FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-03-2012, 09:59 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Can we see proof of this?
You're the one making the assertion
You're the one making the assertion for which proof has been requested.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 01-03-2012, 10:23 AM   #22
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: MT
Posts: 10,656
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post

If they do, which I tend to doubt, it is only because they were raised in a Christian country, not because they brought their professional skills to bear on the question.
Can we see proof of this?
It is a claim made plausible through analogy--by far most Quranic scholars accept the Quran as revelation from God, and they likewise belong to societies of the same religion.
ApostateAbe is offline  
Old 01-03-2012, 10:27 AM   #23
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post

You're the one making the assertion
You're the one making the assertion for which proof has been requested.
I know how lawyers and police investigate factual matters and the standards of proof, and use of those techniques does not lead anyone to accept the Bible.

And your "proof"?
Toto is offline  
Old 01-03-2012, 10:40 AM   #24
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ApostateAbe View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Can we see proof of this?
It is a claim made plausible
All sorts of things are plausible that are totally untrue.

Quote:
through analogy--by far most Quranic scholars accept the Quran as revelation from God
They probably wouldn't be Qur'anic scholars if they did not! Circularity comes round.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 01-03-2012, 10:44 AM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post

You're the one making the assertion for which proof has been requested.
I know how lawyers and police investigate factual matters and the standards of proof, and use of those techniques does not lead anyone to accept the Bible.
That's not proof. It's merely re-statement of the assertion.
sotto voce is offline  
Old 01-03-2012, 11:19 AM   #26
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toto View Post

I know how lawyers and police investigate factual matters and the standards of proof, and use of those techniques does not lead anyone to accept the Bible.
That's not proof. It's merely re-statement of the assertion.
What kind of a game is this?

It is self evident, based on my background knowledge of how things work.

You, on the other hand, made a statement with no support of any sort, either in logic or statistical surveys, that lawyers and police officers and judges "accept the Bible as worthy testimony." And you added a smilie, as if this proved anything.

Where is your proof?

And don't cut out half of my reply.
Toto is offline  
Old 01-03-2012, 11:27 AM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minnesota, the least controversial state in the le
Posts: 8,446
Default

Type in "Compartamentalizing faith" into google and see what you get. You'll get dozens of links to christian websites railing against how people separate their faith from their daily lives.

The fact that you pretend to be unaware of this phenomenon is again very telling. Truly, religious people will say whatever they have to say to support their arguments, and think nothing of saying the opposite when it suits them. Indeed, this is a hallmark of the compartamentalization process.

Everyone knows that people have different standards for their faith and everything else. Imagine if you formed your opinions on medicine on information as flimsey as your religion has!
Sarpedon is offline  
Old 01-03-2012, 12:52 PM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,014
Default

Hi sotto voce,

Here is the text in question:

Quote:
1Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem, 2Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen his star in the east, and are come to worship him. 3When Herod the king had heard these things, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him. 4And when he had gathered all the chief priests and scribes of the people together, he demanded of them where Christ should be born. 5And they said unto him, In Bethlehem of Judaea: for thus it is written by the prophet,

6And thou Bethlehem, in the land of Juda, art not the least among the princes of Juda: for out of thee shall come a Governor, that shall rule my people Israel.

7Then Herod, when he had privily called the wise men, inquired of them diligently what time the star appeared. 8And he sent them to Bethlehem, and said, Go and search diligently for the young child; and when ye have found him, bring me word again, that I may come and worship him also. 9When they had heard the king, they departed; and, lo, the star, which they saw in the east, went before them, till it came and stood over where the young child was. 10When they saw the star, they rejoiced with exceeding great joy. 11And when they were come into the house
The text tells us that the wise men were from the East and they saw a star in the East that for some reason they took to be a sign that a new king had been born in Jerusalem.

The connection of earthly humanly events like births with the position of astral objects is astrology. We now know that astrology is a pseudo science. There is no connection between the discovery of stars and the future political position of human beings being born on Earth. The writer clearly believes in astrology as he labels the three believers in astrology as "wise men."

There is no indication that the three wise men were following the star when they went to Jerusalem. In fact, the text suggests that they were surprised to find the star when they were leaving for Jerusalem - "they departed; and, lo, the star, which they saw in the east, went before them."
The phrase "and, lo" indicates that they were surprised to see the star again "which they saw in the east." The repetition of "which they saw in the east" indicates they had only seen it before in the Eastern sky.

If we assume that they had been following the star, we must assume that they had gone East and circumnavigated the Earth.

Bethlehem is about 8 kilometers/5 miles from Jerusalem. It was perhaps a two hour walk. Since, they had been told that the king was supposed to be born in Bethlehem, they were not following the star to get to Bethlehem. There is no indication in the text that the wise men ever used the star for directional purposes to find Bethlehem. It was totally unnecessary, as the frequently traveled road would have been clearly marked. Rather, the text indicates that the star led them to the specific house of the new born King. Further stars move from East to West, they cannot lead people from South (Jerusalem) to North (Bethlehem).

From the phrase, "went before them," we can be reasonably certain that the writer meant that the star had come down from the sky and was traveling a few feet, or perhaps like a bird, several hundred feet off the ground. In the natural world, stars do not come down to Earth and travel in front of people. They are distant suns that would cause the destruction of the Earth if they even came near the solar system. The writer, as all people of that time, did not know this, and gave this star the property of being able to go above a single house, like an Xmas tree ornament. It represents a cartoon version of reality. Just as the laws of nature do not apply in cartoons, they do not apply for the writers of this text.

Warmly,

Jay Raskin





Another Image of the Three Wise Men from one of their movies


Quote:
Originally Posted by sotto voce View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilosopherJay View Post
Matthew 2:1-2 is geographically amusing.

1Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, magi from the east arrived in Jerusalem, saying, 2“Where is He who has been born King of the Jews? For we saw His star in the east and have come to worship Him.”

If you're East of some place and you follow a star in the East, you're going to end up further East than when you started.
It was the magi who were in the east when they saw the 'star', that they subsequently followed, over them. "We saw his star rising, when we were in the east."
PhilosopherJay is offline  
Old 01-03-2012, 12:58 PM   #29
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Conowingo, Maryland
Posts: 577
Default

Hey guys, thanks for the help in research! I found some great evidence (thanks to you) and will be posting the link to the debate if I'm allowed.
DoubtingDave is offline  
Old 01-03-2012, 01:12 PM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilosopherJay View Post
Hi sotto voce,

Here is the text in question
Hi,

The text in question, conservatively and accurately translated, is here:

'Magi came from the East to Jerusalem and asked, "Where is the one born king of the Jews? We saw his star rising, and have come to worship him."' Mt 2:1-2

This does not seem to present any problems.
sotto voce is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:28 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.