FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-02-2004, 03:22 PM   #71
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 496
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dado
it happens here to. i am - it is rumored - some kind of moderate theist - and i have been told in no uncertain terms here on IIDB to piss off. usually by a high school kid who's just discovered Sartre but is still an SAT (or two) away from formal logic.

thin skin and chat boards don't mix, whatever the topic.

What disturbs people’s minds is not the events but the judgment of events
________Epictetus, 500 B.C. Stoic philosopher

New 10.
Newton Joseph is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 03:33 PM   #72
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jinto
It's interesting to note though, this phenomenon: when it becomes apparent that the biblical description of hell (and of God's actions in general) contradict the traditional loving image of God as portrayed by most churches, people always either conclude that Christianity is total bullshit, or they conclude that God is truly loving and that the verses that describe him condeming people to eternal suffering come from - somewhere else. I have never heard of anyone in the last couple of centuries who has come to the conclusion that God exists, but is a brutal vindictive monster (plenty of biblical support for this) and is to be obeyed only out of fear if at all. Why do you suppose this is?
Because faith is largely about comfort. A brutal vindictive God who must be obeyed only out of fear is not comforting on any level. The truth is, the Bible does provide evidence of both a wrathful God and a loving one. If I denied that, I would be overlooking biblical scripture.

I can see how a wrathful God could condemn someone to Hell, but I can't see an infinitely loving God doing the same. That is, unless His definition of love is somehow different from ours.
Faith is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 03:35 PM   #73
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soul Invictus
One question. How does one justifiably do that which has been designated to not to be done?
I'm sorry, I don't understand the question.
Faith is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 03:38 PM   #74
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 361
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Soul Invictus
Welcome miata,

The problem stems from the fact that religion is so ingrained as a necessary and positive attribute of human life, that any negative or non-reinforcing criticism would naturally be met with resistance. Imagine someone saying your mom wasn't as good as you thought, or that she was harmful. When contended with valid, if not superior arguments (evidence) to support the non-alignment, this leaves the religious person often in a state of confusion. One that their 'truth' might not be as true as perceived, two, that someone would have the gall to critique God/God's word, and three, the frustration to not be adequately competent to address the issues, and fourth, a normal animalistic response of attacking or warding off the 'perceived' threat the best way one knows how, hence the ad hominems amd assortment of uncivil, unwarranted, and negative discourse procedures.
I agree, and I have learned some valuable lessons here. I have abandoned labels and I was wrong to not have been more sensitive in this area. I appreciate your feed back and I find it very positive. I want to understand as much as possible as I have a son age 12 who is confused by inlaws who want him to be religious. I am more a student here than a radical with profound ideas. I will be the first to admit I do not have the answers other than I am not religious or think we are influenced by any supernatural power.

If I have labeled or insulted it is not my intention and let me say I am sorry if I have been unkind. As far as confusion goes I must keep focused to avoid confusion but life is very abstract to me.

This is the only web that has been tolerant to me so I am trying to listen more and talk less. I have no atheist friends and my theist friends are all praying for my lost soul. I appreciate their concern but I am not convinced.

Again I appreciate your feed back.
miata is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 03:40 PM   #75
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Space Chef
Which is what appears to be happening in this thread.
I would hardly characterize the discussion so far as Faith having been "attacked" for her beliefs (assuming Faith is female). Yes, some of the beliefs Faith has graciously shared have been criticized, but that's, well, pretty much status quo around here, no? One can't reasonably expect a poster to share their beliefs on a discussion board without opening them to fair criticism, can you? And I, for one, have had no intent of attacking Faith for her beliefs. She's posted some beliefs, I've criticized some of them, and she's responded. It's all been quite civil, IMO. A reasonable discussion, which Faith is open to.

