FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > Religion (Closed) > Biblical Criticism & History
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 03:12 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-30-2012, 04:36 AM   #181
Contributor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: nowhere
Posts: 15,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
I would have looked somewhere more trustworthy than where this came from. There are spelling mistakes; one source was repeated as two separate people (Dio Chrysostom, Dion Pruseus); the only famous Lysias lived centuries before; Appian, Arrian and Lucian were all writing over 100 years after the reputed date of Jesus' death, as is the case if the Ptolemy is Claudius; we only know about Justus because Josephus mentions him; we don't know which Petronius it is who wrote the Satyricon, so we don't know when he wrote and we only have his satyre which would need a reason to mention Jesus; if Apollonius is the one from Tyana we have no writings by him; there is no reason to consider that Quintilian, Seneca, Epictetus, Lucan should write about Jesus given their spheres of interest; Silius Italicus's only surviving work regards the 2nd Punic War; Quintus Curtius Rufus's only surviving work was on Alexander; Pomponius Mela wrote a geography book; scholars are not sure if Damis existed; Phlegon of Tralles was writing after 137CE; Columella wrote about agriculture; Theon of Smyrna wrote about mathematics; very few fragments of Favorinus survive so we can't say what he exactly wrote about; Florus wrote a history that stopped in 25BCE; Velleius Paterculus died in 31CE; Phaedrus left us a book of fables; Valerius Flaccus wrote an Argonautica; Pausanias wrote a description of Greece after 150CE; Aulus Gellius was born in 125CE; and I don't know who Hermogones might be.

The list is well, umm, underwhelming. Hopefully, it'll be put out to pasture now.
Gday all,

For those who haven't seen it, here is my breakdown of writers who woulda, coulda, shoulda mentioned Jesus :

WRITERS WHO SHOULD HAVE MENTIONED JESUS

PHILO

Philo Judaeus wrote very many books about Jewish religion and history, in the 30s and 40s, living in Alexandria, and visiting Jerusalem.

Philo was contemporary with Jesus and Paul,
Philo visited Jerusalem and had family there,
he developed the concept of the Logos and the holy spirit,
he was considered a Christian by some later Christians,
he wrote a great deal about related times and peoples and issues.

If Jesus had existed, Philo would almost certainly have written about him and his teachings.

Rating: SHOULD have mentioned Jesus or his teachings, but did not.
Weight: 5
If you want to believe this piece of numerical necromancy, that's your business. I didn't discount the possibility that Philo could have heard about Jesus if Jesus did exist.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
WRITERS WHO PROBABLY SHOULD HAVE MENTIONED JESUS

SENECA

Lucius Annaeus Seneca wrote many philosophic (Stoic) and satirical books and letters (and Tragedies) in Rome.

Seneca wrote a great deal on many subjects and mentioned many people. He was a Stoic, a school of thought considered sympathetic to Christian teachings.

In fact,
early Christians seemed to have expected him to discuss Christianity - they FORGED letters between him and Paul.

How else to explain these forgeries, except as Christian responses to a surprising VOID in Seneca's writings?

Rating: PROBABLY SHOULD have mentioned Jesus or his teachings, but did not.
Weight: 4
Seneca was intensely involved in the affairs of state and there is no reason to suspect that he would have had the opportunity to have heard anything from far off Judea.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
PLUTARCH

Plutarch of Chaeronea wrote many works on history and philosophy in Rome and Boetia in about 90-120 CE.

Plutarch wrote about influential Roman figures, including some contemporary to Jesus,
Plutarch wrote on Oracles (prophesies),
Plutarch wrote on moral issues,
Plutarch wrote on spiritual and religious issues.

If Plutarch knew of Jesus or the Gospel events, it is highly likely he would have mentioned them.

Rating: PROBABLY SHOULD have mentioned Jesus or his teachings, but did not.
Weight: 4
Another I didn't cross off the list.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
JUSTUS

Justus of Tiberias wrote a History of Jewish Kings in Galilee in late 1st century.

Photius read Justus in the 8th century and noted that he did not mention anything: "He (Justus of Tiberias) makes not one mention of Jesus, of what happened to him, or of the wonderful works that he did."

It is surprising that a contemporary writer from the very region of Jesus' alleged acts did not mention him.

Rating: PROBABLY SHOULD have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 3
And why should Justus have mentioned Jesus? We know of two works: a history of the war (and Jesus was not relevant to that) and a history of Judean/Judahite kings (and there is no reason to expect Jesus there either).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
WRITERS WHO COULD HAVE MENTIONED JESUS

DAMIS

Damis wrote most of what we know about Apollonius of Tyana. He was a philospher and mystic exactly contemporary with Jesus and who was rather similar to Jesus - enough for some authors to argue they were one and the same person.

