FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-27-2005, 06:04 PM   #131
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Essex, England
Posts: 608
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenn6162
Well I said I don't attend church I never said I don't participate in online forums, discussions, Bible studies.
Ah, but that's not quite the same is it? Without actually getting properly involved in a church you aren't able to share your spiritual gifts that the Bible insists on.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenn6162
You all definately know a lot more than I expected. As I said earlier, ignorant me. Would love to hear how and why you deconverted, although I suspect it is because of all those supposed inaccuracies.
Inaccuracies were only a minor thing to me. If you really are interested and you have the time, you're welcome to read the full story here:
http://www.ezkeel.com/Life/Paradox.htm

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenn6162
Please share more of your knowledge, whenever you are bored.
I'm rarely bored, but even though I no longer believe, I still find the subject interesting and like talking about it. Again, the majority of what I learned about that particular subject I put here:
http://www.ezkeel.com/Theology/Escha...schatology.htm
I guess I should shut up now as I've dragged this off topic!
Have fun.
Paradox is offline  
Old 07-27-2005, 06:19 PM   #132
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 517
Default

Thanks Paradox,
I am looking forward to reading.
Jenn6162 is offline  
Old 07-27-2005, 10:47 PM   #133
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Lansing, Michigan
Posts: 4,243
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by badger3k
That's not answering the question. How can you say you believe in the literal interpretation when you don't?
A literal interpretation is not always warrented and I don't think Jenn takes EVERYthing literally. I don't think she thinks Jesus will have a sword in his mouth. Each metaphor in the bible as it relates to reality is true. I think what she means is that the bible is word for word inspired by God. Not that every passage should be taken literally.
buckshot23 is offline  
Old 07-28-2005, 02:42 AM   #134
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

This is the world, according to the Bible's authors:


(From the New American Bible, St. Joseph edition)

This is what numerous Bible verses, from Genesis to Revelation, are talking about. It's described in detail in the Book of Enoch: now considered non-canonical and excluded from the Bible (probably out of embarrassment), but Enoch is endorsed as a "true prophet" by Jude, whose own book IS still in the Bible.

So this is the world that a "Biblical inerrantist" should believe in.
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 07-28-2005, 06:59 AM   #135
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 517
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack the Bodiless
This is the world, according to the Bible's authors:


(From the New American Bible, St. Joseph edition)

This is what numerous Bible verses, from Genesis to Revelation, are talking about. It's described in detail in the Book of Enoch: now considered non-canonical and excluded from the Bible (probably out of embarrassment), but Enoch is endorsed as a "true prophet" by Jude, whose own book IS still in the Bible.

So this is the world that a "Biblical inerrantist" should believe in.

This does not make the message of the Bible any less true. I don't know enough about this illustration to make any comment.
Jenn6162 is offline  
Old 07-28-2005, 07:39 AM   #136
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 517
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paradox
I'm rarely bored, but even though I no longer believe, I still find the subject interesting and like talking about it. Again, the majority of what I learned about that particular subject I put here:
http://www.ezkeel.com/Theology/Escha...schatology.htm
I guess I should shut up now as I've dragged this off topic!
Have fun.
I am curious since you are no longer a believer, how do you reason the fact that so many of the prophecies have come to pass? Specifically that relate to Israel. That they would be scattered, come back, and that the earth would be cultivated when before they came back there was only desert. I could find the prophecies if you would like to discuss. I read about this the other day, and it was a very interesting read.
Jenn6162 is offline  
Old 07-28-2005, 08:40 AM   #137
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenn6162
I am curious since you are no longer a believer, how do you reason the fact that so many of the prophecies have come to pass? Specifically that relate to Israel. That they would be scattered, come back, and that the earth would be cultivated when before they came back there was only desert. I could find the prophecies if you would like to discuss. I read about this the other day, and it was a very interesting read.
Yes, please do.

I only ask that the prophecies be clear and unambiguous. They must specify Israel, they must give some sort of time frame for the events, they must be referring to a "desert," a barren place of sand dunes. Othewise they are no better than the prophecies of Nostradamus which can be squeezed to predict anything.
John A. Broussard is offline  
Old 07-28-2005, 08:41 AM   #138
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenn6162
This does not make the message of the Bible any less true. I don't know enough about this illustration to make any comment.
Right. The map simply shows the world as it was then. God, through a miracle, has now shifted to round earth that moves around the sun.
John A. Broussard is offline  
Old 07-28-2005, 08:43 AM   #139
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 6,629
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by buckshot23
A literal interpretation is not always warrented and I don't think Jenn takes EVERYthing literally. I don't think she thinks Jesus will have a sword in his mouth. Each metaphor in the bible as it relates to reality is true. I think what she means is that the bible is word for word inspired by God. Not that every passage should be taken literally.
What criteria do you use to determine which verses must be taken literally and which are simply figurative?

Thank you.
John A. Broussard is offline  
Old 07-28-2005, 08:52 AM   #140
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Lansing, Michigan
Posts: 4,243
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John A. Broussard
What criteria do you use to determine which verses must be taken literally and which are simply figurative?

Thank you.
By reading. Some are obvious. Like Jesus having a sword coming out of his mouth. Some aren't as obvious. Common sense basically.
buckshot23 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:30 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.