![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#11 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 346
|
![]() Quote:
? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 346
|
![]()
Sowwy.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: A city in Florida that I love
Posts: 3,416
|
![]() Quote:
I don't know about Albert, but I have no problem saying that I do reject unicorns, and for reasons of conformity. There's not always anything wrong with doing or believing things for that reason. Doesn't mean it's the most compelling reason in the world though. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,018
|
![]() Quote:
I hold up to ridicule anyone’s wrong reasons, not their wrong conclusions. It’s actually possible to have good reasons for wrong conclusions, such as a belief in unicorns. But it’s positively impossible to be a good person while employing non-rational non-reasons to hold to correct conclusions. – Sincerely, Albert Cipriani the Traditional Catholic |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Mesa, AZ
USA
Posts: 583
|
![]() Quote:
~Justin |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,018
|
![]() Quote:
Pascal was a Jansenist Christian, not an orthodox Catholic. He subscribed to that heresy which the Church roundly condemned. Ergo, it should be no surprise that this smart man whom I respect could come up with his theologically stupid wager. -- Sincerely, Albert Cipriani the Traditional Catholic |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 346
|
![]() Quote:
Do you believe in unicorns? Why or why not? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | ||||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mohave Desert
Posts: 2,174
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Take a look at your statement, and be honest with yourself for one moment. In one sentence you declare that God is mysterious, while claiming that a person's rejection of this mysterious being is itself mysterious. Albert, I know that you cannot possibly comprehend Apollo, because he is far too mysterious. But your rejection of him is a mystery. Quote:
I highly doubt that everyone accepted the existence of unicorns 500 years ago, but that's beside the point. What bothers me is the dishonesty, which really rears its ugly head in the following statement: Quote:
The herd instinct is what makes religions thrive. Christianity survives not because of the veracity of its scriptures or its doctrines, but because of sheer numbers. Quote:
You realize that you're adopting the tactics of the TAGists? You realize that every theist will be using these same absurd inversions as arguments: that atheists are the ones with blind faith, which is argued in spite of the fact that faith is recognized as a cardinal virtue by Christians; that atheists represent the common herd, which is proposed in light of the brute fact that believers greatly outnumber non-believers; that the non-believer's rejection of God is a mystery, in light of every theist's proud declaration that God is a mystery and cannot be understood. Ridiculous. |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
|
![]() Quote:
Too bad this humor is wasted on Al. He'll simply take what you say verbatim and assume you started smoking. |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|