If Damis/Apollonius had known of Jesus, he could have easily have been mentioned as a competitor. A story in which Apollonius bested Jesus in debate would not be un-expected.

Rating: COULD easily have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 2
As I mentioned, there is doubt as to the existence of Damis.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
PLINY THE ELDER

Gaius Plinius Secundus wrote a large Natural History in Rome c.80CE

Pliny wrote a great deal - his Natural History mentions HUNDREDS of people, major & minor - writers, leaders, poets, artists - often with as much reason as mentioning Jesus. (Of course like many other writers he talks about astronomy too, but never mentions the Star of Bethlehem or the darkness.)

It is not at all un-reasoble for this prolific writer to have mentioned Jesus or the Gospels events.

Rating: COULD easily have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 2
Another not scratched off.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
JUVENAL

Decimus Junius Juvenalis wrote sixteen satires in Rome in early 2nd century.

Lucian the Roman satirist DID ridicule Christians (as gullible, easily lead fools) in mid 2nd century. By the later time of Lucian, Christianity obviously was known to the wider Roman community. Whereas Juvenal wrote at a time when Christianity had only just started to rate a few tiny mentions (Pliny the Younger, Tacitus.)

Rating: COULD have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 2
I would have given more to Juvenal who was a racy recorder of what he heard in Rome, so if there was any weight to christians in Rome I would have thought Juvenal was a good hope to mention them. He liked to mock weirdnesses. A crucified savior would have been good fun.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
MARTIAL

Marcus Valerius Martialus wrote satires in Rome in late 1st century.

Martial wrote a large body of poems about all sorts of things. He mentions many people, places, stories and issues - major and minor, within and without Rome, such as :
Stoic suffering of discomfort and death,
virgin's blood,
Roman funerary practices,
the way accused men look in court,
Roman soldiers mocking their leaders,
anointing the body with oil,
Molorchus the good shepherd,
Tutilius a minor rhetorician, Nestor the wise,
the (ugly) Temple of Jupiter,

This shows Martial mentions or alludes to many and varied people and issues.

He could easily have mentioned Jesus (or the Gospel events).

Rating: COULD have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 2
Not scratched off.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
PETRONIUS

Petronius Arbiter wrote a large novel (a bawdy drama) the "Satyricon" c.60CE.

Petronius mentions all sorts of people and events in this large work, including :
a CRUCIFIXION !
a scene where guards are posted to stop a corpse being stolen,
a tomb scene of someone mistaking a person for a supernatural vision,
gods such as Bacchus and Ceres,
writers such as Sophocles and Euripides and Epicurus,
books such as the Iliad,
Romans such as Cato and Pompey,
people such as Hannibal, and the Governor of Ephesus,
female charioteers, slaves, merchants, Arabs, lawyers
baths, shipwrecks, meals...

This large work, cover MANY topics, including a CRUCIFIXION, and it was written just as Peter and Paul had come to Rome, allegedly. It could easily have mentioned Jesus.

Rating: COULD have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 2
There is no reason to think that the Satyricon was written by Petronius Arbiter. The manuscript tradition talks of a Titus Petronius, while Petronius Arbiter was Gaius Petronius.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
PAUSANIAS

Pausanias wrote the massive Guide to Greece in mid 2nd century.

Pausanias' work is vast and the index covers over 70 pages of small print, I estimate a couple of THOUSAND names are mentioned. He mentions a large number of minor figues from within and without Greece.

He even mentions a Jewish prophetess - a figure so minor she is essentially unknown: "Then later than Demo there was a prophetic woman reared among the Jews beyond Palestine; her name was Sabbe." Phokis, Book X, 12, [5]

Pausanias also mentions the Jewish rebellion under Hadrian.

Rating: COULD easily have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 2
Really, why should Pausanias, writing in the mid 2nd c. about Greece, have mentioned Jesus? I guess giving him a 2 indicates that it's not that he should have, but if he had heard and had the inclination he well, umm, just maybe, could have.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
EPICTETUS

Epictetus is known for several books of Stoic religious and philosophic discourses in the early 2nd century. One of his disciples was Arrian, and thanks to him much of Epictetus' works are extant.

Epictetus DID apparently mention "the Galileans", which could be a reference to :
the early Christians,
or
the revolt under Judas the Galilean in early 1st century.

Either way, this shows quite clearly that Epictetus could refer to a figure such as Jesus.

