Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-26-2007, 08:49 PM | #121 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,107
|
Quote:
Of course, I don't think his real name was Jesus, either, if in fact he existed. Old Ygg |
|
04-26-2007, 08:59 PM | #122 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: usa
Posts: 272
|
Emmanuel means God is with us and Jesus means God rescues, kind of the same meaning.
|
04-26-2007, 09:01 PM | #123 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: usa
Posts: 272
|
I don't think he has any fake attributes. I think He was a healer. I think He did perform miracles. I think He is the Messiah.
|
04-26-2007, 09:13 PM | #124 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: pdx
Posts: 223
|
|
04-26-2007, 09:34 PM | #125 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 5,310
|
|
04-26-2007, 09:47 PM | #126 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,107
|
|
04-26-2007, 09:51 PM | #127 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,107
|
Quote:
Of course, there was no faith for anyone who actually knew Jesus. Sort of a stumbling block to the current fad of believing that faith alone is what is necessary. Old Ygg |
|
04-26-2007, 10:11 PM | #128 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: usa
Posts: 272
|
Quote:
"Lay not up yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and dust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal. But lay up yourselves treasures in Heaven, where neither moth or rust doth corrupt and where thieves do not break through or steal: For where your treasure is there your heart will also be." Did I help? Earthly things, our bodies included. Our bodies are just a way to get around in this place. They too are just a possesion we will no longer have when we die. |
|
04-26-2007, 10:16 PM | #129 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: usa
Posts: 272
|
Quote:
|
|
04-26-2007, 10:36 PM | #130 |
Contributor
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11,525
|
While it's true that the Bible does contain some actual history, so does Tom Sawyer. That doesn't make it a history text. I'm not aware of anyone seriously interested in history who would reject EVERYTHING in the Bible simply because parts of it are obvious myth and legend. It isn't an all or nothing proposition. It's perfectly valid to accept the ordinary claims that can be corroborated, while rejecting the wild claims that can not.
We do the exact same thing when reading Josephus. He makes all kinds of crazy wild claims about flying chariots etc., yet he also provides us details regarding ordinary events. Must we apply an 'all or nothing' approach to Jospehus as well? Most ancient texts contain some elements of the fantastic. It's common practice to use such claims to understand the culture, but we don't take them seriously, because we know we are dealing with a pre-scientific superstitious culture that believed gods and demons were behind every stone. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|