Quote:
Mods? Can we get a warning in here? I haven't read every single post in the thread, but the ones I have seem to be getting a little too... you know...
If you have particular posts in mind, the proper action is to report the posts to a moderator (using the little "!" in a red triangle at the bottom left of each post, if you don't already know that).
Mageth is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 03:43 PM   #76
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 957
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Faith
Because faith is largely about comfort. A brutal vindictive God who must be obeyed only out of fear is not comforting on any level. The truth is, the Bible does provide evidence of both a wrathful God and a loving one. If I denied that, I would be overlooking biblical scripture.
Yup. Faith has a lot to do with comfort - and as I'm sure I don't need to tell you, very little to do with objective reality. So anyone who operates on faith would believe what they believe because it is comfortable, and not because it is true. So, given that you know this, my next question is: do you actually believe any of the conclusions you reach on faith?
Jinto is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 03:50 PM   #77
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Faith
Because faith is largely about comfort. A brutal vindictive God who must be obeyed only out of fear is not comforting on any level. The truth is, the Bible does provide evidence of both a wrathful God and a loving one. If I denied that, I would be overlooking biblical scripture.

I can see how a wrathful God could condemn someone to Hell, but I can't see an infinitely loving God doing the same. That is, unless His definition of love is somehow different from ours.
Your candor is quite refreshing, Faith. Hopefully, you don't see anything that's been said on this thread as having been an "attack on your beliefs." As I stated above, my intent is not to attack your beliefs.

And trust me, I can identify with your position. I was there four years ago. But in my case, the cognitive dissonance that resulted from the conflict between the wrathful God and the loving God finally shook down the last vestiges of "faith" (other things contributed, of course). And my identity with your position is in large part what has led me to post the things I have on this thread; I sincerely believe you may benefit from the perspective of someone who's been there. No offense intended; I respect your beliefs, your faith, and the quandary that the Scripture, read at face value, puts you in.
Mageth is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 03:52 PM   #78
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 361
Default

Ahh... someone who gets it. Normally when Christians say "no, I don't believe that a loving God would torture people forever in hell, hell is merely the absence of God, which is what you wanted." they are quick to follow it up with "but the absence of God is still very very horrible and you need to be saved from the consequences of sin and please don't notice that I'm trying to use Pascal's Wager on you." You, on the other hand, have a lot more sense than to make that argument. Congratulations on actually thinking about what you believe.

Jinto, Your above thoughts are right on target. I enjoy your post.
Miata
miata is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 04:43 PM   #79
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NC
Posts: 361
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Space Chef
Which is what appears to be happening in this thread. Mods? Can we get a warning in here? I haven't read every single post in the thread, but the ones I have seem to be getting a little too... you know...
I don't know; someone help me. Getting a little too what?. I have been on tip toes and egg shells as I want to understand how we differ.
I contacted the moderator to ask what is wrong.

Space Chef, I appreciate your post so i can find out what is wrong. I am new here but I am not sure who is over the top. This is most laid back group I have met on line. I missed something??
Miata

SORRY I did not mean to over post!!!
miata is offline  
Old 06-02-2004, 05:26 PM   #80
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jinto
Yup. Faith has a lot to do with comfort - and as I'm sure I don't need to tell you, very little to do with objective reality. So anyone who operates on faith would believe what they believe because it is comfortable, and not because it is true. So, given that you know this, my next question is: do you actually believe any of the conclusions you reach on faith?
Faith is, by definition, a strong conviction in the unproven. My faith is based not only on what is comfortable to me but also on what I firmly believe to be true. That said, I do believe all the conclusions I have reached on faith: God exists. He created and is sovereign over all things. Jesus Christ walked the earth as a human being, was God incarnate, and will return one day. We can know God through His Son. We will all be judged fairly based on our beliefs and either spend eternity with God or apart from Him depending on the choices we make in life.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mageth
Your candor is quite refreshing, Faith. Hopefully, you don't see anything that's been said on this thread as having been an "attack on your beliefs." As I stated above, my intent is not to attack your beliefs.
I have not perceived anyone's comments as an attack on me or my beliefs. All in all, the discussion has been very civil.
Faith is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:58 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.