Rating: COULD easily have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 2
Is there anything in the context of Discourse 4.7 that would make you think that by "Galileans" he was dealing with christians? The Galileans were mentioned for a specific reason. You would be mindreading to conjure up an excuse for why Epictetus should mention Jesus.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
AELIUS ARISTIDES

Aelius Aristides the mid 2nd century Greek Orator spoke and wrote a History of Rome and other subjects - he seems to refer to the Christians as "impious men from Palestine" (Orations 46.2)

If he could mention people from Palestine, he could easily have mentioned Jesus.

Rating: COULD easily have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 2
He was born well into the 2nd c. This is clutching at straws.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
FRONTO

Marcus Cornelius Fronto of Rome wrote several letters in mid 2nd century.

According to Minucius Felix, he scandalised rites practiced by Roman Christians - so he could easily have mentioned Jesus.

Rating: COULD easily have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 2
A grammarian, please.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
PERSIUS

Aulus Persius Flaccus wrote six fairly long satires in Rome in the mid 1st century, of a rather philosophic nature.

The argument that no Roman satirist could be expected to mention Jesus, is proven wrong by the case of a Roman satirist who DID mention Jesus (but only as echoes of later Christian beliefs.)

Persius wrote a reasonably large body of work that mentions many people and issues.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 1
Well, Roman satyrists had fun with the oddities of Rome and if christians were there in any sizable entity.... I think 1 is miserly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
DIO CHRYSOSTOM

Dio Chrysostom (Cocceianus Dio) wrote many works and gave many speeches in various Roman and Greek centres in late 1st century, of which 80 survive e.g. the Euboicus.

Dio wrote a large number of works in the late 1st century - he certainly could have mentioned Jesus, if he knew of him.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 1
You should have read what I wrote. If you had you wouldn't have mentioned this guy twice, here vaguely possible and below as Dion Prusaeus, ruled out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
AULUS GELLIUS

Aulus Gellius wrote Attic Nights (Nights in Athens), a large compendium of many topics and which mentioned many people.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 1
The other leg plays Jingle Bells.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
LUCIUS APULEIUS

Lucius Apuleius wrote the Metamorphoses (the Golden Ass or Transformations of Lucius) and many other spiritual, historical, and philosophic works - several survive.

Rating: COULD have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 1
Another born well into the 2nd c., this one writing literary fiction. :huh:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
MARCUS AURELIUS

Marcus Aelius Aurelius Antoninus wrote the Stoic Meditations in mid 2nd century - he (apparently) refers once to the Christians in XI, 3.

Rating: COULD have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 1
You should cut your losses and settle for a mention of christians by someone as busy with affairs of state as to be continuously at war.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
MUSONIUS RUFUS

C. Musonius Rufus wrote on Stoic philosophy in Rome in mid 1st century.

Rating: COULD have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 1
Didn't write anything himself. His philosophical opinions were collected by a student. This is a 0.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
HIEROCLES

Hierocles of Alexandria wrote on Stoic philosophy in late 1st century.

Rating: COULD have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 1
By this stage the names that follow including this one seem to be just padding.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapyong View Post
MAXIMUS of TYRE

Cassius Maximus Tyrius, a Greek NeoPlatonic philosopher, wrote many works in mid 2nd century.

Rating: COULD have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 1


ARRIAN

Arrian wrote a History of Alexander c.120CE.

The subject is not related, but Arrian wrote a very large work which mentioned HUNDREDS of people, some not from Alexander's time.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


APPIAN

Appian wrote a large Roman History (from the Gracchi to Caesar) in mid 2nd century.

It's not particularly likely that this specific writer would mention Jesus.
But,
he wrote a LARGE work which mentions HUNDREDS of people.
Appian does mention some issues of HIS day (mid 2nd century), e.g. a decision by Hadrian.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


THEON of SMYRNA

Theon of Smyrna wrote on astronomy/philosophy in early 2nd century.

Theon wrote about philosophy. If Jesus and his teachings were known, it is entirely plausible for to mention them.

Theon also wrote about astronomy.
If he had heard about the Star of Bethlehem or the Darkness (as an event, or from the Gospels) he could easily have mentioned it.

Apologists frequently cite Phlegon and Thallus, astronomers who mentioned eclipses (but NOT Jesus or the Gospel events, that is merely later Christian wishful thinking) as evidence for Jesus.

An astronomer could easily be expected to mention those incidents, especially when apologists claim other astronomers of the period did exactly that.

The silence of early astronomers about the Star of Bethlehem or the crucifixion darkness argues these "events" were unknown until later.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


QUINTILIAN

Marcus Fabius Quintilianus, wrote the "Education of an Orator" in Rome in late 1st century.

