![]()  | 
	
		Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#11 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2004 
				Location: London, UK 
				
				
					Posts: 3,210
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#12 | 
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jul 2003 
				Location: Colorado 
				
				
					Posts: 8,674
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			I was wanting to stay focues on Christianity here, but I would say in every case of "Communist" revolution they did, in one degree or another, come to power, though new underclasses formed of course, after the fact, and not every member of the underclass came to power, but clearly they exerted influnence in ways they never did before, much of that influence being "negative".  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Pretty much all of the killing that was assocaited with Communist reovlutions was done by the public. It ws a democratic process, it wasn't directed from above, it was allowed from above to go on, it was largely vigilante.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#13 | 
| 
			
			 Senior Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Sep 2006 
				Location: North Texas 
				
				
					Posts: 766
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Seems the nobility in Europe during the "Dark Ages" quickly learned to use Christianity and the Catholic Church as a handy tool to keep their serfs (slaves) under their thumbs. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	"Yes my children your lives are hard and miserable, but if you remain good , your rewards will come when you get to heaven"  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#14 | 
| 
			
			 Banned 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2006 
				Location: Palm Springs, California 
				
				
					Posts: 10,955
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Interesting post, Malachi.  It is consistent with Jesus' message of "liberation" and "freedom", as well as Paul's. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	I think Christianity helped put an end to the various oppression institutionis of classic paganism, and set the stage for the Enlightenment.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#15 | 
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Feb 2006 
				Location: the fringe of the caribbean 
				
				
					Posts: 18,988
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Slavery and exploitation was sanctioned by Christianity. Haven't you heard of the Slave Trade and the Christians who owned slaves?
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#16 | |
| 
			
			 Contributor 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jul 2001 
				Location: Florida 
				
				
					Posts: 15,796
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 Jesus definitely sides with the poor. But as I read it, he almost suggests that poverty is a necessary precondition for virtue. The rich and the powerful are going to have a rough time entering the Kingdom of Heaven. And the Kingdom of Heaven is something that can be attained during our lifetimes. We don't have to die to achieve it. The attitude toward poverty seems to me to be much closer to the Buddha or to Gandhi than to Marx.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#17 | |
| 
			
			 Banned 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Apr 2006 
				Location: Palm Springs, California 
				
				
					Posts: 10,955
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 You've confused various institutions that purported to be Christian and Christianity. A common mistake. In fact it was radical Christians (like John Brown) who were central in the abolitionist movement.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| 
			
			 | 
		#18 | |
| 
			
			 Veteran Member 
			
			
			
			Join Date: Jul 2003 
				Location: Colorado 
				
				
					Posts: 8,674
				 
				
				
				
				
				 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 Quote: 
	
 The abolitionist movement started in the 1600s with Humanists. The first loud voices for abolition came from French atheists and people like Thomas Paine. John Brown was a minority figure whose views were well outside the mainstream, and I'm not sure I'd even consider him a good person considering his rampages, etc., and his views. Plus, all of this is irrelevent anyway since I am discussing ancient Christianity, i.e. the first 300-400 years.  | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | 
		
  |