helen Rhee
Thanks for the link! :wave:
la70119 is offline  
Old 04-19-2012, 05:45 AM   #56
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The only Carribean port not in the Tropics.
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by la70119 View Post

Pliny Elder, Natural History, 8.18 (for Latin text at Perseus Digital Library, NH 8.20 -- they have it screwed up)
Here is his "Natural History" in English. I can't find anything in 8.18 or 8.20 (which seems to be about lions in the arena). Can you find the passage you mean?
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/...3Achapter%3D20

I can't readily find English translations of Seneca, so can't check the others unfortunately.
It's supposed to be Book 8, Chapter 18, pgh. 47. Perseus lists it by books and chapters. LacusCurtius has the Latin Text, here. It's Historia Naturalis Liber VIII, scroll down to xviii.46 & 47.
English Text of "crucified" (impaled) Lions at Perseus Digital Library here.

CHAP. 18. THE DIFFERENT SPECIES OF LIONS.

I need to get away from the 'puter for a while, I'll be back later. If I have to, I'll translate for you.

The problem is, the Greek and Latin are frequently mistranslated, because the translators couldn't get out of their head Jesus nailed to a four-pointed cross, or one that has a footrest. Once you do that like Gunnar Samuelsson did a couple of years back, the interpretation can change drastically. (Samuelsson says neither the Greek or Latin can support the traditional image of the Crucifixion.)
la70119 is offline  
Old 04-19-2012, 06:04 AM   #57
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by la70119 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
That is also new to me. What is the evidence that the Emperors were deified at their funerals with their images fastened to cruciform tropaea, i.e., crosses?
It's right there in Justin Martyr's I Apology.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Justin Martyr, I Apology 55
Chapter 55. Symbols of the cross.

But in no instance, not even in any of those called sons of Jupiter, did they imitate the being crucified; for it was not understood by them, all the things said of it having been put symbolically. And this, as the prophet foretold, is the greatest symbol of His power and role; as is also proved by the things which fall under our observation. For consider all the things in the world, whether without this form they could be administered or have any community. For the sea is not traversed except that trophy which is called a sail abide safe in the ship; and the earth is not ploughed without it: diggers and mechanics do not their work, except with tools which have this shape. And the human form differs from that of the irrational animals in nothing else than in its being erect and having the hands extended, and having on the face extending from the forehead what is called the nose, through which there is respiration for the living creature; and this shows no other form than that of the cross. And so it was said by the prophet, “The breath before our face is the Lord Christ.” And the power of this form is shown by your own symbols on what are called “vexilla” [banners] and trophies, with which all your state possessions are made, using these as the insignia of your power and government, even though you do so unwittingly. And with this form you consecrate the images of your emperors when they die, and you name them gods by inscriptions. Since, therefore, we have urged you both by reason and by an evident form, and to the utmost of our ability, we know that now we are blameless even though you disbelieve; for our part is done and finished.
It's right there, in Justin Martyr's convenient little chapter.
No, it isn't there as far as I can see. Justin is explaining that the pagans also use the sign of the cross, so it isn't so bad. His examples:

1, The mast on a ship has the shape of a cross
2. Banners used by the Roman army have the shape of a cross
3. Images of emperors when they die, where they are named gods by inscriptions.

For (3), Justin is talking about sculptures made after the Emperors die, with inscriptions claiming them to be gods. Tertullian goes into more details, which I will give below.

Quote:
Originally Posted by la70119 View Post
Minucius Felix (Octavian 29) alludes to it and Tertullian states it plainly enough, even though not as obviously as Justin Martyr.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Minucius Felix, Octavian 29
Crosses, moreover, we neither worship nor wish for. You, indeed, who consecrate gods of wood, adore wooden crosses perhaps as parts of your gods. For your very standards, as well as your banners; and flags of your camp, what else are they but crosses glided and adorned? Your victorious trophies not only imitate the appearance of a simple cross, but also that of a man affixed to it.
That's right. Justin Martyr and Tertullian say the same.