One of the things Jesus was allegedly noted for was his PUBLIC SPEECHES - e.g. the Sermon on the Mount, which supposedly drew and influenced large crowds.

If Quintilian had heard of Jesus or the Gospels events, he could have mentioned the allegedly famous speeches of Jesus.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


LUCIUS ANNAEUS FLORUS

Lucius Annaeus Florus wrote an Epitome of Roman History.

Although not directly on subject, Florus wrote a large work which mentions many names. He could have mentioned Jesus if he had known of him.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


LUCAN

Marcus Annaeus Lucanus wrote the Pharsalia (Civil War) in Rome in mid 1st century.

In his large poem, the Pharsalia, he mentions some events from later times, and he covers many different issues and people in passing.
He:
mentions an event from 56CE,
refers to places as far afield as Sicily and Kent,
refered to Stoic religious beliefs about the end of the world,
refers to many books and myths and persons and events not part of the main story.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


STATIUS

Publius Papinius Statius wrote numerous minor and epic poems (e.g. Ode to Sleep and the Thebaid) in Rome in late 1st century.

Statius wrote many works on several subjects, he could have mentioned Jesus.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


HERO of ALEXANDRIA

Hero(n) of Alexandria wrote many technical works, including astronomy.

If he had known of the Gospel stories about Jesus, he could have mentioned them.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


GEMINUS

Geminus wrote on mathematics astronomy in Greece.

If he had known of the Gospel stories about Jesus, he could have mentioned them.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


ALBINUS

Albinus taught on (neo-)Platonism in early 2nd century, a little survives.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


ARISTOCLES

Aristocles of Messene wrote On Philosophy, early 2nd century.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


APOLLODORUS

Apollodorus compiled a large Mythology in mid 2nd century.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


HEPHAESTION

Hephaestion of Alexandria wrote many works in mid 2nd century.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


SEXTUS EMPIRICUS

Sextus Empiricus wrote Outlines of Scepticism in mid 2nd century.

Rating: COULD possibly have mentioned Jesus, but did not.
Weight: 0.5


WRITERS WHO COULD NOT BE EXPECTED TO HAVE MENTIONED JESUS

Dion Prusaeus
Paterculus
Ptolemy
Valerius Maximus
Pomponius Mela
Quintus Curtus Rufus
Lucius Junius Moderatus Columella
Favorinus
Phaedrus
Babrius
Silius Italicus
Marcus Manilius
Cleomedes
Dioscorides
Sextus Julius Frontinus
Nicomachus of Gerasa
Menelaus of Alexandria
Menodotus of Nicomedia
Tiberius Claudius Herodes Atticus
Valerius Flaccus


Kapyong
spin is offline  
Old 05-30-2012, 05:08 AM   #182
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 4,095
Default

I am having trouble identifying non-Christian Roman or other historians in the 4th and 5th centuries. Did the pagan literati totally disappear by then?
Duvduv is offline  
Old 05-30-2012, 05:55 AM   #183
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 144
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mandelbrot View Post
Considering Judges 13:5-7 is specifically about Samson you have shown no convincing reason that Matthew 2:23 is referring to anything other than a misreading of Isaiah 11:1.
Beyond the claim, you've shown no connection between Mt 2:23 with Isa 11:1. The only similarity in Isa 11:1 is one word that is radically spelt differently.

[T2]LXX (A) Jdg 13:5
οτι ναζιραιον θεου εσται
Mt 2:23
οτι ναζωραιον κληθησεται[/T2]
(The major difference here is "be" v. "be called", which in itself is a difference seen in the LXX coming from Hebrew--see, eg, Hos 1:10.)
I did write Hebrew didn't I? You do know the difference between Hebrew and Greek don't you? If you do, did you post the Greek for any particular reason?
Mandelbrot is offline  
Old 05-30-2012, 05:58 AM   #184
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 144
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by outhouse View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by spin View Post
Unlike you, to talk about things I know something about.


You've shown no ability to state views of any substance. You won't provide evidence. You hollowly negate others' views. And can only respond to opposing views by appealing to authority.


