FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-07-2010, 10:32 AM   #131
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dancing
Posts: 9,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlichter View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by show_no_mercy View Post
Because you're reading it overly literally, you miss out on the metaphor. Do you think that Jesus is god's wife? Or is it Israel? "Israel" has always been a singlular identity, that's the entire point of Deutero-Isaiah. In 53 Israel suffers for the sins of individual Jews.

No matter, though. In their arrogance, Christians always think they know the Hebrew bible better than Jews do.
ok, then you should not have any trouble interpretting the passage with this in mind and answering the questions. [...]
Again, you seem to be purposefully ignoring the metaphor. Israel is the servant, the Jews are fucking it up. That is the theme of this section of Deutero-Isaiah, and is the theme of the entire Torah.

If I said that America is going down the drain for our mistakes, would you then conclude that "America" is some person?
show_no_mercy is offline  
Old 01-07-2010, 10:37 AM   #132
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,796
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlichter
.......you should not have any trouble interpretting the passage with this in mind and answering the questions.
And you should not have any trouble discussing Isaiah 53 with Jews at 800-477-6631. If you do contact the Jews, please let us know if you are able to convince them that Isaiah 53 refers to Jesus. Perhaps it would help if you ask one of them to make some posts in this thread.
Johnny Skeptic is offline  
Old 01-07-2010, 10:37 AM   #133
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sschlichter View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by show_no_mercy View Post
No matter, though. In their arrogance, Christians always think they know the Hebrew bible better than Jews do.
ok, then you should not have any trouble interpretting the passage with this in mind and answering the questions...
dude, have you studied anything about ANE texts and ideas? Are you basing all your interpretation on English translations? Have you discussed any of this with knowledgable Jews? (and don't bother with "putting on the mind of Christ" or somesuch, there are other places to bleat about that sort of thing)
bacht is offline  
Old 01-07-2010, 11:22 AM   #134
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
How it was constructed or from what base doesn’t change the interpretation here. If it was built from a bunch of pieces of the OT doesn’t really change what they were trying to build, which was an anti king figure. Regardless if he was historical or mythical, the point being made is still the same.
I'm not convinced Jesus is an anti-king figure at all. If anything, the gospels promote compliance with Rome, so much so, that some have gone as far as to speculate that Rome itself constructed the gospel story.
spamandham is offline  
Old 01-07-2010, 11:35 AM   #135
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
Ok what do you think the Kingdom of Heaven is, if not a political movement?
The kingdom of heaven refers to an internal state of being - enlightenment if you will, not a political movement. Where are you even getting that idea from?
spamandham is offline  
Old 01-07-2010, 11:47 AM   #136
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
I'm not convinced Jesus is an anti-king figure at all. If anything, the gospels promote compliance with Rome, so much so, that some have gone as far as to speculate that Rome itself constructed the gospel story.
His compliance with Rome is how you have to be if you want to spread your message without the threat of Rome snuffing you out before you even get going.

If it’s not an anti king, what are they portraying in the gospels?
Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
The kingdom of heaven refers to an internal state of being - enlightenment if you will, not a political movement. Where are you even getting that idea from?
I’m getting the idea from the options available that make sense and the fact that most religious movements have political intentions not just pushing philosophy for philosophy’s sake. Where are you getting the idea that it’s an internal state and nothing else?

Enlightenment about what? And what would be the expected outcome of an enlightened people? Same ol shit and slavery or would the enlightenment of the people create a new kind of world order?
Elijah is offline  
Old 01-07-2010, 11:48 AM   #137
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spamandham View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
Ok what do you think the Kingdom of Heaven is, if not a political movement?
The kingdom of heaven refers to an internal state of being - enlightenment if you will, not a political movement. Where are you even getting that idea from?
Or, more literally, the New Age after the Day of the Lord, a new heaven and earth without death - technically we're still waiting for this, it's just been postponed indefinitely...
bacht is offline  
Old 01-07-2010, 11:51 AM   #138
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bacht View Post
Or, more literally, the New Age after the Day of the Lord, a new heaven and earth without death - technically we're still waiting for this, it's just been postponed indefinitely...
Isn't death supposed to be defeated after the rulers are cast out? Or are you taking the rulers to be something purely supernatural with no real world counterparts?
Elijah is offline  
Old 01-07-2010, 12:17 PM   #139
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elijah View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by bacht View Post
Or, more literally, the New Age after the Day of the Lord, a new heaven and earth without death - technically we're still waiting for this, it's just been postponed indefinitely...
Isn't death supposed to be defeated after the rulers are cast out? Or are you taking the rulers to be something purely supernatural with no real world counterparts?
There are no supernatural phenomena, and death is as inevitable as ever imo. But you asked what the Kingdom of Heaven meant to primitive Christians. The Zealots wanted to fight their way to the new age, while Christians apparently just waited. Instead of a New Jerusalem they got the Catholic church :huh:
bacht is offline  
Old 01-07-2010, 12:23 PM   #140
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MidWest
Posts: 1,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bacht View Post

There are no supernatural phenomena, and death is as inevitable as ever imo. But you asked what the Kingdom of Heaven meant to primitive Christians. The Zealots wanted to fight their way to the new age, while Christians apparently just waited. Instead of a New Jerusalem they got the Catholic church :huh:
It wasn't that they waited. They were promoting a spiritual king. Do you see the political ramifications of that in a world of earthly kings ruling over mankind?

What I was asking though was; wasn't a removal of the rulers expected before a return from our fallen state to eternal life?
Elijah is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:51 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.