FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-02-2005, 12:09 AM   #1
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,280
Default How many Christians believe in Revelations?

I am asking this because while an atheist I can understand how most of the rest of the New Testament can be taken as sacred text by theists. But the book of Revelations is so disturbing and incoherent, I can't see why more xtian don't discount it outright.
repoman is offline  
Old 02-02-2005, 12:55 AM   #2
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton, England
Posts: 6,947
Default

I'm an atheist and I believe in Revelation.

It definitely exists - I can point it out to you in the back of a Bible if you want.

On a more serious note, if you read the book it is describing someone's vision.

Most Christians seem to believe that it was a truly inspired vision - but that that doesn't necessarily mean that the things depicted in it will actually happen. The vision is seen as metaphor or parable - designed to be instructive (if somewhat hard to glean meaning out of) rather than designed to be a "preview" of actual future events.

Of course, this is just what most Christians that I have encountered believe. If you go somewhere like Rapture Ready (a Christian forum specifically for Christians who believe that the events in Revelation are both real and about to happen any day now), then you will get a different Christian viewpoint.

I don't know if that kind of apocalyptic Christian is particularly common in America, but they are certainly rare over here in Europe.
Dean Anderson is offline  
Old 02-02-2005, 03:37 AM   #3
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rochdale, England
Posts: 138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by repoman
I am asking this because while an atheist I can understand how most of the rest of the New Testament can be taken as sacred text by theists. But the book of Revelations is so disturbing and incoherent, I can't see why more xtian don't discount it outright.
There are many Christians who believe it, but not all agree on the interpretation. For the first part it is seven letters to the main churches in the area, pretty straight forward - but then it gets all mystical. It does have a lot of tie-ins to Daniels revelation.

Most conservative and charismatic Christians believe in a literal end time with rapture and beast etc. whereas there are some that believe that most of the events have already taken place and that it was a coded warning to Christians about the Roman Empire and that danger was imminent.

I find a lot of Christians believe the interpretation sanctioned by their particular church, the churches I went to as a Christian believed in the beast and rapture a la Tim LaHey's "Left Behind" novels. My friends lapped that shit up and believed it would happen without question.
KenLynch is offline  
Old 02-02-2005, 03:40 AM   #4
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rochdale, England
Posts: 138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pervy
I'm an atheist and I believe in Revelation. I don't know if that kind of apocalyptic Christian is particularly common in America, but they are certainly rare over here in Europe.
What do you mean? I spent 15 years as a Christian and pretty much most of the Christians I met where apocalyptic, just go to your nearest Baptist or Charismatic church and you'll meet loads.
KenLynch is offline  
Old 02-02-2005, 04:01 AM   #5
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brighton, England
Posts: 6,947
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KenLynch
What do you mean? I spent 15 years as a Christian and pretty much most of the Christians I met where apocalyptic, just go to your nearest Baptist or Charismatic church and you'll meet loads.
Agreed.

But the vast majority of British Christians are not Baptist or Charismatic. They are Anglican or Catholic (or that peculiarly British breed of non-denominational apathetic go-to-church-at-christmas-and-forget-about-it-the-rest-of-the-year Christians). None of these are apocalyptic in outlook.

I said that apocalyptic Christians were rare in the UK, not non-existant. I went to a Charismatic church myself when I was a Christian - so I know they exist in the UK.
Dean Anderson is offline  
Old 02-02-2005, 01:11 PM   #6
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 24,524
Default

I think it is very likely that, as predicted, the Temple will be destroyed by Rome by the year 100AD or so. Possibly a little sooner.
seebs is offline  
Old 02-02-2005, 01:28 PM   #7
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Manitoba Canada
Posts: 343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by repoman
I am asking this because while an atheist I can understand how most of the rest of the New Testament can be taken as sacred text by theists. But the book of Revelations is so disturbing and incoherent, I can't see why more xtian don't discount it outright.


Here is a post I wrote for another thread which shows just how unreliable the author of the book of Revelations is.


I had been studying in the Old Testament for several weeks and I felt I needed a break in the routine. On the spur of the moment I flipped to the last book in the Bible. I had read through most of Revelations (And it appeared to me as if written by someone who had lost touch with reality) when on the last page near the end I came across a passage that I instantly associated with the book of Daniel ( which I believe it had been designed to do)

Revelations 22:10-11 “ Then he said to me, do not seal up the words of the prophecy of this book, because the time is near. Let him who does wrong continue to do wrong, let him who is vile continue to be vile, let him who does right continue to do right, and let him who is holy continue to be holy�?

On the face of it these passages seem to indicate that the end is so immanent that any further attempts at spreading the gospel should be halted and preparation made for ones personal meeting with Jesus. And directly following these passages we have the text declaring in Jesus’s own words the imminence of his return.

Revelations 22:7 " Behold I am coming soon! Blessed is he that keeps the words of the prophecy in this book."

But if one is to combine these passages with the passages from the book of Daniel which they seem deliberately designed to do, Then the original readers of this book would have been completely justified in expecting Jesus within a very short time period.

Daniel 12:2-4 “But at that time your people, everyone whose name is written in the Book will be delivered. Multitudes who sleep in the dust of the earth will awake, some to everlasting life others to shame and everlasting contempt. Those who are wise will shine like the brightness of the heavens, and those who lead many to righteousness, like the stars forever and ever.

But you Daniel, close up and seal the words of the scroll until the time of the end�?

That is the verse that anyone familiar with the book of Daniel would instantly have associated to the verse in Revelations “ Do not seal up the words of the prophecy of this book because the end is near�?

If the message had not been clear enough before, the association with the verse in Daniel would surely have indicated to the readers of Revelation that they were to understand that the author intended for them to believe that the second coming was more than immanent it was almost immediate.

If the author of Revelation was so flawed in his interpretation of something as crucial as the second coming how can anyone be sure of any prophecy contained in the book.
johntheapostate is offline  
Old 02-02-2005, 02:31 PM   #8
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: North West usa
Posts: 10,245
Default

Martin Luther did not believe that it belonged in the canon as well.

A good portion of modern Liberal Xians put little stock in this book, but then they also tend to put little thought into much of any theology that I can tell.
funinspace is offline  
Old 02-02-2005, 05:07 PM   #9
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Big State in the South
Posts: 448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by seebs
I think it is very likely that, as predicted, the Temple will be destroyed by Rome by the year 100AD or so. Possibly a little sooner.
Boomeister is offline  
Old 02-02-2005, 05:44 PM   #10
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: the balls of the cock that's FXXXing the world
Posts: 264
Default

As a pre-teen cATHOLIC , I found ridiculous SHIT to be ridiculous SHIT. In 8th grade I declined to participate in getting stars thru community service and thereby boeing out of Confirmation. My 'rents continued to send me for indoctrination but to no avail. BS is BS
felicitouslut is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:15 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.