FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-05-2004, 03:21 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
Posts: 748
Default

Is there any evidence outside the gospels and Acts that the apostles even existed, at least as portrayed in those works?

When Peter and the rest are mentioned in the epistles, are they ever shown as being men who actually "walked with Jesus"?

I think the very premise of this thread is potentially faulty since it assumes that the gospels were based on factual events.
Roland is offline  
Old 02-05-2004, 11:32 PM   #12
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 9,159
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Roland
Is there any evidence outside the gospels and Acts that the apostles even existed, at least as portrayed in those works?

When Peter and the rest are mentioned in the epistles, are they ever shown as being men who actually "walked with Jesus"?

I think the very premise of this thread is potentially faulty since it assumes that the gospels were based on factual events.
As far as extra-Biblical stuff goes, it is also nearly zero. All roads lead to Josephus and there's the lonely James reference in there. Such a tenuous anchor to secure anything. I started a thread on Peter once and another one on Paul - and the upshot was that we basically have no concrete external evidence.
rlogan is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 01:17 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Mike(ATL)
Am I correct in understanding that to dismiss the martyr's death of the apostles we must believe that the apostles were either brilliant in their forgery of history or were psychotic enough to die for a cause they knew to be unfounded?
Why didn't they just explain to Nero that they did NOT set fire to Rome, and they would not have been martyred?

I wonder why all those people in 1930 Soviet show trials confessed to being guilty. Were they psychotic?



There are lots of reasons why somebody would volunteer for death in 1st century Judea, for a cause he knew to be untrue. If Jewish Christians thought Jerusalem would be destroyed by the Romans unless Jews repented or converted, they might well invent a white lie and then be prepared to die for it to try to save their country.
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 01:24 AM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Mike(ATL)
Do you have a particular example where someone was said to be martyred when we know for a fact they were not? In this instance was the record of their being martyred recorded so soon to the said time of death?
Goalposts - to the left, quick march! Now sceptics have to produce evidence of the natural deaths of the apostles, when there is hardly any evidence that they existed.

Do you have any documentary evidence close to the said time of death of ,eg, the death of Thomas?

BTW, why would Muslims have volunteered to die in Muhammad's cause (eg at the Battle of the Trench in 627 AD), if they KNEW that Muhammad had not been visited by Gabriel?
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 01:27 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: England
Posts: 5,629
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by The Evil One

- B is false and X died for it despite knowing it was false.
(the absurdity of the second option is used by some as evidence that the first is correct. But, lookee here, lots more options! And none of these tell us anything about whether B is true or false)
Why is that option absurd? I don't see it myself.

Why did Jim Jones kill himself, when he knew that all he had been preaching was false?
Steven Carr is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 02:14 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 5,815
Default

...Ah, but did he know that it was false?

The same applies to the Heaven's Gate cultists. There was no concrete evidence that a spacecraft was NOT hiding in the Hale-Bopp comet.

Many people who invent religions probably believe them to be true, because they "sense" this. However, this becomes increasingly unlikely as the number of miraculous events they claim to have witnessed increases.

Of course, this expands the number of "they believed it" possibilities. Did they believe it without evidence, or because they convinced themselves that they had witnessed one miracle, or two miracles, or three... or did they actually follow Jesus around and believe they had witnessed every miracle mentioned in the gospels?
Jack the Bodiless is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 05:07 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 590
Default

In the same vein I would ask the question, Was David Koresh a martyr to his lies or a victim of a delusion?
He used his assertions of Godly appointment to rape his followers literally and mentally.
He ripped them off financially, he raped their children, stole their wives, dominated their minds and finally led them to their deaths.
Was he a martyr or just a monster?
Can we extrapolate what we learn from Koresh to help in our understanding of other apocalyptic cultists?
Baidarka is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 05:40 AM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 713
Default

The martyrdom of the apostles could simply be an example of making the story more exciting. Heros should die heroic deaths. Simon Peter was crucified upside down sounds a lot more heroic than Simon Peter got drunk, fell off the fishing boat, and drowned, or Simon Peter died of cholera.
Dargo is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 01:26 PM   #19
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

There is also strong indication from early Christian writings that martyrdom (thus emulating Christ's death) was seen by some early Christians as a quick and sure (perhaps the only sure) way into Heaven, and even as a way to "grow the church". Some early Gnostic Christians saw this tendency to accept martyrdom as, well, rather foolish and pointless.

See The Gnostic Gospels, by Elaine Pagels, for more information. You can read a good review of the book here.
Mageth is offline  
Old 02-06-2004, 01:31 PM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Eagle River, Alaska
Posts: 7,816
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Mageth
There is also strong indication from early Christian writings that martyrdom (thus emulating Christ's death) was seen by some early Christians as a quick and sure (perhaps the only sure) way into Heaven, and even as a way to "grow the church".
Ignatius certainly embraced the idea of his approaching martyrdom:

"For, on hearing that I came bound from Syria for the common name and hope, trusting through your prayers to be permitted to fight with beasts at Rome, that so by martyrdom I may indeed become the disciple of Him "who gave Himself for us, an offering and sacrifice to God,"[ye hastened to see me]. (Letter to the Ephesians, 1, Kirby's CD/website)
Amaleq13 is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:03 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.