FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Non Abrahamic Religions & Philosophies
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-07-2005, 11:51 PM   #41
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,023
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamMoose
Okay, I have a question. I would like, sometimes, for there to be a God but whenever I think about it, it seems to me to be logically impossible for a number of reasons.

Our even being here (existing) and being able to do the things we can do seems logically impossible to me when you really think about it, yet here we are.
itsamysteryhuh is offline  
Old 02-08-2005, 07:21 AM   #42
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by itsamysteryhuh
Our even being here (existing) and being able to do the things we can do seems logically impossible to me when you really think about it, yet here we are.
Really?

How?
radagast is offline  
Old 02-08-2005, 05:25 PM   #43
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,023
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by radagast
Really?

How?

1. Yes.
2. When you REALLY think about it.
itsamysteryhuh is offline  
Old 02-09-2005, 07:30 AM   #44
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by itsamysteryhuh
1. Yes.
2. When you REALLY think about it.
I will assume that wasn't meant as the insult it appears.

Given I've spent 50 years thinking about it, that I discuss religion/philosophy with every religious person that comes to the front door, that I have the majority of major religious books in my library, having read all or a goodly portion of all of them, and have a fairly good scientific education, yes I do have to say I've given it some thought.

Since you seem to have ignored the HOW portion, I will make that more explicit:

Perhaps you would give your reasons.

If there are assumptions made, such as that universal constants were chosen by chance, please state these specifically. If you with to use statistics such that you compare a mechanism with a statistical probability with one that doesn't, please make that explicit, i.e. like in school, show your work...

Regards,
Glenn
radagast is offline  
Old 02-09-2005, 10:34 AM   #45
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: On the fringes of the Lake District, UK
Posts: 9,528
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by itsamysteryhuh
Our even being here (existing) and being able to do the things we can do seems logically impossible to me when you really think about it, yet here we are.
Well then, it's not logically impossible not even improbable, really!
IamMoose is offline  
Old 02-09-2005, 01:31 PM   #46
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,952
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by llamaluvr
I hope that gives you some idea of what it's like in my shoes. Christianity affects my entire life, so there's a lot more areas where my faith is relevant than that, but that's all I can really type for now. I gotta get up and exercise or something! :- )

(PS: I got a lot of work this weekend, so I might not get back to this thread (or any other in IIDB, for that matter) until Monday or so...have a good weekend!)
I read the whole thing, I didn't want to post your whole quote again..but

I gotta tell you, that was impressive.
Its easy to see God is acting in you.

"When man listens, God speaks.
When man obeys, God acts".
jonesg is offline  
Old 02-09-2005, 01:53 PM   #47
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,952
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rational BAC
Most of the Canon is politically influenced crapola dating from the 4th century---not the 1st century.
In 1938, there was a meeting attended by Bill Wilson (the founder of AA) and Mr Rockerfeller (yes, THE Rockerfeller).
Rockerfeller declared, after reading the manuscript of alcoholics annonymous "Why this is first century Christianity".
He decided to bankroll the publication of what has become one of the biggest spiritual movements ever after Christianity.

Now to the point,
Christianity, it seems, only really works when the 1st century version of it is embraced. AA certainly works and I have experienced and seen many a miracle there. Before that, I didn't think there was any God, I thought it was a myth concocted for self preservation.
As often happens, the opposite was true, my atheism was only good at preserving SELF and self never wanted anything good in my life.

Many a priest and nun has ended up at AA's doors and learned how to really pray, without Pride. I find God within, not in stained glass but I see his work and words everywhere as those who Obey Him bring His Will into manifestation.
jonesg is offline  
Old 02-10-2005, 06:29 AM   #48
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonesg
Now to the point,
Christianity, it seems, only really works when the 1st century version of it is embraced. AA certainly works and I have experienced and seen many a miracle there. Before that, I didn't think there was any God, I thought it was a myth concocted for self preservation.
As often happens, the opposite was true, my atheism was only good at preserving SELF and self never wanted anything good in my life.
I am happy AA worked for you. I have a good friend it also worked for, though she was and remains an atheist, the religious aspect was more an impediment than a help for her.

While your atheism was entirely self centered doesn't mean that's the case with others. A large segment of the Buddhist population has no belief in a god or gods, yet is not self-centered.

I am glad your religious beliefs work for you. I just want to be careful that we make a serious distinction between something that was personal to you (self-centeredness) and all atheists. If you believe this is a atheist characteristic, then that should be expressed explicitly, and it will be something I will contest. If this was just personal, then I can understand your statements in that context.

Glenn
radagast is offline  
Old 02-12-2005, 06:51 AM   #49
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: On the fringes of the Lake District, UK
Posts: 9,528
Default

I was surprised and rather dismayed when I learned - not from personal experience but whilst reading on the net - that AA has religious aspects to it. i don't know if those are followed in this country, but I do know that, if I ever had need of it, the idea that it is a theistic concept and programme would rather put me off.
IamMoose is offline  
Old 02-12-2005, 06:54 AM   #50
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: On the fringes of the Lake District, UK
Posts: 9,528
Default

Re statistics, I've always thought that using stats to prove or disprove anything is a risky business, and when it comes to religion it's a downright foolish business. I've heard too many Chrisitans say 'the world couldn't have come about by chance, the odds against it are (insert huge and meaningless number here) to one'. That's irrelevant. The second something happens, it doesn't matter what the odds against it were. It's happened, and that's that. I could never become convinced that there was a God using arguments like that (actually can't think of any arguments that would convince me but that's another story).
IamMoose is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:05 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.