![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: none
Posts: 9,879
|
![]()
OK, I've heard both arguments for "became" and "was" - which is it?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rochdale, England
Posts: 138
|
![]()
Well the NIV hedges its bets by having "was" in the main verse and "Or possibly became" as a footnote.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: greater Orlando area
Posts: 832
|
![]()
This is because the "was" is relative. It probably means "was [at the time that Elohim's spirit hovered over the waters]."
Regards, CJD |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 11,885
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|