Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-19-2012, 05:10 AM | #51 | ||||||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The only Carribean port not in the Tropics.
Posts: 359
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||
04-19-2012, 05:19 AM | #52 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The only Carribean port not in the Tropics.
Posts: 359
|
Quote:
One was a crux, and was used to execute people. It was actually more like a mast or a utility pole and was probably jerry-rigged. Epigraphy shows that it was also equipped with a spike for a seat that affixed the culprit to the cross by penetration so the nails didn't have to do all the work. Perhaps other shapes (X, Y, etc.) were used, too. The other kind of cross was a votive cross, a tropaeum and was a symbol of divinity and victory because it resembled the rays of the sun. This was usually not jerry-rigged for obvious reasons! |
|
04-19-2012, 05:33 AM | #53 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The only Carribean port not in the Tropics.
Posts: 359
|
Quote:
Now, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus and Tertullian all talk about the five-pointed cross where the fifth point was a "seat" that projected upward, securing the nailed-up person to the cross by penetration. Origen talks of the cross as a "thorn" (actually it's Celsus but even in a couple places Origen himself slips up instead of just quoting). And other Ante-Nicene Fathers can be interpreted as referring to this five-pointed cross without violating lexica definitions or linguistic rules. But after Constantine abolished this peculiar form of crucifixion, the church swapped out the five-pointed crux for the tropaeum, and called the tropaeum, the crux! Gee, I wonder why...? :devil1: |
|
04-19-2012, 05:36 AM | #54 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
|
Quote:
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/...3Achapter%3D20 I can't readily find English translations of Seneca, so can't check the others unfortunately. |
|
04-19-2012, 05:37 AM | #55 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The only Carribean port not in the Tropics.
Posts: 359
|
Quote:
|
||
04-19-2012, 05:45 AM | #56 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The only Carribean port not in the Tropics.
Posts: 359
|
Quote:
English Text of "crucified" (impaled) Lions at Perseus Digital Library here. CHAP. 18. THE DIFFERENT SPECIES OF LIONS. I need to get away from the 'puter for a while, I'll be back later. If I have to, I'll translate for you. The problem is, the Greek and Latin are frequently mistranslated, because the translators couldn't get out of their head Jesus nailed to a four-pointed cross, or one that has a footrest. Once you do that like Gunnar Samuelsson did a couple of years back, the interpretation can change drastically. (Samuelsson says neither the Greek or Latin can support the traditional image of the Crucifixion.) |
||
04-19-2012, 06:04 AM | #57 | |||||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
|
Quote:
1, The mast on a ship has the shape of a cross 2. Banners used by the Roman army have the shape of a cross 3. Images of emperors when they die, where they are named gods by inscriptions. For (3), Justin is talking about sculptures made after the Emperors die, with inscriptions claiming them to be gods. Tertullian goes into more details, which I will give below. Quote:
Quote:
You put Christians on crosses and stakes: what image is not formed from the clay in the first instance, set on cross and stake? The body of your god is first consecrated on the gibbet. You tear the sides of Christians with your claws; but in the case of your own gods, axes, and planes, and rasps are put to work more vigorously on every member of the body. We lay our heads upon the block; before the lead, and the glue, and the nails are put in requisition, your deities are headless. We are cast to the wild beasts, while you attach them to Bacchus, and Cybele, and Cælestis. We are burned in the flames; so, too, are they in their original lump. We are condemned to the mines; from these your gods originate.Tertullian is even clearer in his "Ad nationes": http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/03061.htm As for him who affirms that we are "the priesthood of a cross," we shall claim him as our co-religionist. A cross is, in its material, a sign of wood; among yourselves also the object of worship is a wooden figure. Only, while with you the figure is a human one, with us the wood is its own figure. Never mind for the present what is the shape, provided the material is the same: the form, too, is of no importance, if so be it be the actual body of a god. If, however, there arises a question of difference on this point what, (let me ask,) is the difference between the Athenian Pallas, or the Pharian Ceres, and wood formed into a cross, when each is represented by a rough stock, without form, and by the merest rudiment of a statue of unformed wood? Every piece of timber which is fixed in the ground in an erect position is a part of a cross, and indeed the greater portion of its mass. But an entire cross is attributed to us, with its transverse beam, of course, and its projecting seat. Now you have the less to excuse you, for you dedicate to religion only a mutilated imperfect piece of wood, while others consecrate to the sacred purpose a complete structure. The truth, however, after all is, that your religion is all cross, as I shall show. You are indeed unaware that your gods in their origin have proceeded from this hated cross. Now, every image, whether carved out of wood or stone, or molten in metal, or produced out of any other richer material, must needs have had plastic hands engaged in its formation. Well, then, this modeller, before he did anything else, hit upon the form of a wooden cross, because even our own body assumes as its natural position the latent and concealed outline of a cross. Since the head rises upwards, and the back takes a straight direction, and the shoulders project laterally, if you simply place a man with his arms and hands outstretched, you will make the general outline of a cross. Starting, then, from this rudimental form and prop, as it were, he applies a covering of clay, and so gradually completes the limbs, and forms the body, and covers the cross within with the shape which he meant to impress upon the clay; then from this design, with the help of compasses and leaden moulds, he has got all ready for his image which is to be brought out into marble, or clay, or whatever the material be of which he has determined to make his god. (This, then, is the process after the cross-shaped frame, the clay; after the clay, the god. In a well-understood routine, the cross passes into a god through the clayey medium. The cross then you consecrate, and from it the consecrated (deity) begins to derive his origin.And still nothing to do with Emperors being depicted on a cross-shape at their funerals. |
|||||||
04-19-2012, 06:20 AM | #58 | ||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 5,714
|
Quote:
CHAP. 18.—THE DIFFERENT SPECIES OF LIONS.Thank you, that would be great. |
||
04-19-2012, 12:49 PM | #59 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chicago Metro
Posts: 1,259
|
Another figure you might want to look into is R. Joshua ben Hananiah. I've heard him proposed as a "prototype" of the Jesus of the gospels. It's been a while since I read about him, but if I recall correctly, I think it might have been in one of Jacob Neusner's books. I'll take a look tonight and see if I can narrow it down for you.
Regards, Sarai |
04-19-2012, 02:42 PM | #60 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 49
|
Please let me know if I listed something wrong or if you have an additional source to recommend.
Reading list/sources: - Jesus Potter Harry Christ: Going Pagan: The Forgotten Prefigures of Christ - Justin Martyr: Analogies to the history of Christ - Asclepius: The God of Medicine (perhaps?) - Justin Martyr: Apologies - Early Christian Literature: Christ and culture in the second and third centuries |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|