Quote:
Originally Posted by la70119 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tertullian, Apoligeticus 12.3
You put Christians on crosses and stakes: what image is not formed from the clay in the first instance, set on cross and stake? The body of your god is first consecrated on the gibbet.
And the passage goes on to clearly describe that these images are sculptures, which were built up on a cross-like stake:
You put Christians on crosses and stakes: what image is not formed from the clay in the first instance, set on cross and stake? The body of your god is first consecrated on the gibbet. You tear the sides of Christians with your claws; but in the case of your own gods, axes, and planes, and rasps are put to work more vigorously on every member of the body. We lay our heads upon the block; before the lead, and the glue, and the nails are put in requisition, your deities are headless. We are cast to the wild beasts, while you attach them to Bacchus, and Cybele, and Cælestis. We are burned in the flames; so, too, are they in their original lump. We are condemned to the mines; from these your gods originate.
Tertullian is even clearer in his "Ad nationes":
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/03061.htm
As for him who affirms that we are "the priesthood of a cross," we shall claim him as our co-religionist. A cross is, in its material, a sign of wood; among yourselves also the object of worship is a wooden figure. Only, while with you the figure is a human one, with us the wood is its own figure. Never mind for the present what is the shape, provided the material is the same: the form, too, is of no importance, if so be it be the actual body of a god. If, however, there arises a question of difference on this point what, (let me ask,) is the difference between the Athenian Pallas, or the Pharian Ceres, and wood formed into a cross, when each is represented by a rough stock, without form, and by the merest rudiment of a statue of unformed wood? Every piece of timber which is fixed in the ground in an erect position is a part of a cross, and indeed the greater portion of its mass. But an entire cross is attributed to us, with its transverse beam, of course, and its projecting seat. Now you have the less to excuse you, for you dedicate to religion only a mutilated imperfect piece of wood, while others consecrate to the sacred purpose a complete structure. The truth, however, after all is, that your religion is all cross, as I shall show. You are indeed unaware that your gods in their origin have proceeded from this hated cross. Now, every image, whether carved out of wood or stone, or molten in metal, or produced out of any other richer material, must needs have had plastic hands engaged in its formation. Well, then, this modeller, before he did anything else, hit upon the form of a wooden cross, because even our own body assumes as its natural position the latent and concealed outline of a cross. Since the head rises upwards, and the back takes a straight direction, and the shoulders project laterally, if you simply place a man with his arms and hands outstretched, you will make the general outline of a cross. Starting, then, from this rudimental form and prop, as it were, he applies a covering of clay, and so gradually completes the limbs, and forms the body, and covers the cross within with the shape which he meant to impress upon the clay; then from this design, with the help of compasses and leaden moulds, he has got all ready for his image which is to be brought out into marble, or clay, or whatever the material be of which he has determined to make his god. (This, then, is the process after the cross-shaped frame, the clay; after the clay, the god. In a well-understood routine, the cross passes into a god through the clayey medium. The cross then you consecrate, and from it the consecrated (deity) begins to derive his origin.
And still nothing to do with Emperors being depicted on a cross-shape at their funerals.
GakuseiDon is offline  
Old 04-19-2012, 06:20 AM   #58
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by la70119 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by GakuseiDon View Post
Here is his "Natural History" in English. I can't find anything in 8.18 or 8.20 (which seems to be about lions in the arena). Can you find the passage you mean?
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/...3Achapter%3D20

I can't readily find English translations of Seneca, so can't check the others unfortunately.
It's supposed to be Book 8, Chapter 18, pgh. 47. Perseus lists it by books and chapters. LacusCurtius has the Latin Text, here. It's Historia Naturalis Liber VIII, scroll down to xviii.46 & 47.
English Text of "crucified" (impaled) Lions at Perseus Digital Library here.

CHAP. 18. THE DIFFERENT SPECIES OF LIONS.
No, nothing there. It talks about lions be put on a cross as a deterrent for other lions (which is interesting). But nothing about being pierced through by an animal as the equivalent of crucifixion. Here is the text:
CHAP. 18.—THE DIFFERENT SPECIES OF LIONS.

There are two species of lions; in the one the body is shorter and more compact, and the mane more crisp and curly;1 these are more timid than those with a longer body and straight hair, which, in fact, have no fear of wounds. The males raise the leg like the dog, when they pass their urine;2 which has a most disagreeable odour, the same being the case too with their breath. They seldom drink, and only take food every other day;3 when they have gorged themselves, they will sometimes go without food for three days. They swallow their food whole, without mastication, so far as they are able; and when they have taken more than the stomach can possibly receive, they extract part of it by thrusting their claws into the throat; the same too, if, when full, they have occasion to take to flight. That they are very long-lived is proved by the fact, that many of them are found without teeth. Polybius,4 the companion of Æmilianus, tells us, that when they become aged they will attack men, as they have no longer sufficient strength for the pursuit of wild beasts. It is then that they lay siege to the cities of Africa; and for this reason it was, that he, as well as Scipio, had seen some of them hung upon a cross; it being supposed that others, through dread of a similar punishment, might be deterred from committing the like outrages.
Quote:
Originally Posted by la70119 View Post
I need to get away from the 'puter for a while, I'll be back later. If I have to, I'll translate for you.
Thank you, that would be great.
GakuseiDon is offline  
Old 04-19-2012, 12:49 PM   #59
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago Metro
Posts: 1,259
Default

Another figure you might want to look into is R. Joshua ben Hananiah. I've heard him proposed as a "prototype" of the Jesus of the gospels. It's been a while since I read about him, but if I recall correctly, I think it might have been in one of Jacob Neusner's books. I'll take a look tonight and see if I can narrow it down for you.

Regards,
Sarai
Sarai is offline  
Old 04-19-2012, 02:42 PM   #60
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 49
Default

Please let me know if I listed something wrong or if you have an additional source to recommend.

Reading list/sources:


- Jesus Potter Harry Christ: Going Pagan: The Forgotten Prefigures of Christ
- Justin Martyr: Analogies to the history of Christ
- Asclepius: The God of Medicine (perhaps?)
- Justin Martyr: Apologies
- Early Christian Literature: Christ and culture in the second and third centuries
shalak is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:02 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.