Happily enough people here are aware that you don't know what you are talking about. You are unable to comprehend anything about my education and knowledge.


i wont provide evidence LOL


Paul, Gmark, Gluke, Gmatthew are plenty





and I understand I am a thorn in the side of mythers wanting to have a website to promote their fringe position, but that has nothing to do with biblical criticism.

speak for yourself when it comes to biblical knowlede, I have a better grasp on reality then most. Its not hillarious to watch uneducated people bag on scholars from a stance of ignorance.



you want to impress people, quit attacking the messenger and attack the message, if you can
Chill out, you are letting everybody see how arrogant you are and considering the spelling errors I frequently see in your posts you really have nothing to brag about.
Mandelbrot is offline  
Old 05-30-2012, 07:24 AM   #185
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

I see no reason any of those writers would have mentioned Jesus, or even heard of him. He would have been a nobody in his time, the crucifixion a non-event, the cult in his name one more obscure Jewish sect among many. HJ did not become historically significant until Constantine.
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 05-30-2012, 11:41 AM   #186
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the fringe of the caribbean
Posts: 18,988
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes the Cynic View Post
I see no reason any of those writers would have mentioned Jesus, or even heard of him. He would have been a nobody in his time, the crucifixion a non-event, the cult in his name one more obscure Jewish sect among many. HJ did not become historically significant until Constantine.
Again, you are UTTERLY wrong. You seem to have forgotten that the supposed Apostles, disciples and Paul should have been PREACHING about the Jesus story since the time of Aretas throughout the Roman Empire.

And, not only should they have PREACHED the Jesus story, they should have DOCUMENTED stories about Jesus in letters and books for DECADES immediately AFTER Jesus was crucified.

The Jesus story should have been PREACHED within 50 days of the Passover and should have started on the DAY of Pentecost.

If Christus in Annals is NOT a forgery, then Christus should have been WELL KNOWN in Judea so much so that PILATE had him PAY the ULTIMATE Penalty for starting a new Mischevious religion.

If Jesus CALLED Christ in Antiquities 20.9.1 is NOT a forgery then Jesus called Christ and his Brother were WELL KNOWN in Judea and the Roman Empire.

Again, you promote Bait and Switch.

How in the world can you claim Jesus was a Nobody and still claim Annals with Christus is NOT a forgery??

How in the world can you claim Jesus was a Nobody and still claim Antiquities of the Jews 20.9.1 with Jesus CALLED Christ is NOT a fogery???

If YOUR Jesus was a nobody then Tacitus Annals with Christus and Antiquities with Jesus called Christ are Forgeries or NOT about YOUR Jesus and Paul, the Apostles and disciples did NOT preach about Jesus Christ since 37 CE.

A Jewish Messiah is the Most significant and most Expected Jewish ruler and in GALATIANS the writer claimed Jesus the Christ and Son of God.

Your claim is UTTERLY erroneous. YOUR Jesus could NOT have been a Nobody unless you employ Bait and Switch.

The HJ argument is a massive Bait and Switch argument. They offer a Nobody but sell us a Jewish Messiah, the King of the Jews.
aa5874 is offline  
Old 05-30-2012, 12:44 PM   #187
Moderator -
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
Posts: 4,639
Default

"Son of God" doesn't mean anything special, and Jewish Messiahs were a dime a dozen. Jesus himself wasn't special, his contemporary importance popularity were retrojections onto a person who was utterly obscure in his own time and place.

The difference between HJ and Bible Jesus is like the difference between the real Chuck Norris and the Chuck Norris internet character.
Diogenes the Cynic is offline  
Old 05-30-2012, 02:42 PM   #188
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Quote:
Philo Judaeus wrote very many books about Jewish religion and history, in the 30s and 40s, living in Alexandria, and visiting Jerusalem.

Philo was contemporary with Jesus and Paul,
Philo visited Jerusalem and had family there,
he developed the concept of the Logos and the holy spirit,
he was considered a Christian by some later Christians,
he wrote a great deal about related times and peoples and issues.

If Jesus had existed, Philo would almost certainly have written about him and his teachings.
Anastasius of Sinai had a summary of a work written by Philo against Christianity. I have argued that the work resembles Celsus's 'anti-Christian treatise' written by a Jew at the beginning of the True Word. This may explain why Origen never tells us the name of the Jew. Origen's arguments about this text are strange, claiming that Celsus 'forged' the treatise but even forgeries are almost inevitably written in the name of someone (usually famous).
stephan huller is offline  
Old 05-30-2012, 02:43 PM   #189
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,779
Default

Gday,

Quote:
Originally Posted by Logical View Post
Kapyong,
Thanks for the list. Why doesn't it include dates of birth and death?
Not a bad idea, I'll update my list with that when I get time.


K.
Kapyong is offline  
Old 05-30-2012, 02:43 PM   #190
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: seattle, wa
Posts: 9,337
Default

Quote:
"Son of God" doesn't mean anything special
Yeah like 'fucking idiot' especially when you're the idiot.
stephan huller is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:10 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.