FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-20-2010, 11:22 AM   #1
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default mountainman's "pagan polemic" theory of the origin of the noncanonical gospels

Whenever I enter a google search on a few key terms in Pete's neverending quest to prove his theories, I find that Pete has started threads or discussion topics all over the internet, and is uniformly unsuccessful in finding any support.

This usenet from alt.soc.history.ancient has a fairly complete exposition, which I will note here for future reference.

http://groups.google.com/group/soc.h...16a6eca2?pli=1
Toto is offline  
Old 11-20-2010, 12:33 PM   #2
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Whenever I enter a google search on a few key terms in Pete's neverending quest to prove his theories, I find that Pete has started threads or discussion topics all over the internet, and is uniformly unsuccessful in finding any support.

This usenet from alt.soc.history.ancient has a fairly complete exposition, which I will note here for future reference.

http://groups.google.com/group/soc.h...16a6eca2?pli=1
Isn't this a little bit personal now?
What is it with people here and their hatred of Pete?
I do not subscribe to his theory but I think he is being victimized now - seems like personal vendettas.
How about letting it drop.
Transient is offline  
Old 11-20-2010, 12:36 PM   #3
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

There's no hatred. I just want to clear the air of invalid claims that keep popping up.
Toto is offline  
Old 11-20-2010, 01:24 PM   #4
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
There's no hatred. I just want to clear the air of invalid claims that keep popping up.
But, this happened two and a half years ago. Based on the dates of the posts this argument happened sometime in March 2008. It certainly did NOT just POP up.

I could also claim that HJers are hopelessly trying to convince people that Jesus was just a man all over the internet when they have ZERO CREDIBLE historical evidence.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 11-20-2010, 02:55 PM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

I am the furthest thing from a bully but I find myself in agreement with Toto. When someone like gracedwithlife (or whatever the name is) no one has a problem piling on. The reason is that gracedwithlife is a believer and believers are the bad guys.

If you notice however the intelligent apologists for organized Christianity never attack Pete's posts. The reason is simple - Pete gives sceptics a bad name, or from their point of view perfectly caricature the opposition
stephan huller is offline  
Old 11-20-2010, 03:18 PM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

I posted this because Pete is still repeating his claim that the best explanation of the evidence, or at least a viable explanation, is that the noncanonical gospels are post-Nicea pagan parodies.

This constant repetition amounts to preaching.
Toto is offline  
Old 11-20-2010, 04:11 PM   #7
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

I don't agree with mountainman's theory about the origin of the Jesus cult or religion but he has CONTINUOUSLY EXPOSED the fact that "Church History" and other writings under the name "Eusebius" are essentially FICTION and was KNOWN to be FICTION with respect to the history of Jesus and the Jesus cult or religion by the ROMAN CHURCH over 1500 years ago.

Now, if mountainman's is wrong it only means that the forgeries, interpolations and fraud occurred EARLIER than he thought. That is all.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 11-20-2010, 04:17 PM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

The idea that Eusebius is unreliable is not especially controversial, and hardly needs Pete's support.
Toto is offline  
Old 11-20-2010, 05:05 PM   #9
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
The idea that Eusebius is unreliable is not especially controversial, and hardly needs Pete's support.
What!!

There are BILLIONS of people who may not know that "Church History" by Eusebius even exists and that it is FICTION with respect to the history of Jesus and the Jesus cult.

I wish there were a lot more "mountainmen" out there. At least some people would get the message.

"Church History" is FICTION with respect to the history of Jesus and the Jesus cult.

If there was a "moutainman" in the 4th century perhaps we would not have "Church History" or Eusebius.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 11-20-2010, 05:08 PM   #10
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 412
Default

This thread is indefensible and should be deleted.
I find it offensive in the extreme.
It is an attempt to provoke Pete and as such demeans the quality of this board and brings it into disrepute.
Transient is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:22 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.